Reaching Atlantica Conference Promotes Political Integration With The US

Posted on Friday, June 02 at 13:13 by sthompson
1. "Reaching Atlantica" is not an inclusive conference. As noted on the "Reaching Atlantica" website, the conference is open to "small business owners, CEO's, managers and executives, as well as Government representatives from the four Atlantic Provinces and the US Northeast." The registration fee for a non-member of the Chamber of Commerce or Board of Trade is $595. plus HST. Given that cross-border relations greatly affect all people, this conference does not include adequate representation from all sectors of civil society. 2. "Reaching Atlantica" is driven by corporate interests. The conference sponsors include corporate-giants BMO Financial Group, Mosaik Mastercard, Irving oil, Deloitte, and Aliant telecommunications, as well as Peter MacKay's Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency. Featured speakers at the event include Richard Egleton, Senior Vice-President & Chief Economist of BMO Financial Group and Kenneth Irving, President and CEO of Irving Oil. Any reassessment of cross-border relations should involve government, labour, environmental, cultural and social groups, as well as business. 3. "Reaching Atlantica" threatens the ability of governments to effectively represent their citizens. Just as corporate executives are now formally part of the negotiations on the so-called North American Security and Prosperity Partnership, the supporters of "Reaching Atlantica" identify as a goal, "attending the yearly New England Governors and Eastern Canadian Premiers Conference." The interests of the citizens of Atlantic Canada and the north-eastern United States must take precedence over the interest of an economic elite. 4. "Reaching Atlantica" promotes economic integration into the United States. A key goal of the conference is to look at "encouraging inter-provincial and international trade through the removal of barriers and harmonization of regulations." One of the workshops titled, "Impediments of the Region" will look at "a number of impediments" to being an "international trade corridor" such as "the impacts of federal and regional legislation." The Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, a key participant in the conference, has stated, "If the border cannot be made to disappear, its impact must at least be blurred." 5. "Reaching Atlantica" promotes political integration into the United States. Brian Lee Crowley, President of the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies (AIMS), is a keynote speaker at the "Reaching Atlantica" conference. A January 2006 AIMS Commentary document recommends: "Ottawa should build on its Smart Commerce initiative with the United States to accelerate and simplify even further border-crossing policies, while also working with our American partners on integrated perimeter security, the harmonization of external tariffs, and mutually agreeable standards for entry of persons from third countries." 6. "Reaching Atlantica" threatens the rights of workers. The AIMS website lists minimum wage laws and union density not as signs of a healthy society but as "public policy distress factors." Reducing both would increase what Atlantica proponents call "labour market flexibility," which often just means more work for less money and less rights. Speaking with CTV last year, Brian Lee Crowley called public sector labour unions "destructive," and in a Globe and Mail column from 2000 on the evils of equalization, he said what Atlantic Canada needs more than anything are "significant tax cuts, labour flexibility, social welfare and [EI] reform and improved profitability for business." For more information about the Resisting Atlantica meeting on June 8, please download the poster from our website. -- The Council of Canadians 700-170 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5. Tel: (613) 233-2773; Toll-free: 1-800-387-7177 Fax: (613) 233-6776 inquiries@canadians.org www.canadians.org

Note: www.canadians.org

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:29 pm
    Nice to see that this is getting some airplay. However, you should have mentioned the "<a href="http://www.stopatlantica.com"">www.stopatlantica.com"</a>; website. There are far more grassroots groups pushing this than Maude. <br />
    <br />
    Some of their policies have been modified since 2000, for example, they no longer think that just tax breaks or 'labour mobility' is what the maritimes need. Now they also want massive federal dollars to build up the port of Halifax and a rail line through 'atlantica'. <br />
    <br />
    Still no word yet on how exactly this is supposed to help people. EI has been slashed, the minimum wage is lowest in the country, contrary to what is said by lefties, New Brunswick is ALREADY a 'corporate run society', it's not 'in danger of becoming one'. <br />
    <br />
    You also missed the privatization of power and utilities, and the 'jettisoning' of Labrador from Newfoundland. <br />
    <br />
    Also, keep in mind this is a complete joke in the states. There is no way in hell places like Maine, NH or Vermont or New York state are going to get rid of minimum wage laws. The only real city involved is Buffalo, and only because it is suffering so badly that it will talk to anybody who will talk to them. <br />
    <br />
    However, as said, check out "<a href="http://www.stopatlantica.com"">www.stopatlantica.com"</a>; for updates.

  2. by Deacon
    Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:31 pm
    Are these people for real?

    "The AIMS website lists minimum wage laws and union density not as signs of a healthy society but as "public policy distress factors." Reducing both would increase what Atlantica proponents call "labour market flexibility," which often just means more work for less money and less rights."

    Minimum wages laws are the only thing that makes it possible for some people to make ends meet.

    I am aware of more than a few business owners who would love to pay their employees 4 and 5 an hour, or less.

    It's worth noting that the proponents of this are nowhere near lacking the essentials of life.

    Their concept of "labour market flexibility", if implimented will no doubt usher in a return to the good old days of the Winnipeg General Strike.

    It seems for all their high priced education, the upper classes are still dumber than a bag of rocks.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  3. Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:54 pm
    We become angry that our west coast lumber conglomerates, today's version of the old time robber barons feel cheated by the US. We also become angry when the east coast lumber barons favor the same deal. We must really love to pay fat subsidies to the rich. Maude doesn't mention that inexcapable part of her plan, does she?
    Finally, why does the Council of Canadains and even organized labour and group upon group of tax exempt clergymen and women support the wage depressing introduction of millions of illegal aliens into NA and Europe. It's ironic how we want the boarders of our country and the locks on our doors fulfill some stupid political gesture.
    George Bush speaks for many who says they are going to come by the millions unless you promise them something really good when they get here. Then I guess they won't come except - damned George, they would be already here before we figured out what you meant. Sounds like the East vs West fracas and the tax exempt crowd as usual are volunteering everyone else to pay the freight. My, for that we need a really grand promise.

  4. Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:31 pm
    I have no idea what the above means. It's actually AIMS who want 'labour mobility', meaning when they have some work available there'll be jobs, when there isn't, get the hell out. It's AIMS and their sponsors, McCain and Irving (Cavendish) who like the almost free labour shipped in. That's old news from way back, Canada has always had a policy of shipping in 'agricultural workers' and 'domestic servants', without, of course, granting them any rights at all. They actually want to stretch that to oil workers, but the thinking seems to be that if maritimers, and prairiemen don't have a place to go, they'll stay home and cause problems.

  5. Sat Jun 03, 2006 4:10 am
    Canada is facing a very serious time and sooner or later the people are going to have to make a decision. To date we know that the political process has been high-jacked but what I call the Canadian Oligarchs and they have managed to use the party system to conquer us. <br />
    <br />
    I have watched the party system fall victim to those people who we let steal it away from the grass roots citizens, the working class and we may very well have lost the battle and our country to them. <br />
    <br />
    I see no other way to rid this country of these oligarchs, unless we stop supporting the very system that provided them with the ability to control what we are led to believe is a democratic process, unless we stop voting. <br />
    <br />
    Here in Nova Scotia a small group of citizens are doing every thing they can to expose the corrupt political system Nova Scotian's have been high -jacked by. This group of citizens have refused to vote in this and any other election until changes are made, to the electoral process that represents a new and reformed system that better serves all Novas Scotian's. <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://hawkeyenews.blogspot.com/">http://hawkeyenews.blogspot.com/</a> <br />
    <p>---<br>Good government is not a party government

  6. by RPW
    Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:25 pm
    <blockquote>Canada is facing a very serious time and sooner or later the people are going to have to make a decision.</blockquote>This is hitting the proverbial nail on the head! Canadians are afraid to make a decision!<p>---<br>RickW

  7. Sat Jun 03, 2006 4:21 pm
    What exactly is the decision? To write posts at websites or blogs?

  8. Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:05 am
    Just touching base on this important issue. I have written <a href="http://thecylinder.wordpress.com/2006/06/04/under-the-radar-atlantica-rising/">a post</a> on it, with links to this article here at <i>Vive</i>. From what I can see, it is getting some readership and that can only be good for the cause. <p> As well, I thought some <i>Vive</i> readers might want to sink their teeth into these two records of meetings on the Atlantica project, one <a href="http://www.gov.ns.ca/legislature/hansard/comm/ed/ed_2002oct29.htm">from the Government of Nova Scotia</a>, the other <a href="http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?SourceId=5940">from the Federal Government</a>. I've read parts of them. It seems there are a lot of questions that remain unanswered, one of them regarding the Kyoto Protocol! <p> Finally, I have adjusted the link provided above by <b>Marcarc</b> that contained a small glitch. Here is the corrected link (I hope): <a href="http://www.stopatlantica.com/">Stop Atlantica</a>!

  9. Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:53 pm
    Beautiful stuff furgaia, I don't even want to know how much time you spent to come up with that!



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news