CAFTA Helps Powerful U.S. Drug Industry

Posted on Tuesday, June 28 at 13:32 by sthompson
Guatemala -- with an economy the size of Bismarck, N.D., and a population poorer than any U.S. community -- seems to be the Chosen One. The Washington Post's Harold Meyerson pointed out that the U.S. trade representative has become "the sales rep for the pharmaceutical industry." The USTR, in fact, has an office, senior officer for Asia-Pacific and pharmaceutical policy, dedicated to assisting the already powerful U.S. drug industry. Last year, the Guatemalan Congress passed legislation to allow the sale of generic drugs to give its citizens more consumer choice and to bring down the price of name-brand drugs. Consumers in Guatemala cheered them on. Then the U.S. drug industry and its allies in the Bush administration moved in. Even though international trade law and World Trade Organization rules allow the sale of generics in member countries, the U.S. trade representative told Guatemalan leaders that there will be no Central American Free Trade Agreement unless the Guatemalan government gives the drug companies what they want. Not surprising, and against the vociferous opposition of millions of Guatemalans, the government repealed its own public health law. This kind of strategy -- presidents named Bush teaming up with the prescription drug industry -- is not a new thing. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush told Canadians that, unless they repealed their compulsory license law that ensured significantly lower prescription drug prices for Canadians than Americans were paying, Canada would be excluded from the North American Free Trade Agreement. Ottawa repealed its law and soon after Canada was included in the NAFTA agreement. Full article: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/230255_cafta28.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on June 28, 2005]

Note: http://seattlepi.nwsour...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:13 pm
    Man, we should have resisted Bush I. We`d still have cheaper drugs- and no NAFTA!!!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:55 am
    How many new life saving drugs does Canada produce each year? I'll give you a hint, it rhymes with Toronto.

  3. Wed Jun 29, 2005 3:41 pm
    Well, least year there was that new drug for the treatment of breast cancer, but I don't think it's name rhymes with 'Toronto'.

    There was also that new retroviral drug that was developed to combat the anti-biotic resistant strain of tuberculosis that came out of the Russian prison system, but it doesn't rhyme with Toronto.

    Which one did you mean?


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  4. Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:20 pm
    Does it rhyme with celebrex and vioxx?

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news