Security Programs Strain Relationship Between US Government, Muslims

Posted on Saturday, February 25 at 16:15 by jensonj
Yet recent disclosures of Bush administration domestic surveillance programs have put new strains on those communities' ties with the federal government. "There are several incidents and policies that are unfairly targeting Muslims because of who they are - not because of what they did," said Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American Islamic Relations in Washington. Awad said the rapport built up with the government since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, "is at its lowest point because of these programs." Federal authorities say their tactics are vital to preventing further attacks. "All investigations conducted by the FBI are based either in intelligence or criminal information," FBI spokesman Rich Kolko said. "We do this in our efforts to prevent or detect an act of terrorism on the country, which is the FBI's No. 1 priority." Security experts say the government has to walk a fine line between protecting against terrorism and respecting people's rights. Community leaders estimate that up to eight million Muslims live in the United States, two-thirds of whom are U.S. citizens. "The 9/11 hijackers were from the Middle East, they were Muslim, they were between 20 and 40 years old," said David Heyman, homeland security director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "Law enforcement can't ignore this - they've got an obligation to protect the public. But they must do so with care." http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=43cbe31b-5737-4e76-8daf-1b33476de825&k=27172 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 26, 2006]

Note: http://www.canada.com/t...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:12 am
    Real freedom is under attack! Surely, the US government must know who is a threat and who isn`t. I really hate hearing about stuff like this. Most people just want to live a normal life.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:48 am
    If we GTFO ouT Afganistan, like we should....then maybe we will be on the right track. We should spend our Money on free hospitals and education, if anything. Not Pipleine Security, and killing the "taliban" and "Al queda"

    We are not supporting freedom, we are enforcing for the Banksters, and their UN Global Government. We have no right or reason to be there, as Canadians, in terms of fighting "insurgents".

    I say that I'm a nationalistic Patriot type.

    We must see through the bullcrap.

    Say no to Enforcing for the UN and CIA.
    Just look at what happend to Opium production in Afganistan, since the Invasion.
    Look at the History of Afganistan.
    Do you REALLY think we can help change that country?
    We cant even get our own shit in order....

  3. Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:33 am
    I was hoping Canadians would have seen those poor Afghani women (yes they were teachers of girls which was considered an awful sin) get their brains blown out by the Taliban in public execution in the middle of a crowded sports arena, in front of a wildly enthusiastic crowd of spectators. I thought that might have shocked decent people into action. I took it to be a no-brainer. But some people claim the Taliban, a throwback to the religious zealots of the 7th century, was pretty good against opium production. I guess there's just no convincing those people.

  4. Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:42 am
    If the CIA had not sponsored them to begin with, I might have a different view. These things go back much further than the last 20 years my friend.

    Truth is, a people has to fight for their own freedom.

  5. Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:44 am
    I know this may astound you, but we really should not and cannot police the world.

    I know, it sounds crazy, with all the Pro-UN propaganda out there...but sadly its true.
    Get used to it.

  6. Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:12 am
    Hi AB If I may

    I see so many divisions in our lives that "we" aren't "we"
    Governments are not "we"
    the various parties are not "we"
    Canadians are not "we" Hell! most marriages are not "we"
    The CIA sure the hell ain'r we" Religions ain't "we"

    My smart-assed friends upon hearung "we" retort with,
    "we"?
    "What "we" ???
    "You got a rat in your pocket??"
    Try and understand my position here please.

    "we" ar fragmented!
    "Us" against the "not us"
    Sorry for the rant
    Dio





    ---
    People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
    Alexei Sayle

  7. Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:10 pm
    Who sponsered who? Ahmad Shah Massoud was military commander of the Northern Allience who were in a bitter war with the Taliban. His successor is President of Afghanistan today. Who sponsered who? Jimmy Carter, the peace prize winner, sent money and arms to the Mujahadin (under Ahmad Shah Massoud), a coalition fighting the Soviets who had invaded Afghanistan to prop up their little puppets. Ronald Reagan did too. The mujahadin split into factions after the collapse of the Soviets but THERE WAS NO TALIBAN UNTIL 1994 for christsake. Who sponsered who? I guess some people still won't support what is right and decent even if it means they simply won't be overly critical of those who do try and help. If that is the case they should say as much.

  8. by avatar Milton
    Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:21 pm
    Try looking at what is going on instead of reading from a script John Tiller. Ask who benefits from actions that are taken. Don't throw logical fallicies into discussions.

    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)

  9. Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:46 pm
    I agree Milton
    AND it is a very difficult challenge to those who have largeinvestments in what is in their reality


    ---
    People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
    Alexei Sayle

  10. Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:45 pm
    The Taliban came in from Pakistan, from the Whabbi schools there, which were set up and funded by the CIA. They did not just fund one resisance leader, they funded or provided arms for pretty much all of them. The Taliban's educational books, were printed in the USA by a CIA front company. Osama Bin Laden was a CIA agent, and that is why he had ties to the Taliban at all. George Bush Sr, and Rumsfled and Cheney were ALL in Regan's adminstration, overseeing all of it. Bush was the real power behind the throne, just as Cheny is now with Jr.

    This is not rocket science.
    Also the current Presidnet of Afganistan, is not the direct successor to a mujahadeen leader. He is a UNOCAL executive, not a freedom fighter.
    Your not getting your news from CanWest Global are you?

    They lie, they lie right to your face...

  11. Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:52 pm
    Yes, yes. I "we" I mean Canadians collectively, which sort of includes the government but not really. :p
    I don't think the government should be putting the people who are supposed to defend us, into harms way unescassarily. The entire reason for the war was a fraud to begin with.
    Our Nation is not the World Police. Bedsides that there are worse countries.(like North Korea) We are still giving "Aid" money to China. Do they really need "Aid"?
    My point is its a joke. You can justify it any way you want, but in reality its impossible to expect we can enact social change on a group of people half way accross the world, by force of arms.

    end rant/
    :p



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news