Musings On The B.C. Election

Posted on Friday, May 13 at 17:47 by Arthur

The first question, therefore, with respect to the concept of responsibility, ought to be: if this government is being responsible, to whom is it being responsible?

The answer, judging from a devastating four-year assault on social programs and services, increased fees and an unwillingness to protect the province’s resources and environment, is that Gordon Campbell’s Liberals have shamelessly and arrogantly displayed to the people of British Columbia their unflagging allegiance to large corporations rather than to the citizens of this province. As a result they have betrayed that initial prerequisite of trust and responsibility which Godwin recommended as government’s sine qua non for existing.

Now I am sure that the Liberals would argue that creating a strong business climate is the sure method for increasing prosperity; and that is an argument which, on the surface, doesn’t require a response. What does need to be questioned, though, is the manner in which government goes about improving the economy, and at what personal expense to the citizens it undertakes such a task.

My feelings on the matter, based upon the research I’ve done with respect to the movement by large corporations worldwide to institute a controlled global economy, suggest that the Liberals have chosen to follow a prescription already laid out in advance by other nations, notably the USA and Great Britain. It’s one that involves pursuing an aggressive agenda of cuts to universal social (human) services and programs and also one that doggedly undermines the ability of local, regional, provincial and federal governments to determine what may be right and beneficial for their constituents. In other words, it is an alien system; and it’s being forced upon an unwitting public via subterfuge and the collusion of special corporate and financial interests working through a supposed representational, democratic government and aided by a compliant, corporate media.

What the B.C. Liberal government has had to sacrifice upon the corporate altar to thus ensure its insidious agenda comes to fruition is nothing less than its moral conscience. That is why the majority of British Columbia’s citizens now view Campbell’s “Wizard of Oz” Liberals as a Tinman government ruled by a Tinpot, autocratic leader without a heart. It’s an administration acting more as a corporate arm with a hatchet attached than an entity of sensibility and reason capable of offering needful hope and assistance to the elderly, sick, disabled, unemployed, homeless, downtrodden and poor; incapable of offering courage and direction to those many who struggle on a daily basis to sustain a measure of human dignity and respect.

Again, referring to Godwin’s principle that gaining "the confidence of the people" is the only basis of a good administration, we see that Campbell’s Liberals understand but one thing when it comes to such measures: make money, money, money, as if money per se were the end-all and be-all of a province’s existence. By rushing headlong into adopting this bastard-child of Reaganomics, which is really only a one-sided method of economic growth beneficial to large corporations and banking interests, the Liberals have essentially segregated themselves and their corporate shareholders from the bulk of the common working people of the province. And while it is no secret that a tiny rivulet of wealth does trickle down through the cracks in the corporate container, the lion’s share of financial benefit and the accompanying ability to use it for the greater social good, escapes from the public coffers into the pockets of greed-driven investors.

Money therefore has become the top-, center- and bottom-line focus of the Liberal government – money for corporations, that is, at all cost to the taxpayers and the environment. And as we look at the main planks of the Liberal platform (and their advertisements for re-election) and see a consistent adherence to this corporate philosophy, deep down inside we realize just how much this ruse has lost its luster for those British Columbians who have watched their level of comfort and security diminish over the past four years while chartered banks and corporations continue to report obscene, record profits.

So where, in this grey, gloomy climate, do these principles of responsibility and inspired confidence that Godwin wrote about ultimately shine through? Alas, only for the corporate sector and the wealthy do we see the clear light breaking forth. As for the bulk of B.C.’s population, life grows increasingly darker; and the future grows bleaker, as purchasing power shrinks and financial suffering plagues greater numbers.

The big question is: will the election change this scenario or will voters once again be duped into believing the “new” list of promises that the Campbell Liberals are proposing to replace the last ones which they didn’t follow through on? If we truly want to have a responsible government here in B.C., one that we can feel confident has the best interests of all British Columbians at heart, then we’re going to have to remove our rose-coloured glasses and take a hard, discerning look at the cold, calculating corporate realities which we’ll have to face should the Liberals once again fool the people.

[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on May 15, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat May 14, 2005 3:04 am
    An excellent summation of events. May I add that the BC Liberals have been staying with a single theme - the economy. They want to take credit for a number of things. First and foremost let us remember that historic low interest rates and near record highs for commodity prices are what is driving this province, not anything they have done. As we see interest rates start to rise again, expect the BC economy to slow rapidly.

    As well, when one looks at GDP it has remained constant for pretty much the last 12 years. So have they done such a wonderful job? I think not, and many BCers are not fooled.

    **bias alert** sadly many are again going to vote for the NDP and bless their little souls, they mean well, but they are inept and have a way of screwing things up. Fast ferries et al. They are ready to vote NDP for the same reasons we saw during the federal election - vote blocking. Many want to vote DRBC or Green, but don't want a Liberal to win so they go with the devil they know. Many of these same voters voted Liberal last time to get rid of the NDP. It is high time for STV to be passed so people can vote as they want, and so we may see a government more reflective of peoples true wishes instead of who they don't want.

    Roy Whyte
    Green Party Candidate Surrey-Whalley

  2. by gina
    Sat May 14, 2005 6:10 pm
    As a person who wants to see electoral reform I am very concerned about the size of the ridings and how difficult this is going to make fundraising for potential candidates, and who will ultimately have the advantage under the proposed STV system. This system may be great for small countries like Malta, and Northern Ireland with a small land mass but BC ridings are already huge and as a volunteer for a political party the idea of having to go out even farther to learn the issues and meet the people is even more daunting under STV. This is not a small problem and I think it is being glossed over. I would prefer smaller ridings and a couple of more seats in the legislature such as might be had under MMP which is the system used in Norway and which has the highest representation by women at 39%. A system where women are having that rate of success indicates that proportionality is highly evident. This system was not even looked at by the Assembly. The NDP is committed to electoral reform and I disagree that this is the only chance we will have to change the electoral system. I am opposed to having votes counted by a computer as this may lead to rigging such as is found in the USA. I say wait for more choices to be offered and not jump at STV.

    ---
    gina

  3. by RPW
    Sat May 14, 2005 8:48 pm
    This "condensation" of ridings only serves to weaken the rural areas, to the advantage of urban ridings. But that is what the present riding system does anyway. Coupled with political catering to the larger population base, it all serves to create economic pressures, forcing people to move to "the big city" (aka Vancouver) to find work. We need to put something in place that encourages just the opposite -- like tax credits for NOT living in urban areas, or requiring immigrants to spend a number of years NOT in Vancouver, or requiring university and college graduates who rely on PUBLIC MONIES for their education to spend a number of years NOT in Vancouver. The list goes on......

    ---
    RickW

  4. by RPW
    Sat May 14, 2005 8:57 pm
    <a href="http://thetyee.ca/Views/2005/05/05/LibsBigFib/">http://thetyee.ca/Views/2005/05/05/LibsBigFib/</a><br />
    "How do you create a fiscal crisis? Simple. Take over $2 billion dollars of government revenue and burn it - or, even better, give it away in tax cuts to your friends. BC's largest corporations got a huge whack of tax cuts and so did BC's wealthiest residents.<br />
    <br />
    Campbell's cuts were some of the most unfair ever seen in Canada with the wealthiest 11,000 British Columbians (those making over $250,000) taking home 15.2 percent of the total tax cut pie, about as much as the million people who make up bottom half of all tax payers earning $30,000 or less."<p>---<br>RickW

  5. Sun May 15, 2005 4:42 am
    STV is not perfect - I will be the first one to admit that, but it is FAR superior to the FPP.

    As for your suggestion of larger ridings - yes they will get larger but the candidate to get elected need only focus on a small part of it. As for them being too large - yes in the rural areas but in the burbs they are not that big now all things considered.

    If STV is allowed to fail the Liberals who will form the next BC government will seize upon that as a reason to shut down further debate on reform. They will claim it was the will of the people. Who does that help? Whereas if STV passes it can be worked upon to improve it.

    Roy



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news