http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2005-12-05T172633Z_01_FLE562794_RTRIDST_0_CANADA-TRADE-LUMBER-COL.XML
From the CBC:
The Department of International Trade said a decision on Monday by a World Trade Organization appellate body supports Canada's position. Canada had argued that procedures used by the U.S. government to establish countervailing duties on Canadian softwood lumber violated WTO rules.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/business/national/2005/12/05/softwood-051205.html
Note: http://ca.today.reuters...
http://www.cbc.ca/story...

"freer" trade, yet the flog the very rules they co-wrote because they work
against them in this case. How typical. How disappointing. Wait until they
formally ask to trade for our water, and we tell them we're looking to sell it
elsewhere. Then they'll wonder why we'd have the audacity to do so.
They're only shooting themselves in the foot. But that's just my opinion.
<sigh>
1) That Canada unfairly subsidizes the logging industry (NAFTA, WTO)
2) That the tarrifs imposed by the US under 1) are unfair (NAFTA)
3) That that the tarriffs imposed from 1) are calculated unfairly (WTO)
4) That the method used to calculate government subsidies that determined the Canadian industry was subsidized are determined unfairly. (NAFTA, WTO)
I believe the article decision applies to #3, and Canada has already won #1 (NAFTA only), #2, and #4. So, if I get this right, the US has only won on #1 under the WTO. NAFTA trumps the WTO decision, which is why the tarrifs are being reduced to 0.8%, sort of.
Clear as mud?
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
Not even that. No wonder the Yanks keep bringing it to court. They will win again and lose again and each time it gives them interest on the money they gained or lost.
One of the former bigwigs of the Fraser Inst. by the name of Arnold Block, published a book some 20 years ago, advocating the sale of all the rivers and lakes as an "environmental protection measure". He also advocated the sale of the oceans, divided between corporations, for the same reason.
Because Adam Smith said so. I don't know where, but they claim this.
The whole softwood lumber issue is part of this plan. For one thing, the lumber companies are doing very well in spite
of all this, they just automate more and fire more Canadians to pay for the duties.
However, this also shows that economies built on exports are sooner, or later, bound to collapse, because some new worms creep out of the woodworks and do it "cheaper"
In any case, the multinationals are just waiting for a stable, capitalist Russian government, when they can move in, drop Canada and mowe down the whole of Siberia without any regulations, for pennies.
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.
Look at politicians and government on both sides of the border- lawyers. Judges are lawyers as well. It behooves them to write agreements that they can dispute continually and fill their pockets with taxpayers dollars They create more problems then they solve.
Some help out. Now the Americans can say we subsidize the industry. Guess what?. They are right. If people around here wouldn't take Canada so seriously one can see the fun value of living here.
<br />
see this...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/08/japan-beef051208.html">http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/08/japan-beef051208.html</a><br />
<br />
It's so similar to the lumber thing it's scary! The two-facedness of it all is astounding. It's nothing but pure, unadulterated hatred of an entire class of people based upon their national origin that has been made by Canadian politicians the very cornerstone of a completely dysfunctional society.
<br />
<a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20051208/japan_USbeefsafety_20051208/20051208?hub=Health">http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20051208/japan_USbeefsafety_20051208/20051208?hub=Health</a><br />
<br />
America's friends the Canadians, as always (eh)...