U.S. Defends Detentions At Airports

Posted on Thursday, August 11 at 13:25 by Ed Deak
Syrian and Canadian officials have cleared Mr. Arar, 35, of any terrorist connections, but United States officials maintain that "clear and unequivocal" but classified evidence shows that he is a Qaeda member. They are seeking dismissal of his lawsuit, in part through the rare assertion of a "state secrets" privilege. The case is the first civil suit to challenge the practice known as "extraordinary rendition," in which terror suspects have been transferred for questioning to countries known for torture. After considering legal briefs, Judge David G. Trager of United States District Court prepared several written questions for lawyers on both sides to address further, including one that focused pointedly on Mr. Arar's accusations of illegal treatment in New York. He says he was deprived of sleep and food and was coercively interrogated for days at the airport and at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn when he was not allowed to call a lawyer, his family or the Canadian consul. "Would not such treatment of a detainee - in any context, criminal, civil, immigration or otherwise - violate both the Constitution and clearly established case law?" Judge Trager asked. The reply by Mary Mason, a senior trial lawyer for the government, was that it would not. Legally, she said, anyone who presents a foreign passport at an American airport, even to make a connecting flight to another country, is seeking admission to the United States. If the government decides that the passenger is an "inadmissible alien," he remains legally outside the United States - and outside the reach of the Constitution - even if he is being held in a Brooklyn jail. Even if they are wrongly or illegally designated inadmissible, the government's papers say, such aliens have at most a right against "gross physical abuse." Under immigration law, Ms. Mason asserted, Mr. Arar was afforded "ample" due process when he was given five days to challenge an order finding him inadmissible. "The burden of proof is on the alien to demonstrate his admissibility," Ms. Mason said, "and he did not do that." "Do you do this to all people on a connecting flight?" Judge Trager asked, raising his eyebrows. "Yes, all have to show admissibility," Ms. Mason replied. In some ways, she asserted, Mr. Arar had more rights than a United States citizen, because he could have challenged his deportation to Syria, which he had left as a teenager, under the Convention Against Torture. He also had 30 days to challenge his removal, she said. But David Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University who argued on behalf of Mr. Arar and the Center for Constitutional Rights, contended that the government had denied Mr. Arar a meaningful chance to be heard, first by refusing to let him call a lawyer, and later by lying to the lawyer about his whereabouts. Mr. Arar, who had been told he would be deported to Canada, was not handed a final order sending him to Syria until he was in handcuffs on the private jet that took him away, Mr. Cole said, while his lawyer was told he had been sent to a jail in New Jersey. "We can't take a citizen, pick him up at J.F.K. and send him to Syria to be tortured," he said. "We can't hold against Mr. Arar the failure to file a motion for review when he's locked up in a gravelike cell in Syria." Dennis Barghaan, who represents former Attorney General John Ashcroft, one of the federal officials being sued for damages in the case, argued that Congress and recent judicial decisions tell federal courts "keep your nose out" of foreign affairs and national security questions, like those in this case. At several points the judge seemed to echo such concerns. He said he had refused to read a letter from the plaintiffs detailing testimony before a Canadian board of inquiry into Mr. Arar's case because he did not know how to deal with questions that might require the government to confirm or deny classified information. "How am I going to handle that?" he asked, rubbing his forehead and furrowing his brow before adjourning the hearing. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/10/nyregion/10civil.html?oref=login

Note: http://www.nytimes.com/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:15 am
    You could not pay me enough to make me set foot in the US! Not even to change planes.

    ---
    Vera Gottlieb

  2. Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:40 pm
    Any country would detain or arrest terrorists or criminals as soon as they arrived in that country, Canada is the exception because our government doesn't really care that much about our security, but most real nations would do this.

  3. Sat Aug 13, 2005 12:39 am
    Poor Vera won't step inside the US even to change planes.
    This is typical of the tripe that is typical of this website. Me thinks many Canadians are a bunch of rednecks.
    The United States is the most wonderful travel destination.
    San Francisco, New York City, the New York Philharmonic just for starters. The closed minds of fellow Canadians is quite disturbing. It is great fun to travel to America and Europe but it is best to leave the Canadian stuff at home. In America they think I'm American and in England they think I'm American. I don't correct them and I have great talks and fun. I shall repeat kind hearts. Leave the Canadian attitudes and stuff at home.

  4. by avatar Milton
    Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:25 pm
    Oh yea, anon, you are so brave that you don't have enough guts to post your name with your innuendo. I've been to the US too and it was the people that I met that made the journey worthwhile. Turn a tap on in Philly or New York or Boston or Washington.... and smell the superchlorinated water that doesn't taste like water. Go to the beach and avoid stepping in the sewage that comes in with the tide and try not to swallow any of it if you dare to swim in the cesspool that they call the ocean.

    I wouldn't go to the US these days though. I wouldn't have gone to nazi Germany in 1939 either.

  5. Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:58 pm
    Methinks you know very little about which you speak dear Milton. Doesn't matter to you does it. The world's a simple place that is easily sorted and understood. Wonderful! And the point of your rant was what exactly Milton? If you actually consider the 1939 reference valid I'd seriously question your intelligence and/or sanity. You'd do well to learn a little more before you take leaps.

  6. Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:42 pm
    Could you spread your ideas among your fellow Canucks?

    Help us Americans trying to keep Canuks out of our borders.

    The very thought of entering Canada makes me want to puke.

  7. Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:20 pm
    Milton, at least if you go to the U.S. you will be allowed to return to Canada. If you would have gone to 1939 Germany, they would have put you in an oven.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news