“They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges."
"This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call 'Social Insurance.' Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
And there isn't a court in America the conspiracy would be tried.
Quote is from:
http://www.naturalperson.com/New%20Website/5%20Advance/Advance%202%20Final.htm
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 29, 2007]
Note: http://www.naturalperso...
Evidence Of Rock Solid Conspiracy
Posted on Saturday, January 27 at 13:34 by DiogenesContributed By
Article Rating
(0 votes)
Options
Stumble It!Comments
view comments in forum
Page 1 2
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesday_Book">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesday_Book</a><br />
"...and there was no appeal."<p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
-Max Planck<br />
<br />
<br />
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
<br />
lex ferenda
-Max Planck<br />
<br />
---
[juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights"
lex ferenda
<a href="http://www.answers.com/writ">http://www.answers.com/writ</a><p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
-Max Planck<br />
<br />
see the Criminal Government in B.C. thread
---
[juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights"
lex ferenda
<a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/literalist">http://www.answers.com/topic/literalist</a><p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
-Max Planck<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/literalist">http://www.answers.com/topic/literalist</a> <br />
<br />
Thank you recognizing the obvious. I can be classified as a literalist as it is one of my many attributes. As of late I have been contributing with ‘da rulz’: law. And my friend law is literate, and is only one facet of my being. <br />
<br />
What ever goodness you have, or had, has been spent from the moment you chose to lay false claim with regard to redemption. No one with a knowledge of words, their definitions , how those definitions have been tampered with, as so as to create meaning(s) other than there original intent could make a claim built on falsity and expect retorts other than those you received. Blackstone’s Commentaries, Maxims of Law, and again I must remind you; all literal, and we all live under law, do we not?<br />
As well all live under Bar-recognize words, that is, words used with correct knowledge of their meaning, those words and the acumen to form intelligible sentences, is language of the Court.<br />
Are you all familiar with the English phrase, ‘literal misprint’?<br />
To have goodness with me …You will have to invest more than you’ve offered thus far. <br />
Your goodness is spent, and you are overdrawn at the Karma Bank.<br />
You have no idea of my experiences, therefore your judgments are unfounded and of course, false.<br />
Having read the puny two sentence entry re: ‘literalist’ as a representation of your ignorance, I can only offer you sympathy… which as I’m sure you know, comes between shit and syphilis, in better dictionaries.<br />
Yup Cheap shot! But cheap shots are what started it all weren’t it? There being no redemption and all?<br />
There is under the law and in this world that is where it counts. ”Da Rulz”<br />
<br />
Redemption:<br />
c.1340, "deliverance from sin," from L. redemptionem (nom. redemptio) "a buying back, releasing, ransoming," from redemptus, pp. of redimere "to redeem, buy back," from re- "back" + emere "to take, buy, gain, procure" (see exempt). The -d- is from the Old L. habit of using red- as the form of re- before vowels, and this is practically the sole Eng. word in which it survives. Redemptorist is from Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer (founded Naples, 1732, by St. Alphonsus Liguori). In the Mercian hymns, L. redemptionem is glossed by O.E. alesnisse.<br />
We are all under law and law is explicitly literal. <br />
Literal b, Hence, applied to taking words in there etymological or primary sence, or in the sense expressed by the actual wording of a passage, without recourse to any metaphorical or suggested meaning-1597.<br />
The test of time proves the definition. And that has been lost – and we are the worse for it!<br />
<br />
From the same root etymology comes “Literato”: one of the literati; a man of letters; a learned man.<br />
Your ad homenim attacks from ignorance will be met with the level from which they originate.<br />
Deal with it as a man and not some quasi historian and we’ll get along fine … or not. Your call.<br />
<p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
<br />
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
<br />
lex ferenda
A literalist will never see trees as part of a living ecosystem. The concept of Gaia will forever elude a literalist.
A literalist will never enjoy language with all it's foibles, subtleties, double entrendres, that are the essence of a vibrant and vigorous civilization.
Pity.......
---
"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."
-Max Planck
<br />
Buffoons like your self who spring their own traps on them selves are the one more deserving of pity than I,<br />
<br />
could it be you were too close to your floor layers contact cement?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera&rls=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=+Floor+layers+syndrome&spell=1">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera&rls=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=+Floor+layers+syndrome&spell=1</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0907/is_4_58/ai_111732608/pg_3">http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0907/is_4_58/ai_111732608/pg_3</a><p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
<br />
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
<br />
lex ferenda
---
"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."
-Max Planck
and to what end?
For someone who falsely, as the evidence now shows, makes convoluted assertions of is and is not or does and does not has now shown they are not, nor are likely to be anytime soon, qualified to address the topic of this thread, but instead Mad Hatter like goes off on chemical flights of fantasy pretending to be cognisant, you have much to learn.
What “Colonel” House set forth has come to pass, my friend, is the issue, not how you perceive what I’ve presented or even how you perceive what you assume of the personae I place before the readership.
You are another who has been weighed, measured, and found to be wanting, and so what have you done, other than entered into ad homenim attacks?
You are dismissed!
---
[juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights"
lex ferenda
<br />
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/RoadShow1.html">http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/RoadShow1.html</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
The information that follows provides the history of a Roadshow of Deception. The Roadshow of Deception was used to demonstrate psychological warfare techniques and strategies to different Whitehouse Administrations. The Roadshow of Deception was used to convince different presidential administrations to use psychological warfare techniques on American citizens.<br />
…<br />
(and now with the NAU in the wings, Canada and Mexico as well)<br />
<br />
The Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs were formally founded in 1919. The Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International Affairs continue to effectively coordinate psychological operations used to manipulate the American public and people in other nations. The Council On Foreign Relations headquarters is the Pratt House, 58 E. 68th Street, NY, NY, 10021. England's Royal Institute of International Affairs headquarters is Chatham House, 10 St. James' Square, London, SW1Y 4LE, UK. The Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs have branch organizations in other nations including Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, Australia, India, France, China, Japan, Netherlands, and the Soviet Union.1<br />
<br />
Tthe rest at the above addy)<br />
<p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
<br />
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
<br />
lex ferenda
I believe t'was you who began this charade by questioning the use of "writ", thereby leaving yourself open to "investigation"............
But, you having learned you cannot win, the literist mind being somewhat truncated, choose to scurry off.
BTW, the "conspiracy" you reveal was in the works long before Woodrow's time. It embodied itself somewhat earlier in The Federalist Papers........
---
"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."
-Max Planck