CAP Calls For CBC Employees To Take Back OUR Airwaves!

Posted on Saturday, January 07 at 13:15 by whelan costen
We are asking for real investigation journalism once again. Support for CBC by the people has declined, not because we don’t value CBC, but because CBC has stopped respecting our right to informed choices. When CBC Broadcast Medicare, Schmedicare, and did not Broadcast the Life of Tommy Douglas, what message were they sending? As noted below, what form of propaganda has taken over our airwaves? “The attack on Douglas is ironic because just before this program was broadcast, the CBC postponed for two months a mini-series on Douglas's life set to air a week before the federal election. The combination of the two decisions provoked a storm of protest. Complainants had a right to be annoyed. The video was financed largely by Canadian taxpayers through the Canadian Television Fund ($135,000), Knowledge Network (unknown amount), and the Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit and Film Incentive BC (substantial federal and provincial tax credits). The people who want and benefit from Medicare unwittingly financed this attack on it. Eva Czigler, acting head of CBC network programming, wrote a boiler-plate response to the complaints. The Douglas program was pushed back until March because of the "appearance of partisanship" if it was aired during the election campaign, she wrote. Fair enough. The Douglas program, Czigler explained, emphasized Tommy Douglas's "profound commitment to socialism" and would surely be lambasted by the right. But Medicare, Schmedicare, a film advocating a full-blown, two-tier system of health care, which is promoted by only one party, Stephen Harper's Conservatives -- even though they are pretending to support Medicare during this election -- must be non-partisan.” (Quote from: The bias, the blank spots and the damage. By Donald Gutstein Published: January 6, 2006 TheTyee.ca) Canadian Action Party declares, “Tommy Douglas was an advocate of using the Bank of Canada properly to support the social programs Canadians want. The ideals this great man espoused are a reflection of Canadian values, as indicated by the overwhelming support of him as the ‘Greatest Canadian’. The CBC has either been incompetent, unfair, or they have become the incredibly biased spokesperson for the corporate powers behind our government.” -30- Contact: Leader, Constance (Connie) Fogal Telephone (604) 872 2128 home; Fax: (604) 872 1504 E-mail: conniefogal@telus.net Head Office #385- 916 West Broadway, Vancouver B.C. V5Z1K7 Tel: (604) 708-3372;Fax: (604) 872 1504; e- mail: info@canadianactionparty.ca www.canadianactionparty.ca Catherine Whelan Costen, Canadian Action Party President & Communications Director cathpublish@wildroseinternet.ca Ph: 403-660-0449 *authorized by Registered Agent of Canadian Action Party link to article on vive http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060106103236305 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 9, 2006]

Note: www.canadianactionparty.ca http://www.vivelecanada...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:26 pm
    Cathy, you are assuming that CBC employees have a spine, are able to do more than what they are told, and are not in disagreement with their Liberal masters who sign their guarenteed paychecks!

    In other words, they are good little canadians, just doing what they're told.

    What makes you think your statement of CAP's demands to alter the approved state propoganda will cause anyting to change?

  2. Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:05 am
    Wow, someone dares to question the great Tommy Douglas. I guess critical thinking and open debate aren't things CAP values. Although I guess since now that your party's founder is blowing the lid off of America's plans to shoot down UFO's, CAP is looking for other heroes to venerate, even if they come from other parties.

    I guess that goes to show that CAP is just another social-democrat party, albeit one that places it emphasis on different things than the NDP does (at least in its post-Waffle incarnation).

  3. Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 am
    CBC employees should put in a bid for 'Mother Corpse' if they want to 'take back our airwaves' or some such nonsense.

    Why not? They could run all the biased half-baked programming they want and no one could tell them different.

  4. Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:30 am
    I am certainly an advocate of Canadians to "take back" their public broadcaster CBC and please *do not* forget la SRC specially hors-Québec ;-) . Am not sure however about the effectiveness of telling "CBC Employees to take back our airwaves". Keeping their monopoly unchallenged or desparately trying to participate in these bogus "debates" is not healthy either. <p> Being the first political party to articulate and live by new media reform policies would be far more effective IMHO. No political party has come close to the topic of <a href="http://adbusters.org/metas/psycho/mediacarta/pdf/MediaCarta.pdf">reclaiming our "mental environment"</a> IMHO. Other than Catherine's fully engaged participation to Vive NGO new media, is CAP really any better? Could the CAP party leader help clarify their new media policy right here on Vive? <p> I am still waiting for Harris and Layton to show up here on Vive rather than on photo-ops racing in airport, holding babies, talking to seniors, mingling with the canadian workforce. Are they all that different from Martin, Harper and pourquoi pas, monsieur Duceppe? Le Canard has done its full share on the matter of new media reform; it will however not participate in the leaders`s debate and will not present candidates either ;-)<p>---<br>"We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  5. Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:36 am
    The CAP welcomes debate, because the CAP at the end of the day has right on its side. Debate all you want. Public health care is better for all of the people! And everyone knows it! But what many don`t know is this- that universal public health care is being purposely eroded by profit mongers, and that NAFTA is the real enemy of public health care! We can afford to ratify the Romanow Report. To say that we can`t is a myth. Most people here think that Trudeau is my political hero. Well, he`s up there, but NOBODY tops Tommy Douglas!!! Hey, public health care, when administered correctly, as opposed to what we`re seeing now from the profit before people parasites, is cheaper even for rich folks! So what`s the problem, other than how the current puppets run health care?

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  6. Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:00 am
    Absolutely Dave, Tommy Douglas stood for Canadians, and he had a backbone, and he was more than Healthcare, which if the CBC was being open to expose both sides, they would have aired his life story to balance the propaganda called Medicare Schmedicare...but they did not...

    As for why call on the employees...because they are asking for support, they are asking for politicians to talk about CBC, they asked for support during the lockout...they are also saying that no politicians are listening which is untrue...CAP has been listening...CBC employees do have the ability to speak out...I know they can't change it from within, but they can declare the ties that bind them to the public...that would be a start...

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  7. Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:52 am
    Breaking News! This just in! Connie Fogal had a piece of spinach stuck to her teeth! Film at 11! We now return you to your…This just in! Connie Fogal stepped in a puddle with suede shoes! Cap officials believe them to be ruined… CBC Hockey night will return after this brief commercial mess…Wait, this just in! Connie Fogal has run out Kleenex!…

  8. Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:18 am
    "Debate all you want. Public health care is better for all of the people! And everyone knows it!"

    Clearly you're *not* interested in debate. You seem to believe that the Canada Health Act was writted on stone tablets.

    Public single-payer insurance? Absolutely! State-owned providers of health-care services? Sure, but not exclusively. The private sector can play a useful role as well.

    Two different issues, each a debate onto itself. I get very annoyed with this knee-jerk "private bad" attitude that Medicare absolutists take, and the *deliberate* blurring of the *separate* issues of insurance and service provision.

    Not everyone who delivers health care services has to be a unionized government employee.

  9. Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:47 am
    Catherine: Good letter, I have written at least four letter to the CBC directly with my complaints. I have written their Ombudsman and am now in the process of filing a complaint with the CRTC .

    I am not willing to continue to support this public broadcaster, when they are not willing to support the public who funds them.

    It is time they pulled their head out of the Liberal Parties ass. I want equal time for all who run in this election and that the bottom line.

    ---
    Good government is not a party government

  10. Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:51 am
    I have been sending several letters too to complain. We have to keep the pressure.

  11. Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:06 pm
    What? I`m interested in debate. C`mon. Convince me how private health care will benefit us all. Frankly, I`ve heard the arguments by the profit mongers. I see the damage done by NAFTA. 600,000 US citizens go bankrupt because they couldn`t pay their medical bills, thanks to a private system. Sure, if you`re rich, you`ve got no worries in a private system. But what about the majority of people? Who cares, right? Private companies won`t stop to worry about how the average joe or the poor can afford health care. Tommy Douglas` system worked, and when it spread across Canada, it was the envy of the world- until the puppet politicians who work for their corporate privatizing masters needlesly and deliberately started to dismantle the system.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  12. Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:39 pm
    "I see the damage done by NAFTA. 600,000 US citizens go bankrupt because they couldn`t pay their medical bills, thanks to a private system."

    Thanks to a private *INSURANCE* system, yes. Still blurring the lines, I see.

    "Tommy Douglas` system worked, and when it spread across Canada, it was the envy of the world-"

    No, it wasn't. Other countries had socialized medicine too, and some even came up with private-public mixes which work *better* than the Canadian system.

    "Private companies won`t stop to worry about how the average joe or the poor can afford health care."

    And politicans and government bureaucrats don't worry about the waiting lists, as long as they keep their jobs and can afford to go down to the States to get the treatments *they* need.

    Medicare is a program that somehow became a religion. That's why a nation shouldn't tie its identity to a set of social programs. It shuts down debate on how to make these systems more efficient and effective.

    Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

  13. Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:57 am
    Our medical system was the envy of the world in its heyday. Um, no, not blurring anything here. Hospitals are private in the US. P3`s are more expensive than a public system, given that that profit thing comes in again. But tell me, what should a nation tie it`s identity to other than how well it treats its citizens?

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  14. Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:55 pm
    I don't know, maybe something like a common culture and history. And a nation that seeks to control *every* aspeect of the lives of its citizens using punishments and incentives as motivation cannot be said to be treating its citizens well.

    There is a difference between big government and good government. Government is best when it helps citizens attain self-sufficiency. The (admittedly unattainable) goal of government should be to render itself obsolete, or at least to approach obsolescence. Creating and perpetuating a culture of dependency in order to feed a narcissistic desire on the part of politicians, bureaucrats and elites for control over us has been the downfall of our society.

    They've convinced us we need to keep the training wheels on. That's because they're afraid of our knowing how to ride unassisted.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news