Q: It seems that the attacks and killings in Iraq are growing. What should a current-events buff make of it?
A: Higher levels of violence indicate that the terrorists are growing weaker and more desperate. We should welcome news of larger slaughters as proof of progress and an indication that our troops will be home sooner.
Q: Sooner than what?
A: Sooner than soon. Just remember the good news is that 3,149 Iraqi civilians were killed in June, up from 2,669 in May. Washington Middle East experts are predicting 6,000 a month in the near future and 15,000 by Election Day.
Q: Is Iraq near civil war?
A: No. A civil war must be declared by both sides, and since Iraq has one government that is too weak to do anything anyway, a civil war is impossible.
Q: Please help us to understand how they can be trying Saddam Hussein for killing 148 people 24 years ago when on some days they are killing twice as many in Iraq now. Does that make sense to you?
A: You have to take the long view. Remember, we are in Iraq to stay the course. By 2030 C.E., which is 24 years from now, anyone killing so much as a goat will be tried and convicted. Do not allow miscellaneous factoids to confuse you. Stay focused and remain good to go where the Commander in Chief points.
Q: What are some of the signs that show we are winning the war in Iraq?
A: When we first liberated Iraq, the locals only tried to kill American military and were often not successful. Over time they have gotten better at that, which is proof of how American foreign aid is working. But the sign of the biggest improvement is that the Iraqis are now killing each other. In the bad old pre-American days, a few of them under Saddam Hussein's orders used to kill other Iraqis, but most Iraqis were forbidden to kill each other, but now, under democracy, all can slaughter each other. And next year there will be vastly improved electric service.
Q: What is an asymmetrical war?
A: There are several kinds of asymmetrical wars. One kind is when normal people fight dwarfs and midgets. Another kind is when normal people fight hunchbacks and or persons who have one leg shorter than the other. Another form of asymmetrical war is when Christians and Jews, generally thought of as white men, fight Arabs, generally not thought of as particularly white. Does that answer your question?
Q: What is the Geneva Convention?
A: The so-called Geneva Convention is held annually on a rotating basis by the pharmaceutical industry in Geneva, Ill., Geneva, Ohio, Geneva, N.Y., Lake Geneva, Wis., and Geneva, Switzerland. At these conventions, the delegates discuss questions of biomedical ethics.
CONTINUED
http://www.observer.com/20060814/20060814_Nicholas_von_Hoffman_opinions_vonhoffman.asp
Note: http://www.observer.com...

---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
2) Suicidal, murdering, religious fundamentalists who consider it a religious duty to kill anyone more progressive than Attila the Hun, including you liberals and last remnants of the failed Left.
3) The apologists for murder and genocide (it's not their fault, its George Bush and America's).
4) The religious left who are totally politicized and as deft as any propaganda machine going complaining that the religious right might someday win something (which seems remote since the last time they won anything, anywhere was about two centuries ago - they say "under God" now which seems a pretty inconsequential victory. But they have made great strides in the Middle East and have become the Left's natural allies, which is why such a stupid opinion as this article has any legs at all. This guy would have been laughed off the planet except the America bad mantra has become the main theme for an underachieving, selectively educated (East German style) generation propagandized by its parents and teachers.
5) The millionaire and billionaire socialists who finance the left’s campaign against anything that just might help the average person and whose causes have become paramount goals in today’s radical politics. These are money traders and energy traders, for Christ sake. I guess the left cause now is to get them to be successful Kyoto carbon credit traders too. (Ah, money for nothing, the new old alternative)
6) The prosperous hypocritical gurus that have used honest opinion to enrich themselves doing exactly what they speak against (Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Barbra Streisand, Naomi Klein, and about a million others) It’s a dynamic growth industry that we pay an enormous price for since they control governmental spending and decide what else and where we will just have to spend more.
7) The media suicidalists who believe the government has no right to know if bin Laden is calling you on the phone, and then will publish how to avoid the world’s meager security attempts.
I could go on and on. It’s not an axis. It’s more like the double helix of one of nature’s many dead ends. It is really frightening.
Oh BUT Tillerman, You do!
and in ever decxreasing circles till you disapear up ... well no need to be too graphic
---
We have met the enemy and he is us
Pogo
A mind is a fire to be kindled, not a vessel to be filled.
Plutarch
Thanks for that Diogenes and Vive Le Canada.
Mike
Winnipeg
1) Is the country in question a democracy?
2) Is that democracy the kind of democracy we want?
3) Does the country in question treat US companies like royalty?
4) Has the country in question handed over all sovereignty to the US?
5) Has the country in question ever voted aginst the US in the UN?
6) Is the population mostly white?
7) Does the US own all natural resources in said country?
9) Can the current President find it on the map without CNN's assistance?
10) Does Dick Cheyney like them?
11) If the answer to ANY of the above is NO, start immediate destabilazion, and commence regime change policies.
12) If regime change fails, nuke them till they glow.
I hope this brief primer succeeds in it's aim of making US Foreign Policy understandable for you, the home viwer.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush