The Progressive Canadians is a reaction to that merger, and the subsequent leadership victory last week of former Alliance chief Stephen Harper, Hueglin said.
"What this is is a resurrection, a continuation of what was extinguished on a Sunday, a day of infamy, Dec. 7," Hueglin said. "It is to have this party there, so that if the other one falls apart, we're there."
Hueglin and a small group of disgruntled former Tories successfully registered their new political entity with Elections Canada.
Now the PCs are seeking 50 candidates to carry the standard in the next federal election and make them eligible for all rights and privileges under the Elections Act.
"There are many people who do not have a party at this point that they feel comfortable voting for," he said.
Hueglin resisted the merger of his old party with the Canadian Alliance. He vowed - like other diehard Tories - to have nothing to do with the new party.
But he did vote in the local Conservative party's nomination meeting earlier this month, something he said had more to do with his friendship with Conservative candidate Rob Nicholson than support for the new party.
For his part, Nicholson said he wasn't sure what kind of impact the new group would have.
"I don't know much about them," Nicholson said.
"People who supported the old Progressive Conservative or the old Canadian Alliance parties know who to vote for," he said.
Hueglin and the Progressive Canadians - about 300 across Canada - created the new entity "to contest the middle" against the Liberal party, Hueglin said.
"If the Liberals tar this new party as being Reform III, as right wing as the NDP is left wing, then there is nothing in the centre to contest the Liberals," said Hueglin.
"That's why our aim is to become a registered party at the end of the election, so there will be on the books a centrist, moderate party."
Hueglin claims about a dozen people across the country - most in southwestern Ontario - have expressed an interest in being candidates.
Putting PC Party on ballots seems to have the potential to confuse voters who won't make the distinction between the old Progressive Conservatives and the new Progressive Canadians.
"It might. In the opinion of the chief electoral officer, it's OK," Hueglin said.
- With files from the Canadian Press
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
I am merely surprised that people who have voted NDP in the past would even think about voting for someone else, as Layton is (IMO) the best leader they've had since Broadbent, and much better than Lewis before him. Also, Broadbent wavered on the FTA due to his union supporters, who now have less influence over the party, by law, so we'll see. I just wish the NDP hadn't lost Broadbent when they did, with no young, strong leader to replace him. The two leaders that followed him were women, which may still be a big disadvantage, good or bad. They were good MPs, but they didn't even have skills to lead. A socialist party can't make itself irrelevant like ithat. The country suffered for it.
If we don't support a third party, we're simply conceeding to the Americanizers before we've even started. Layton just needs to remember more than the environmental issues, as those are less-important to many rural citizens, as they don't live in congested, polluted cities of 4 million people, generally.
Besides PR, voting NDP proves to the population that the majority DO NOT support Mr. Martin, even if Layton doesn't win.
Kevin
Nothing like a great debate to wake up to. Well first of all I think that the Progressive Canadain Party is probably the start of that one big party that Paul Hellyer was talking about. In its formation it has at least two of the ingredients that Paul was fighting for: the name progressive is a part of the name of the new party, and the party is centralist and moderate. The last thing he wanted was that a new constitution be provided. I am sure that this will happen with the help of new members. So everything could be in place.
I also believe that David Orchard and the others will come on board once the Progressive Conservative case is heard at the end of April whatever way it turns out. You can be rest assured that it will be a long day in hell before the New Conservative party gives up the rights to the Progressive Conservative name.
For Whelan: You have to remember that whatever happens, the PC's are going back to their roots before the Mulroney's days.If this was not the plan they would be a member of the new conservative party. If you are in on the ground floor we can ensure that this happens. The people of Canada are looking for that centralist, moderate party, not the new conservative republican party who are going to have moderate policies for the election campaign and if they get to form goverment will revert to their present policies, then look out. Nor the NDP, they are far left in the eyes of most Canadians. The Progressive Canadian Party will be in the Center to fight the liberals on their own turf. If they are not, all I can say is get ready for another liberal government.
All I can say is lets get behind the PC's and lets get this party moving. It is the hope for now and the future.
As for the NDP, it's ridiculous to call them far-left, and only fear-mongering keeps people thinking that way. Most Canadians are too selfish to pay more taxes. It's mostly business that would pick up the extra tab anyway, but Layton isn't even campaigning on tax increases. The disrespect most PCs have for the NDP is quite pathological. You make me laugh. What's with the attitude? The new PCs have just as much a chance of disappearing as they do of forming government.
"Canadians want a moderate government." HAHAHAHAHAHAH... I guess Canadians are boring! The old Tories did a good job, and only the shear boredom of their persona and attitude allowed them to be pushed around as they were. THEY lost the ability to govern, because since Diefenbaker, they've sold themselves to American interests. Moderate government. What are you trying to do, make us as emotionless as the Swedish? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
How are you this fine day?
It doesn't matter what I or you think it is the public doing the voting. Perception is the same as being. So after all of the scandal and everything else we see going on in Ottawa the NDP has stalled. So it is obvious that Jack Layton cannot talk people into voting for him. As I said before the people will not vote for the NDP, that is a fact, regardless of who tarred and feathered who they will not form a federal government. Bob Standfield on his worse day as leader of the PC Party had 109 seats in Parliament.
Now I do agree with you that if David Orchard would come on board that the Progressive Canadian Party would have a good chance and if we go back to the party of John Diefenbaker we would have a winning combination. But what we have now is everyone standing around wondering what we are going to do to get a good alternative. Well the Progressive Canadians have done something. If people would get on board we can move the party more towards what we are looking for. We can introduce new policies, amendments to the constitution, etc. I am sure that the party would be opened to that.
Hell, we can also call ourselves whatever we want i.e progressive Liberals, progressive conservatives, progressive Democrats etc all running as candidates for the Progressive Canadian Party. If we want to create that Big tent party we have to do so from within.
Unfortunately for the NDP if it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, It is a Duck.
Personally I think realistically we have to vote for the NDP in order to get some kind of change. Its clear that the NDP will gain more seats then last election. The more seats they get the better it is for some kind of change to happen.
Whether we end up with a manority government with Libearl/NDP or if we end up with a majority Liberal with the NDP having more seats then they presently do. They should be able to influence some change, and bring the PR voting system that we need in Canada. This will be good for new parties like the new parties we have already discussed.
My vote is for the NDP this election cause its really the only option for change.
Kevin
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?