Venezuela Launches 12 New State Enterprises To Substitute Imports

Posted on Monday, February 27 at 15:44 by N Say
The creation of Coniba, “forms part of the sowing of the oil and of the policy of endogenous development,” of the Chavez government, said Alvarez during the company’s inauguration. Endogenous development is the term the Chavez government has used to describe the project of developing the country’s economy “from within,” that is, without relying primarily on outside investors. The plan to “sow the oil,” an expression borrowed from Venezuela’s oil boom years in the 1970’s, is a plan to use the country’s oil wealth for investment in and diversification of the country’s economy. http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/print.php?newsno=1883 [This is the OPPOSITE of what Canada has been doing since the National Policy days. What Canada did & has been doing is called "import-substitution industrialization" in other words, a branch-plant, resource-exporting economy, & it was even the intention of the National Policy to do that. They also say that it's the quick & easy route to industrialization. This is why some writers call Canada the world's richest 3rd-world country. -- NSay]

Note: http://www.venezuelanal...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Deacon
    Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:34 am
    Now that's what Canada should be doing, and I've been saying it for years.

    Too bad our politicians are too damn beholden to foreign special interests to even consider pursuing it.

  2. Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:57 am
    Chevaz is becoming my paragon. Bush and Martin were twins causing the demoralization of their countries whereas Chavaz is attempting to prove Americanization is not healthy. The future of Venezuela depends on an upward struggle to overcome North American interference. Harper has already indicated he disagrees. Somewhere down the road, Canada will be begging for "freetrade" with that country. Hopefully Chevaz will at that time teach Canadas PM how to get his own country to stand on her own feet. To bad he can't now!

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  3. Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:16 am
    It is my sincere hope that the readers of Vive find the kind of info that tells them ‘no more mainstream parties’

    ---
    People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
    Alexei Sayle

  4. Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:56 am
    That sounds like a very good idea. When a country is more self-reliant, they will be affected less by the world economy's ups and downs. Where would we be if the USA's economy went down the tubes?

    The problem is, that the USA going down the tubes is inevitable. I would like to see some action on this by our government. Alberta can't carry the whole country with it's oil revenues.

  5. Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:09 pm
    Indeed Venezuela is embarked on a course directly opposed to the neo-cons
    and capitalistic globalization. In addition to their many progessive programs
    on literacy, medical care, housing, free post-secondary education, paying
    women who work as householders, 'supermarkets' that provide food stuffs at
    at or near wholesale costs - essentially using their oil revenues to benefit the
    many and not just the elite, as well as an incredible constitution - a people's
    constitution - which is being implemented, and Telesur TV to take on the
    media-monopolies, etc etc...it is good to see they are thinking about nation
    building....which we are not doing in Canada. Indeed, as a development
    economist & lawyer, ---one prescription for nation building is 'close the
    leakage of jobs, capital, technology,etc", do import substitution and build as
    many forward and backward 'linkages' in the economy. Indeed Venezuela is
    using the oil revenues to produce 'public goods'...while we, allow our oil &
    gas sectors to be completely controlled by foreign multinationals. I always
    thought that when a nation loses a war - spoils go to the victor - spoils
    might be such treasure as gold, oil, gas, forests, clean water, agricultural
    goods, etc.....but here - Canada has fought no war - yet, as a consequence of
    'quiet treason' we have basically lost the nation---and the 'spoils', indeed
    the riches of this nation have gone to the victors. What remains, will surely be
    sold by Harpo and his gang of continentalists - at firesale side prices and in
    a wink - should they ever get a majority--not one doubt of that in my mind.
    ..and leading the way will be that new Cabinent Minister from you know
    where. That is what happens when Capital gets a hold of the levers of
    government...and joe & jane public citizen...keep voting the mainstream
    parties in. I would be happy to hear what 'hope' there is to counteract these
    ideological currents in Canada, what hope there is to awake a slumbering
    citizenry - beguiled by hockey, internet, hollywoood entertainment, drugs,
    alcohol, --and all the distractions & 'fun' of the modern consumer society -
    that is the Canadian oppression - this "beguilement', this 'apathy', this
    'hesitation', this 'fear', 'this individuality and lack of solidarity', --what will
    come under Harpo or the Liberals for that matter - will no doubt be a
    pedagogy for the oppressed - maybe then we will have 'our Venezuela' wake-
    up call.

  6. by N Say
    Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:30 pm
    here's some info on import-substitution industrialization:<br />
    "Import substitution industrialization also called ISI is a trade and economic policy based on the premise that a developing country should attempt to substitute products which it imports, mostly finished goods, with locally produced substitutes. The theory is similar to that of mercantilism in that it promotes high exports and minimal imports to increase national wealth.<br />
    <br />
    The policy has three major tenets: <br />
    -- an active industrial policy to subsidize and orchestrate production of strategic substitutes, <br />
    -- protective barriers to trade (namely, tariffs), <br />
    -- and a monetary policy that keeps the domestic currency overvalued. Hence import substitution policies are not favored by advocates of absolute free trade."<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Import_substitution_industrialization">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Import_substitution_industrialization</a><br />
    Canada, with it's fairly big trade surplus obviously has high exports & low imports. Our governments also actively encourage development of branch plants as in the 1st part of the definition. Canada also had a high tariff back in the JA MacDonald days to encourage US branch plants to set up here. I'm not sure if our dollar has been overvalued esp since it was only US$0.63 at one point but as below, that's what countries do when they're designed to export. That last bit is interesting though. I wonder what Harper, etc think of ISI then. <br />
    <br />
    & here's info on export-oriented industrialization, which also describes Canada's situation perfectly I think:<br />
    "Export-oriented Industrialization is a trade and economic policy aiming to speed-up the industrialization process of a country through exporting goods for which the nation has a comparative advantage. Export-led growth implies opening domestic markets to foreign competition in exchange for market access in other countries. Reduced tariff barriers, floating exchange rate (devaluation of national currency is often employed to facilitate exports), and government support for exporting sectors are all an example of policies adopted to promote EOI, and ultimately economic development. Export-oriented Industrialisation was particularly characteristic of the development of the national economies of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore in the post World War 2 period. The purpose of international institutions such as the World Trade Organization, work in favour of such trade strategies and promote multilateral trade policy rules to put every nation on the same playing field."<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export-oriented_industrialization">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export-oriented_industrialization</a><p>---<br>"George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  7. by avatar Jacob
    Tue Feb 28, 2006 11:02 pm
    I agree with this. Countries protect their sovereignty by pursuing this kind of policy. South Africa did this quite successfully for many years, and also Rhodesia during the UDI years. Canada should do this also. Buy stuff that is locally made.

    With no shirt factory in the US, even Buch and Cheney wear shirts made in Bangladesh, Honduras, Macao or (you name it).

    I think this type of manufacturing diversification could be called "reverse outsourcing" or "insourcing".

  8. by avatar Darna
    Tue Feb 28, 2006 11:54 pm
    "I would be happy to hear what 'hope' there is to counteract these ideological currents in Canada, what hope there is to awake a slumbering citizenry - beguiled by hockey, internet, hollywoood entertainment, drugs, alcohol, --and all the distractions & 'fun' of the modern consumer society - "

    Yes, we appear to be going down the same path as the US started on some decades ago, and look where they've ended up. How long will it be before we have tv shows like 'Cops - Toronto' or 'Cops - Vancouver'. There is a scary trend flowing in, and for the most part, we're drugged on our couches.

    ---
    "It's a heck of a place to bring your family." —George W. Bush, on New Orleans, La., Jan. 12, 2006

  9. Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:04 am
    The WTO is basically a criminal organization, set up to destroy the democrating decision making powers of societies in favour of corporate profits, through the enforcement of the neoclassical, market economy theory .

    The theory is based on fraudulent quotations from the classical "greats", like Adam Smith and David Ricardo. Ricardo's theory of "comparative advantage" doesn't include the free free movement of capital, especially of imaginary fiat capital which didn't exist in his age, and destroys the benefit of any comparative advantage. E.g. Poverty in most oil, or tropical fruit producing countries.

    Economies built on exports and monetary competition, the main intentions of the neoclassical theory, are suicidal to any society, as all forms of competition demand constantly increased energy inputs, which are the real costs, and ultimately all competitive systems will burn out.

    Also, economies built for exports and competition demand increased specialization, which causes and creates incompetence. This is the real purpose of the theory, because incompetent and forcibly urbanized societies have to rely on bought foods, products and services for every minute of their lives, which enriches the controllers of the economy and raises the phoney GDP.

    Ed Deak.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news