At stake is the legacy of a century of nation-builders and the cornerstone of the Canadian idea: that our social contract is one of shared destiny. Historical accounts vary, but the least biased agree that the dominant cultures share a destiny with aboriginal peoples, that Quebec and English Canada are more similar than different, and that our cities and rural communities are not at odds with each other. Our destiny is even intertwined with that of our neighbours to the south. Above all, shared destiny is not some sentimental idea. Rather, it is grounded in history and based on the notion that the sum of Canada is greater than its remarkably diverse parts. Against a backdrop of individual and community proclivities and of divergent belief systems, shared destiny has been accepted as necessary for survival, growth, and what we must do for each other to build an exceptional nation.
This sense of Canadian nationhood wasn't created or recognized overnight. It was slow to evolve, is a work in progress, and is not without blemishes. A look in the rear-view mirror shows the difficulties and imperfections of our journey. The imposition of a head tax on Chinese immigrants and the internment of Japanese-Canadians during World War II are two tragic examples. Our recurring promises to make good on commitments to aboriginal peoples remain unfulfilled. There are many other instances of error and unfinished business. Still, informed by the realization that by working together we can achieve balance, collaboration, and a more evolved sense of inclusion and rights, we have created a more equitable society.
Canada is a work in progress that must be guided by a clear understanding of our past and a determination to build upon it. The land Jacques Cartier discovered almost 500 years ago was one of the most diverse on earth. The continent was home to more nations than Europe has today, over fifty languages, and was a vast archipelago of cultures, religions, and social systems. We did not invent multiculturalism, we joined it in progress. A clash of empires planted English and French settlers alongside each other in an uneasy duality. Two rival nationalities—which had spent centuries fighting each other elsewhere—were here obliged to coexist and to develop a civil society.
http://www.walrusmagazine.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/16/0247214
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on May 22, 2006]
Note: http://www.walrusmagazi...

It would have been nice, if Mr. Romanov might have examined his OWN involvement with the destruction of the 'Canadian idea' and it's 'social contract'.
Part of the blame goes to Third Way managers like Romanov, Rae, Harcourt, Doer who have so manipulated the notion of the social contract, that any 'social' aspect of THEIR governments had been reduced to little more than an 'sharp penciled HR department' hellbent on saving a buck at the expense of aboriginals, the poor, women, homeless, low wage workers, shrinking middle classes, etc.
Yeah we know Roy...famous last words of <i>faux</i> social democrats: coulda, woulda, shoulda
---
RickW