Harper Kids Off To Vimy Celebration

Posted on Saturday, March 31 at 14:48 by Rural
Officials with the Prime Minister's Office would not comment on whether Liberal, NDP or Bloc Québécois leaders had been invited. But spokespersons for Liberal Stéphane Dion and New Democrat Jack Layton confirmed yesterday they had not been invited. Yesterday, Liberal officials accused Harper of breaking with "parliamentary tradition" by refusing to ask opposition politicians to come along. Layton was hoping to take part but "Mr. Harper hasn't been in the habit of inviting the other leaders to these sorts of events ... and that is quite unfortunate," said Karl Belanger, his spokesperson. The tradition is hit and miss. It took a public relations debacle to convince former prime minister Paul Martin to attend VE-Day celebrations in Holland in 2005 – and have the three opposition leaders tag along. Martin had cancelled his plans for the trip, citing fears the opposition might topple his minority government. He changed course and invited the three rival leaders after public accusations that political leaders were ignoring Canada's veterans. Earlier, in 2004, Liberals say Martin invited Harper and Layton to France to mark the 60th anniversary of the D-Day invasion – during a federal election – but both stayed in Ottawa Before that, prime minister Jean Chrétien took opposition leaders to New York after the terror attacks in 2001. Senator Norm Atkins's father fought at Vimy, making him one of the few federal politicians with a direct tie to the famed battle. Even he wasn't invited. "It was something I would have thought that Veterans Affairs or the government would have given special attention to," Atkins said. He will make the trip after arrangements were made for him to attend on behalf of a Senate committee. http://www.thestar.com/News/article/198073 Seems that he has decided that it didn’t look good and so has now “invited” representatives from the opposition. See……… http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=75920b71-714f-40bd-97e8-9a3c6952004e&k=29102 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 2, 2007]

Note: http://www.thestar.com/... http://www.canada.com/t...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 am
    Question for me is; why do they have to wait for an invitation? Is this not a
    commemoration ceremony? Do they need his permission to go? Or is it a
    matter of money? If they are invited guests of the PM he pays, if they go on
    their own they pay? I would think that if it is important to them they would
    just declare they are going out of respect and if someone offers to pay then
    bonus.

    Far too much attention is paid to who has the power to say who does what,
    common sense should be dusted off in this country at all levels. As for the
    kiddies, well what else do you do on spring/Easter Break when you're the PM's
    kids? Perhaps they will get a glimpse of what happens when some men decide
    for others that war is the only option? I think this is a red herring, he took the
    kids instead of the politicians, so what; maybe he prefers their company, you
    would hope that a father might, but it shouldn't preclude the others from
    going as well. They don't posture like buddies in the House or through the
    media so why be travelling buddies?

    ---
    "aaaah and the whisper of thousands of tiny voices became a mighty deafening roar and they called it 'freedom'!"' Canadians Acting Humanely at home & everywhere

  2. by Rural
    Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:53 pm
    You make a good point Catherine, there is nothing stopping the “others” from traveling separately and going without an invite from the PM. However given that Mr Harper will be flying over in his private jet at great expense to the tax payer would it not be better for the entire “Canadian Delegation” or at least those representing the electorate to be invited to join him both during travel and during the ceremonies. Other MPs who travel over by commercial carrier will be charging their travel expenses to the Canadian public and in this case I have no problem, if they have no other choice in order to get there, but a few less spin doctors and photographers on the PMs plane and there should be lots of room for a representative from each party. (Seems that room has in fact been found now?)



    ---
    When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp

  3. Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:08 pm
    Rural you also make good points. What I don't like about the slant on this
    article is that it assumes so much. A similar situation happened when there
    were ceremonies in Holland and Martin wasn't sure if he would go, then they
    argued about whether the rest could go etc. In the end they showed up a day
    late.

    Common sense should tell these guys to plan ahead. I'm sure they didn't just
    find out about the ceremony. They should have written to the PM and said we
    would like to go along, this would cost taxpayers less if we travelled together,
    are we invited? If we are not allowed to travel with you will we make our own
    arrangements. Then they can issue a press release so the public knows who is
    funding it and why. 'I believe this is an important event. Out of respect I will
    be attending. I asked to fly along with the PM to save the taxpayer some
    money on this but was refused by the PM"s office.' Or words to that affect.

    It irritates me that when Canadian politicians are going to
    represent us in another country they don' t seem to have the sense to do it in
    a classy manner. It shouldn't be an issue. I can see why it is though, when
    they fight like little children all year long we accept it; then we want them to
    put on their best clothes and dress up like adults for the world to see them as
    statesmen. It might be better if we expected statesmen at home conducting
    our business and then these events wouldn't look so immature and
    ridiculous.

    ---
    "aaaah and the whisper of thousands of tiny voices became a mighty deafening roar and they called it 'freedom'!"' Canadians Acting Humanely at home & everywhere

  4. by avatar Jacob
    Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:52 pm
    The honourable Senator is correct - this is a function of Veterans Affairs. Someone obviously goofed.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news