Last week's Palestinian election has presented just the sort of potentially explosive situation where tanks offer no help, but where effective diplomacy could make a difference.
In a column in The Globe and Mail, Palestinian-born journalist Rami Khouri argued for the world to avoid hysteria and calmly craft a process for recognizing and achieving legitimate Israeli and Palestinian rights. He identified three nations capable of playing a pivotal mediating role: Sweden, Norway and Canada.
In fact, Canada has been inching away from its traditional, respected role as an “honest broker” in the Middle East — a role established in the 1950s when former Prime Minister Lester Pearson won the Nobel Peace Prize for helping to defuse the Suez Crisis.
http://www.rabble.ca/columnists_full.shtml?x=46264
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 3, 2006]
Note: http://www.rabble.ca/co...

---
Vera Gottlieb
We (EU, US, CA, and Japan) are not so much threatening sanctions as we are witholding massive aid/subsidy. Nevertheless, even if we gave them no money, we are still allowed to disagree with a democratically elected gov't.
I respect Palestenians right to elect a band of terrorists who have openly declared their intention to destroy the state of Israel (read their charter). Where I part company is the suggestion that we have to continue to provide them with money. Just because they elected Hamas, it doesn't mean we have to enable the suicide bombing dealth cult. Like the Danish cartoon says: "al-ah is running out of virgins".