Canadian Grassroots And "Freedom"

Posted on Monday, January 10 at 13:37 by FurGaia
Yet,

If I were asked to choose one of Noam Chomsky's major contributions to the world, it would be the fact that he has unmasked the ugly, manipulative, ruthless universe that exists behind that beautiful, sunny word "freedom". He has done this rationally and empirically. The mass of evidence he has marshaled to construct his case is formidable. Terrifying, actually. The starting premise of Chomsky's method is not ideological, but it is intensely political. He embarks on his course of inquiry with an anarchist's instinctive mistrust of power. He takes us on a tour through the bog of the U.S. establishment, and leads us through the dizzying maze of corridors that connects the government, big business, and the business of managing public opinion.

Chomsky shows us how phrases like "free speech", the "free market", and the "free world" have little, if anything, to do with freedom. He shows us that, among the myriad freedoms claimed by the U.S. government are the freedom to murder, annihilate, and dominate other people. The freedom to finance and sponsor despots and dictators across the world. The freedom to train, arm, and shelter terrorists. The freedom to topple democratically elected governments. The freedom to amass and use weapons of mass destruction — chemical, biological, and nuclear. The freedom to go to war against any country whose government it disagrees with. And, most terrible of all, the freedom to commit these crimes against humanity in the name of "justice", in the name of "righteousness", in the name of "freedom". Arundathi Roy in The loneliness of Noam Chomsky.

The "Freedom" meme has crept northwards into Canada. All political parties, whether liberal or conservative, in-between or neither, sooner or later refer to "Freedom" in one way or another, some more than others. Whether it is the "Good Freedom" or the "Bad Freedom" is obviously subject to each person’s frame of reference. One website in particular is interesting. It is a "grassroots" conservative website but well-worth visiting by progressives for what it may teach them about "Freedom" and on ways to promote their own version of it.

This site has power. The look is indeed "grassroots" but the technology is very advanced. It promotes its ideas and ideology naturally but its power resides in the ways that it entices individual participation in the political process, satisfaction guaranteed, at the click of a button!

Hence you too can "beecome" (sic: something about "Society" being a "Beehive", I guess) a "Freedom Adcovate" via this group that presents itself thus:

We are a faith-based, non-partisan, multi-partisan, grassroots political lobby, legal services, consulting, and communications organization.

It has been said that those who choose to not participate in the political process are destined to be ruled by those who do participate.

DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO BE ENSLAVED AND MANIPULATED BY "THEM"? (emphasis theirs)

Strategically speaking, one must admit that that website’s one-per-issue "Click Here" feature at the very top is truly awesome! Republican strategists now admit that the 2004 campaign began the day Bush moved to the White House in 2000. The campaign for our next election here in Canada has already started as far as conservatives are concerned. That "grassroots" website is very telling. As more and more such conservative websites are constructed over the coming months and with such capability, the impact of the conservative voice on the political scene will indeed be something to be reckoned with. If Canadian progressives, "grassroots" or otherwise, have not yet learned how to do that on their websites, they certainly should … and one would guess sooner rather than later if they don’t want to be overcome (and overwhelmed) by that particular brand of "Freedom"!

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:50 pm
    I quite liked the notion of "freedom fries".....

    ---
    RickW

  2. by RPW
    Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
    The anti-dote:<br />
    <a href="http://www.lyingliar.com/">http://www.lyingliar.com/</a><p>---<br>RickW

  3. Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:46 am
    Canadians are frightened of freedom and need a nanny gov't to take care of them from cradle to grave - freedom is for people who want to stand on their own two feet, not Canadians.

  4. Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:30 am
    I'd be interested in knowing what country doesn't have a nanny state. In the case of the United States, it's an abusive alcoholic father.

  5. Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:38 am
    canada.grassroots.ca, good find Furgaia

    problem with calling itself grassroots, can't very well put up stories from Mainstream media to support its case, now can they? but they do. Then there's the hooey about a bunch of 'faith based' news, why? when its common knowledge the evangelical religions have been politizied by the warmongoring military/industrial complex and Zionists.

    the web is littered with this type of PR trash, put out by people with 6 figure salaries, living in million dollar mansions surrounded by high tech cameras and gated driveways.

    Here is how freedom works today: You have the freedom to 'watch tv' eat 'junk food' and submit yourself to controlling religions, etc. You also have the freedom to put out disinformation on the web.

  6. Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:40 am
    Did anyone else find the above posting incoherent?

  7. Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:53 am
    "this website is not here to protect the republicans"

    yah, and the swiftboat veterens were not out to smear Kerry.

    The rightwing gets more out of touch with reality by the minute.

  8. Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:06 pm
    It's a lot of babble, but it apparently confirms exactly what it purports to condemn - that we do have freedom.

  9. Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:37 pm
    I really don't want to "dis" anybody's else's postings or ideas. The kind of "freedom" I believe in allows for equal representation and presentation of all ideas, with people then making a judgement on which position best serves their own interests. That's freedom. People on opposite sides of the political spectrum sniping at each other only creates white noise, and that serves no constructive purpose.

    The great problem as I see it now is the absolute
    one-sidedness of all mainstream media in this country, and the willingness of that dominent side to supress, frustrate, devalue and attack anyone, anywhere, attempting to express an opinion at variance with their own. That most certainly is NOT freedom, and it absolutely MUST change.

    Those of us who consider ourselves "progressive" must work much harder to bring that change about. Calling the other side scumballs, even if they are, will not achieve anything positive. And the other commentator is right on the money when he or she says that we should be working and organizing every single hour of every day. Nothing very substantive can be accomplished in a few weeks or months immediately prior to an election. Lets get on the job!

  10. Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:56 pm
    The swifties corrected the record about Kerry, who STILL has not released hundreds of pages of his military record, possibly because they show he was given a dishonorable discharge. But anyhow, why are we still talking about this? The guy's a footnote to history.

  11. Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:59 pm
    "People on opposite sides of the political spectrum sniping at each other . . ."

    You mean discussion? The left has always been eager to choke this off in the interest of some higher good.

  12. by RPW
    Wed Jan 12, 2005 2:41 am
    Hmmmm!? You think this is a "veiled" reference to a certain nation to the south? The one where you have to march in lockstep, if you want to be "free", free that is, to do whatever everyone else does, or risk the concentration camps (oops! that's a "closely" guarded secret)

    ---
    RickW

  13. Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:46 am
    <p> <i>Did anyone else find the above posting incoherent?</i> <p> I did! You are right. In my defense, I must say that I was not out to construct an argument as much as to share information with other Canadians who faced with the looming threat of becoming <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/series/borders/"><b>the 51st state</b></a> are coming together <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/staticpages/index.php?page=20030327115630464"> <b>to resist</b></a>. I guess that the incoherence may be due also to the fact that these days I am so overwhelmed by feelings of impending gloom and doom regarding this country and our place in it that I forget that not everybody share such feelings and fail to dot the i's and cross the t's. So let me see if I can make this response a little less incoherent but I can’t promise less "babble". <p> I start from the premise that we live in a time dominated by <a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/American_Empire_page.html">American imperialism</a>. Indeed, according to <a href="http://www.zmag.org/bios/homepage.cfm?authorID=220"> this scholar</a>, the US has long been an Empire and his analysis makes for chilling reading. In <a href="http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/analysis/2003/0712adjusting.htm"><i>Adjusting to Empire</i></a>, Yiffat Susskind writes: <p> <blockquote>Historically, Americans have viewed their country as "a city on a hill" and "the beacon of hope and decency," envisioned in 1630 by John Winthrop, the first governor of Massachusetts. By 1776, the American project had become much grander. "We have it in our power to begin the world all over again," Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense. Over the next 100 years, the US seized the territory of the region’s Indigenous Peoples, swallowed half of Mexico, and tried twice to conquer Canada in a series of wars that politicians defined as "missions" to extend "civilization" and "Anglo-Saxon democracy." So obvious was it to nineteenth-century US leaders that they were chosen by God himself to rule the continent that they named their privileged condition "Manifest Destiny."</blockquote> <p> So much for Empire … Thus one can argue that Canada has always constituted an attractive proposition for the Americans. Today however, in a World with diminishing resources, in particular its water resources, the lure of Canada appears harder to resist by an overreaching Empire. Moreover the justification for "integration" or "annexation" was given a boost by the 9/11 tragedy. In other words, forces for the disintegration of Canada appear to have converged. Furthermore, when one takes into consideration other geopolitical actors, i.e. China, Europe and Russia who are vying for more say in world affairs, one gets the feeling that there is some sense of urgency to the project of "deep integration" or annexation of our country. <p> In that context, just like the last US election has had to deliver, by hook or by crook, a second term to Bush since he had already taken his country’s imperialistic ventures to a all new level, our next election will have to deliver power to the Alliance Conservatives who are proponents of "deep integration". Not that the current Liberals would not do, but "progress" towards "deep integration" would be faster and less problematic with the Alliance Conservatives in power and, as I have mentioned above, Time is of the essence here for one does not know how long the Empire would be able to sustain its current status nor whether there would ever be such a convergence of forces that justify in the eyes of the Empire, and more importantly in the eyes of a section of Canadian themselves, the integration or annexation of Canada. <p> Having said that, it seems logical to conclude that the Alliance Conservatives will benefit from help from their counterparts in the south. Already think tanks have been founded on Canadian soil to promote the Empire, funded by conservative organizations from there. In his speech at the <a href="http://www.aims.ca/library/crowley10th.doc ">10th Anniversary Banquet</a>, the President of the think tank <i>Atlantic Institute for Market Studies</i> (AIMS) announced that it was founded "on the strength of (a) $15,000 cheque from the <a href="http://www.atlasusa.org/">Atlas Economic Research Foundation</a>." Already the media, apart from our beloved CBC when all’s said and done, is falling prey to corporate influence and the <a href="http://www.presscampaign.org/">danger</a> of increasing concentration of media ownership in Canada is very real. Even those that are still independent voices, including the CBC, are targeted to become outlets for the agents and other mouthpiece of the Empire in Canada. In 1999, the "immensely influential conservative think tank", <a href="http://watch.pair.com/heritage.html"><i>The Heritage Foundation</i></a>, published this fascinating lecture delivered by the current president of the Canadian think tank, <i>AIMS</i>: <a href="http://www.heritage.org/about/community/insider/1999/Oct99/ "><i><b>How Can Think Tanks Win Friends and Influence People in the Media?</b></i></a>“. <p> This has been the background of my post on the <b>"Freedom Mantra"</b> as it is my contention that this time around the Alliance Conservatives will benefit from money from influential conservative organizations of the Empire, via think tanks and support for conservative "grassroots" initiatives in Canada, not to mention the friendly corporate sector, as well as from a well-honed campaign strategy tested and proven successful by the Empire itself, albeit with some very controversial components. It is my contention that our next election will be like no other and that this time the fate of our country will hang in the balance and that's why for the Alliance Conservatives, to repeat my own mantra, <a href="http://www.aei.org/publications/bookID.188/book_detail.asp">The Campaign has already started</a>. <p>

  14. Wed Jan 12, 2005 2:05 pm
    Perhaps another "meme" that needs to be examined and challenged is that of using the work "progressive" as a synonym for left-wing, as if socialism equalled "progress" and the world was inevitably marching in the direction of collectvist egalitarianism. From what I've seen of the Canadian left, their idea of "progress" is dragging us back to the tired ideology and ideas of the 1960's. That's certainly not what I call progress.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news