Just Another Brick In The Wall

Posted on Wednesday, November 08 at 16:35 by Mike Nickerson
It certainly had nothing to do with the issue of Kyoto being on the agenda, as Jason Kenney, Harper’s fact-challenged parliamentary secretary, went to great pains to make clear. Harper didn’t even know they were going to discuss the environment, or so Kenney says, and it doesn’t matter anyway, because Harper will be talking with a number of EU leaders next year, so what’s the fuss? For the bricks-and-mortar-obsessed Conservative government, perhaps nothing, but for anyone concerned about our already strained relations with the EU, quite a bit. No one outside of the PMO is buying the idea that it’s imperative for Harper to stay on Parliament Hill for an extra few days while his legislatively challenged government remains log jammed and ineffective, due in no small part to Harper’s inability to compromise. Yet, no one is going to attempt a confidence vote until at least next spring (despite Jack Layton’s recent sabre-rattling to the contrary), and Harper’s time would be better spent smoothing some of the European feathers he managed to ruffle over the summer, instead of more finger-waving rhetoric in the Commons accusing the opposition of doing what he argued as opposition leader it should do: namely not just blindly sign off on the government’s agenda, but debate it. But blind acceptance of his agenda is just what Harper would like, not just at home, but by the EU and the world at large. Contemptuous of critique at the best of times, the Prime Minster knew full well that Kyoto was on the agenda, and some harsh criticism awaited him in Finland. Much as with the 2006 International AIDS Conference, the prospect of criticism has the curious effect of turning Harper not so much into a political turtle, but into a dismissive autocrat willing to wall off his opposition rather than confront it when it doesn’t suit him. It’s a tactic that the parliamentary press corps, a group of ink-stained wretches left to fight for scraps of news outside the fortress walls, knows all too well. So too does Dalton McGuinty and his Liberal government, now that the Great Wall of Ontario seems well and truly cemented between Ottawa and Queen’s Park. Federal ministers, taking their cue from the prime ministerial inner sanctum, have been giving their Ontario counterparts quick and nasty escorts past the castle gates, barring them from the fortress until Ontario elects a government more to Ottawa’s liking. And AIDS funding has become nothing more than a promise and a dream for the world’s AIDS suffers, waiting for them, if not at the end of the proverbial rainbow, then somewhere over the walls of the PMO. Now Europe and a questioning world, all wondering what happened to Canada and its commitment to the environment, are left to guess what’s going on with an anything-but-transparent government. Why, they must be wondering, is Canada about to break its international treaty obligations for the first time in its history? Short of satellite imagery to help them see over Harper’s self-constructed wall of insular foreign policy, they’ll just have to keep wondering until he lets them in. Of course, with the ever-growing crowd being left to cool its collective heels outside Fort Harper, they’ll just have to take a number. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 9, 2006]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:04 am
    It's always amazed me how it takes just a few Government Officials to negatively affect world opinion about a country. Canadians deserve to be represented in a much better light than they are currently being represented.

    Probably for the first time in its history, Canada is being portrayed as a country which lacks compassion for humanity. It remains to be seen if today's apathetic masses will be content with wearing this label.

  2. Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:05 am
    You must be thinking about another country. Look at Canadas contributions to help 3rd world nations with low interest loans. It fell steadily since 1992. Our troop commitment to the UN peacekeeping missions has fallen to 78 soldiers, all the soldiers have been diverted to NATO, which does not "Keep" the peace.

    I've been looking around for awhile at what is going on, some of it is perplexing.

    We have all realized the NAU is a United Nations mandate and the social re-order of our perceptions to allow the loss of our countries is ongoing and will not diminish until they have what they want. John Pastor even lamented that the Nafta countries hadn't made enough gains in developing the NAU fast enough last year.

    So why has Canada reduced its involvement in the IMF and the World Bank, UN functionaries?

    Also, why has Canada decided to regroup with NATO over the United Nations peacekeeping forces? Sure the developments of those missions went to hell in a handbasket but when has that ever forced politicians to change their minds.

    There is something going on over our heads, a power struggle has emerged but I haven't figured out yet who the players are. During the 1990's very little was accomplished re-organizing north america, sure there was Nafta but that was just one of the 1st steps. During the Liberal regime there weren't many organizations involved in this NAU business.

    Then came 9-11 and the SPP just 8 months later and the sudden proliferation of all its working groups came into being in 2002, Organized to be sure. When has government ever been able to move that fast to promote policy made by non-profit orgaizations?

    Certainly they haven't moved that fast with other UN mandates.

  3. Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:04 pm
    It's Robert Pastor, not John. I'd like 5 minutes alone in a small room with this evil sob.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news