New World Orleans: Microcosm For The "New America"

Posted on Wednesday, September 07 at 13:38 by whelan costen
The overriding issue that is simply being ignored by the mainstream media is that it was the federal government itself that lowered the guard in cutting off key funding to protect Louisiana from natural disasters. The New Orleans district of the US Army Corps of Engineers bore the brunt of a record $71.2 million reduction in federal funding for fiscal year 2006. The Army Corps of Engineers sought $105 million for hurricane and flood programs in New Orleans, while the White House slashed the request to about $40 million. Congress finally approved $42.2 million, less than half of the agency's request The Bush administration has been cutting funding for federal disaster relief funds since 2001 while doubling funding in other areas to pump up the biggest growth in government for decades, easily outstripping that of Bill Clinton. A report from the Best of New Orleans news website outlines the details. "...Among emergency specialists, 'mitigation' -- the measures taken in advance to minimize the damage caused by natural disasters -- is a crucial part of the strategy to save lives and cut recovery costs. But since 2001, key federal disaster mitigation programs, developed over many years, have been slashed and tossed aside. FEMA's Project Impact, a model mitigation program created by the Clinton administration, has been canceled outright. Federal funding of post-disaster mitigation efforts designed to protect people and property from the next disaster has been cut in half. Communities across the country must now compete for pre-disaster mitigation dollars." The Bush administration's move to merge FEMA with Homeland Security meant that the two had to compete for funding. Straightforward projects that would have massively reduced the devastation we are now seeing, such as raising houses, were cast aside in favor of anti-terrorism measures. In early 2001, FEMA issued a report stating that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in U.S., including a terrorist attack on New York City! "The New Orleans hurricane scenario," The Houston Chronicle wrote in December 2001, "may be the deadliest of all." But by 2003 the federal funding for the flood control project essentially dried up as it was drained into the Iraq war. http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/MainPages/News.asp?Type=TRUE&ID=521&Language=English [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 7, 2005]

Note: http://www.canadianacti...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:18 pm
    Now if Steve Watson can only tell me who is behind this, is it the citizens of the USA , is it the Bush family or is it the Republican Party?

    Surely it is not the people, they would never do this to themselves, sure the Bush family are powerful but they are not that powerful, so I would say that these are the action of the Republican Party, wouldn't you agree?

    ---
    Good government is not a party government

  2. Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:01 pm
    No, Wayne, the 3 centuries of corrupt New Orleans politics (their "own way of doing things") has more to do with the outcome than anything else.

  3. by gorian
    Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:42 pm
    Praying won't help you.
    Crying won't do you no good.

    G

  4. by Spanky
    Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:03 am
    I posted these links on another thread that's now sunk off the front page, so for those who didn't see it:<br><br> <b>The Mississippi Gambler</b> by Mike Rivero.<br><br> SNIP<br><br> George Bush is a gambler. But unlike the Vegas tourist, Bush is gambling with property that is not his. Bush bet the entire City of New Orleans on his war in Iraq. And because the city of New Orleans is the gateway to the Mississippi River and the central states, Bush was gambling with the entire river system and the economy of the great plains.<br><br> You see, Bush has this little war going on. Nobody really knows what the purpose of this war is, but Bush bet that he could swindle the American people into the war with a few lies. and for a time, he won that bet. But like the gambling addict Bush kept playing the same game over and over until his luck ran out and he hit Gambler's ruin. Now the entire world knows Bush lied to start that war.<br><br> In order to pay for that war in Iraq, while at the same time giving huge tax cuts to wealthy supporters, Bush started slashing the budgets on domestic programs to free up cash. Many of those programs were Louisiana Flood Control and Hurricane preparedness projects. In one notable case, funding was cut for repair of a levee while the levee was in a weakened condition; the dirt piled up not compacted, not planted to stabilize it, and without the required erosion proof lining. Not only money, but supplies such as sandbags were sent off to Bush's war, along with most of the Louisiana National Guard. Bush gambled that the levees would hold up while he spent the money on his war. He lost that bet, and lost New Orleans, and commerce on the Mississippi for weeks to come.<br><br> Bush is the 21st Century Mississippi gambler, gambling on a scale George Devol could never have dreamed of. Bush bet the actual Mississippi River. And lost.<br><br> So here is the real question to ask. It is highly unlikely that chance would bring the hurricane to bear on the one place where Bush had left the domestic infrastructure gutted. More than likely, Bush has been betting with domestic programs all across the nation, betting that they won't be needed while he siphons off funding to feed his war.<br><br> More at: <a href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/missgambler.html">The Mississippi Gambler</a><br><br> And we all know how the Republicans abhor government handouts, except, apparently, when it's government handouts like cushy government jobs which go to their own well-connected but incompetent Republican cronies and hangers on.<br><br> Following snip from the NY Daily News:<br><br> WASHINGTON - The three top jobs at the Federal Emergency Management Agency under President Bush went to political cronies with no apparent experience coping with catastrophes, the Daily News has learned.<br><br> Even if Bush were to fire embattled and suddenly invisible FEMA Director Michael Brown over his handling of Hurricane Katrina, the bureaucrat immediately below him is no disaster professional, either.<br><br> While Brown ran horse shows in his last private-sector job, FEMA's No. 2 man, deputy director and chief of staff Patrick Rhode, was an advance man for the Bush-Cheney campaign and White House. He also did short stints at the Commerce Department and Small Business Administration.<br><br> Rhode's biography posted on FEMA's Web site doesn't indicate he has any real experience in emergency response.<br><br> In addition, the agency's former third-ranking official, deputy chief of staff Scott Morris, was a PR expert who worked for Maverick Media, the Texas outfit that produced TV and radio spots for the Bush-Cheney campaign. In June, Morris moved to Florida to become FEMA's long-term recovery director.<br><br> More at: <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/story/344004p-293718c.html">FEMA packed with W's pals</a><br><br> Dubya knows well enough where his loyalty lies. Making sure his pals have cushy government jobs and perks takes precedence over making sure that FEMA has competent leadership to handle disasters and save the lives of US citizens. Yeah "Brownie" you are doing a fine job there. Dubya says so, and he would know right? <br><br>

  5. Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:25 am
    Complete incompence by the municipal Mayor, and state Governor, compounded by the traditional "cajun" corrupt politics...<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007219">http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007219</a><br />
    <br />
    "...Mayor Nagin was responsible for giving the order for mandatory evacuation and supervising the actual evacuation: His Office of Emergency Preparedness (not the federal government) must coordinate with the state on elements of evacuation and assist in directing the transportation of evacuees to staging areas. Mayor Nagin had to be encouraged by the governor to contact the National Hurricane Center before he finally, belatedly, issued the order for mandatory evacuation. And sadly, it apparently took a personal call from the president to urge the governor to order the mandatory evacuation..."<br />
    <br />
    "...The federal government does not have the authority to intervene in a state emergency without the request of a governor. President Bush declared an emergency prior to Katrina hitting New Orleans, so the only action needed for federal assistance was for Gov. Blanco to request the specific type of assistance she needed. She failed to send a timely request for specific aid..."<br />
    <br />
    So Mayor Nagin screwed up, while Gov. Blanco dithered and wept. As canadians, surely you can empathise with that.<br />

  6. Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:45 am
    The story of New Orleans is nothing more, or less, than the description of the workings of neoclassical market economy, taught at universities all around the world as a "science". Because of this monumental fraud, that has now become the biggest cime wave in history, the tragedy of New Orleans could have and can happen just about anywhere on Ear and the USA. The BC government is also "business friendly, tax and cost cutter to invite wealth creating foreign investment", without a clue of the workings of nature and history.

    As long, and until society remains unwilling to come to grip with this simple fact, tragedies like this will keep on happening all over, not to mention that 25 million will die this year from the effects of starvation globally, without any fanfare, while their governments and economists report rising GDP figures.

    Our American friends can wipe the chip of their shoulders, because this is not just an American sickness, but a worldwide tragedy happening and waiting to happen, as long as we put up with these idiots in our goverments and universities. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  7. Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:40 pm
    They "story" is a little more complicated methinks.

  8. Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:20 pm
    Yes, the story is more complicated, but all buildings are started and resting on simple concrete block foundations. The foundation of the growing, worldwide tragedy of hunger, destitution and environmental destruction is on the theory of neoclassical economics.
    ===============================================================
    Even there, on the simple, one line, fraudulent definition of economic efficiency.
    ==============================================================
    I would like to remind you, for example, that for hundreds of years, the white people of the world, especially of the New World, have been kidnapping and enslaving millions of Africans based on one line in the Bible, with God empowering the children of Noah to enslave the children of one of their own brothers, who was turned black, because he dared to look at his old man's balls when he was lying there drunk.

    How about the destruction of Troy after a 10 year siege and for what? History is full of such examples when single words, or sentences, caused mass destruction and murder of whole countries and empires.

    One day, when our society wakes up from their drunken dreams, they may just realize that profits gained with the lowest monetary inputs do not represent "efficiency", but societal suicide. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  9. Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:11 pm
    Not all buildings rest on cinder block. My home rests on rough dressed fieldstone held together by clay/lime/sand mortar although there are other structural stone elements to the foundation. Be that as it may, what you see in New Orleans (and the region - it's not just the city that was hit hard) is the product of a great number of things. Reductionist logic can be very dangerous to the ultimate user's ability to understand something for what it is. If you want easy answers that satisfy then be my guest but you'd do well not assume it's the primary, let alone only truth. You know better sir.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news