We are asking for real investigation journalism once again. Support for CBC by the people has declined, not because we don’t value CBC, but because CBC has stopped respecting our right to informed choices. When CBC Broadcast Medicare, Schmedicare, and did not Broadcast the Life of Tommy Douglas, what message were they sending? As noted below, what form of propaganda has taken over our airwaves?
“The attack on Douglas is ironic because just before this program was broadcast, the CBC postponed for two months a mini-series on Douglas's life set to air a week before the federal election.
The combination of the two decisions provoked a storm of protest. Complainants had a right to be annoyed. The video was financed largely by Canadian taxpayers through the Canadian Television Fund ($135,000), Knowledge Network (unknown amount), and the Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit and Film Incentive BC (substantial federal and provincial tax credits). The people who want and benefit from Medicare unwittingly financed this attack on it.
Eva Czigler, acting head of CBC network programming, wrote a boiler-plate response to the complaints. The Douglas program was pushed back until March because of the "appearance of partisanship" if it was aired during the election campaign, she wrote. Fair enough. The Douglas program, Czigler explained, emphasized Tommy Douglas's "profound commitment to socialism" and would surely be lambasted by the right.
But Medicare, Schmedicare, a film advocating a full-blown, two-tier system of health care, which is promoted by only one party, Stephen Harper's Conservatives -- even though they are pretending to support Medicare during this election -- must be non-partisan.”
(Quote from: The bias, the blank spots and the damage.
By Donald Gutstein
Published: January 6, 2006 TheTyee.ca)
Canadian Action Party declares, “Tommy Douglas was an advocate of using the Bank of Canada properly to support the social programs Canadians want. The ideals this great man espoused are a reflection of Canadian values, as indicated by the overwhelming support of him as the ‘Greatest Canadian’. The CBC has either been incompetent, unfair, or they have become the incredibly biased spokesperson for the corporate powers behind our government.”
-30-
Contact: Leader, Constance (Connie) Fogal
Telephone (604) 872 2128 home; Fax: (604) 872 1504
E-mail: conniefogal@telus.net
Head Office #385- 916 West Broadway, Vancouver B.C. V5Z1K7
Tel: (604) 708-3372;Fax: (604) 872 1504; e- mail: info@canadianactionparty.ca
www.canadianactionparty.ca
Catherine Whelan Costen, Canadian Action Party President & Communications Director
cathpublish@wildroseinternet.ca Ph: 403-660-0449
*authorized by Registered Agent of Canadian Action Party
link to article on vive
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060106103236305
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 9, 2006]
Note: www.canadianactionparty.ca
http://www.vivelecanada...

In other words, they are good little canadians, just doing what they're told.
What makes you think your statement of CAP's demands to alter the approved state propoganda will cause anyting to change?
I guess that goes to show that CAP is just another social-democrat party, albeit one that places it emphasis on different things than the NDP does (at least in its post-Waffle incarnation).
Why not? They could run all the biased half-baked programming they want and no one could tell them different.
---
Dave Ruston
As for why call on the employees...because they are asking for support, they are asking for politicians to talk about CBC, they asked for support during the lockout...they are also saying that no politicians are listening which is untrue...CAP has been listening...CBC employees do have the ability to speak out...I know they can't change it from within, but they can declare the ties that bind them to the public...that would be a start...
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
Clearly you're *not* interested in debate. You seem to believe that the Canada Health Act was writted on stone tablets.
Public single-payer insurance? Absolutely! State-owned providers of health-care services? Sure, but not exclusively. The private sector can play a useful role as well.
Two different issues, each a debate onto itself. I get very annoyed with this knee-jerk "private bad" attitude that Medicare absolutists take, and the *deliberate* blurring of the *separate* issues of insurance and service provision.
Not everyone who delivers health care services has to be a unionized government employee.
I am not willing to continue to support this public broadcaster, when they are not willing to support the public who funds them.
It is time they pulled their head out of the Liberal Parties ass. I want equal time for all who run in this election and that the bottom line.
---
Good government is not a party government
---
Dave Ruston
Thanks to a private *INSURANCE* system, yes. Still blurring the lines, I see.
"Tommy Douglas` system worked, and when it spread across Canada, it was the envy of the world-"
No, it wasn't. Other countries had socialized medicine too, and some even came up with private-public mixes which work *better* than the Canadian system.
"Private companies won`t stop to worry about how the average joe or the poor can afford health care."
And politicans and government bureaucrats don't worry about the waiting lists, as long as they keep their jobs and can afford to go down to the States to get the treatments *they* need.
Medicare is a program that somehow became a religion. That's why a nation shouldn't tie its identity to a set of social programs. It shuts down debate on how to make these systems more efficient and effective.
Sacred cows make the best hamburger.
---
Dave Ruston
There is a difference between big government and good government. Government is best when it helps citizens attain self-sufficiency. The (admittedly unattainable) goal of government should be to render itself obsolete, or at least to approach obsolescence. Creating and perpetuating a culture of dependency in order to feed a narcissistic desire on the part of politicians, bureaucrats and elites for control over us has been the downfall of our society.
They've convinced us we need to keep the training wheels on. That's because they're afraid of our knowing how to ride unassisted.