For the ten of millions in the Live 8 audience who signed the pledges and who will be watching the Gleneagles summit for results, it is important to talk about the next steps. What more can be done to Make Poverty History? How can we move on to the ideas for a better world that inspired the Live 8 musicians to perform, and the audience to tune in, and sign on?
Much of what we do in the West needs to be rethought. Here are some proposals, worked out after meeting Southern Hemisphere economists in Havana: ten ways to move ahead, having as an objective to globalize solidarity — the spirit on display at Live 8 across the world.
* The real economy operates because people work together to meet each other's needs, not because of accumulation by the few, for themselves. Organizing economic life to meet basic needs across our one world recognizes this principle of solidarity.
* Work belongs to those who produce, who create, and who serve others. Human dignity requires no less. Exchange of products is first about the sharing of work, about human relations, not about price flexibility.
* Prices for primary and manufactured products require long term contracts, and should not be set by short term auctions which pit large corporations against small producers.
* Reversing the unjust distribution of power and resources requires international cooperation in service of national development, and vibrant local economies, not subordination to American hegemony.
* Environmental and social costs affect all and cannot be treated as external to price formation. Natural justice requires green taxes and regulations. Prosecution of pollution violations is in the common interest. Green plans are essential for human development.
* Working for human development means defeating illiteracy, disease, and hunger. Citizens' rights to health care, education, and the provision of basic public services, including income support for those in need, are universal and irrevocable.
* Redistribution of wealth and income is an important economic objective. It needs to be supported through fair, transparent taxation. Public expenditure budgets represent a common fund for the common good.
* Speculation, and manipulation of paper assets, are not authentic sources of wealth. Finance must be locally controlled, and regulated by national sovereignty.
* The perverse flow of international capital from poor countries to rich reflects unequal power relations, not sound economic principles. The current account deficit of the United States is unsustainable, not the deficits of the poor countries of the world. Rich countries should adjust their policies to meet the needs of the poor and not, as prevails today, the reverse.
* Because we trade only with ourselves, the world cannot have a balance of trade surplus or deficit. It is unreasonable to expect all countries to show balance of trade surpluses at the same time. Rather than asking indebted countries to export themselves out of debt, it is preferable to expect substantial debt relief, and the extension of low cost credit for international trade, investment and development.
Make Poverty History organizers reminded us that 1,200,000,000 people live in extreme poverty today, 800,000,000 people will go to bed hungry tonight, and that 50,000 people will die from poverty-related causes tomorrow.
Makepovertyhistory.ca says: “It doesn't have to be this way.” When enough people agree, political leaders will do what they do best. Follow.
Duncan Cameron is associate publisher of rabble.ca. He writes from Vancouver. His column appears each Wednesday.
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 7, 2005]
Note: http://www.rabble.ca/co...
---
Dave Ruston
As for starving Africans - they make great props for concerts, ripe for exploitation by self-promoting rock stars. This concert was as useful as the last.
You can however read and cmprehend can you not?<br />
<br />
Cameroon became entrapped when it sank deeper in debt as the price of its oil exports dropped sharply after 1982. It turned for help in 1988 to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which loaned money but demanded policies that led to currency devaluation, budget cuts, privatization of public services and widespread hardship. Under the IMF regime, meager education spending stagnated, incomes declined and the debt burden more than doubled. Cameroon was classified as a Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC).<br />
In 1994 the IMF pushed Cameroon to rapidly accelerate its timber exports. The number of logging enterprises nearly doubled within a year, and lumber exports grew by 50 percent in the following year. The forests were devastated, but the policies didn't help relieve debt: World lumber prices were dropping, partly because other countries were boosting their logging exports, often under IMF pressure.<br />
<a href="http://thezambian.com/Reports/aid.aspx">http://thezambian.com/Reports/aid.aspx</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
With international ‘aid’ to soon reach $100 billion a year (from $60 billion), it will be the final kick in the teeth of the poor, crippling further their Third World economies. Indeed, (as I have found out after researching through reports and what-not), it’s often profoundly dangerous to the poor and inimical to their interests to have ‘aid’ imposed upon them: It has financed the creation of monstrous projects that, at vast expense, have devastated the environment and ruined lives; it has facilitated the emergence of fantastical and devious bureaucracies staffed by legions of self-serving hypocrites; it has sapped the initiative, and creativity and enterprise of ordinary people and substituted the superficial and irrelevant showiness of imported advice; it has sucked potential entrepreneurs and intellectuals in the developin! g countries everywhere into non-productive administrative activities; it has created a ‘moral tone’ in international affairs that denies the hard task of wealth creation and that substitutes easy handouts for the rigors of self-help; in addition, throughout the Third World, it has allowed the dead grip of imposed officialdom to suppress popular choice and individual freedom. Call it what you will---but I will call it for what it is: Noble Colonialism! Ain’t that a ‘female dog’? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/ws/2000/imf60.html">http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/ws/2000/imf60.html</a> <br />
If you've ever owed money to a bank, you'll know it's not a pleasant experience. Depending on whether they think you're good for the money, the bank will either screw you in the short term or milk you dry over the longer haul. Banks are in the business of making money and generally they'll stop at nothing to get their way. <br />
Right now across the world, the lives of millions of people are in the hands of two of the most powerful financial institutions ever created - the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB). These banks hold the lion's share of the debt currently owed by the 'Third World'. This debt first accumulated in the '70s when poorer countries borrowed in order to develop their economies. But when the world recession hit in the '80s huge numbers of countries found they couldn't repay their loans &endash; this was when the IMF and WB first <br />
<p>---<br>Always be tolerant with those who disagree with you. After all, they have a perfect right to their ridiculous opinions-<br />
unknown<br />
The more laws that are written
---
Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major...leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf
Thanks.
When it comes to governance, ALL governance these days, I have developed an extremely cynical view.
How amazingly convenient the are these new “terrorist attacks”
The G8 in full swing, reports of Downing Street document leaks, support for the illegal invasion of Iraq waning and what better time to create world wide panic
I have maintained for some time now both here and other forums that as so called free men and women we don’t start to pay attention to the goings on of Big Gov we will have Bigger Bro.
---
Always be tolerant with those who disagree with you. After all, they have a perfect right to their ridiculous opinions-
unknown
The more laws that are written
---
Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major...leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf