Democratic Debate Needed On Missile Defence!

Posted on Thursday, November 13 at 13:51 by sthompson
Without your voice Chrétien will let McCallum get away with quietly locking Canada into George W. Bush's missile defence program. They'll forge ahead knowing full well this military extravaganza will be more costly, more dangerous, and just as grotesquely unworkable as the original Ronald Reagan Star Wars scheme.

Don't be surprised. The decision is coming down the pike and will be made in secret. Why secret? Because the government knows that Canadians oppose missile defence.

But we can stop this crazy idea. Canadians are well aware that this U.S. military program endangers our security and will waste billions of dollars - money that needs to be allocated to social programs like health care, housing and alleviating poverty.

That's why I'm asking you to visit www.ceasefire.ca today. You can get more information and take action now.

Sadly, the decision to cuddle up to this military scheme will be made to appease global corporations and the American far right after having opposed their war on Iraq.

But even more worrisome, adopting missile defence is just one piece of an even larger agenda - deep integration between Canada and the United States. This idea is being championed by some of the same folks who brought us free trade and who now want Canada to adopt the U.S. dollar and further integrate our economies.

We need to let Prime Minister Chrétien and incoming Prime Minister Paul Martin know that we oppose missile defence.

We've already surrendered our sovereignty in areas such as energy, natural resources, social policy, and so-called harmonization of visa and immigration policy.

Now, Canada will give up even more sovereignty over our country's defence and security by handing decision-making powers to the Pentagon.

We ought to remember that George W. Bush said he considers Canada's water as part of his country's security policy. Thus "deep integration" should come as no surprise - the U.S. President and his Canadian free trade supporters seem to believe Canada is nothing more than a U.S. resource supplier. And it 's unlikely that Paul Martin will stand up for Canada.

Yet there is a growing wave of democratic power that Martin and Chrétien cannot ignore.

Canadians do not want further integration with U.S. social, political and military policies. We believe in our health care. We believe in peacekeeping and not wielding a big stick. We believe in our country. And we believe that we are much safer engaging with the rest of the world instead of forcing our will upon them.

I'm confident that Martin and Chrétien will change their minds when Canadians boldly speak up in favour of Canadian security and Canadian priorities.

Missile defence will be a disaster for Canada. It will undermine our sovereignty and security. It will likely force Canada to spend more money on the military, and on the wrong kind of military priorities at that (war-fighting instead of peacekeeping).

That's why I hope you'll join me and visit www.ceasefire.ca to send a letter to Prime Minister Chrétien and copy it to Paul Martin, letting them know that missile defence is unacceptable. And, at the very minimum, let them know they need to be brave enough to make the decision in public and not behind closed doors.

Sincerely yours,
Maude Barlow

Note: www.ceasefire.ca www.ceasefire.ca www.ceasefire.ca

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Nov 14, 2003 12:00 am
    Even if you agree with the Missle Defense plan, I would urge everyone to send this letter, if only to make the process open to Canadians. Worst case, they do it anyway, and we have to wait for an election.<p> We need to be consulted, too many decisions are made without consulting the Canadian People.<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  2. Sat Nov 15, 2003 12:36 am
    Yeah, that`s true. Those plutocrats have to be grounded and reminded that they should consult the people more often!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  3. Sat Nov 15, 2003 7:58 pm
    I wrote to ask for debate on this issue, and as expected I got the pat answer, don\'t worry you\'re pretty little head\' cause we\'re looking after you. No mention of the debate. I realize they are looking after someone, but I don\'t get any feeling of security for the Canadian people with this answer.

    REsponse in part from Mr.Lavell the executive correspondence officer for the PM:

    \'The Canadian
    government announced on May 30, 2003, that it was entering into talks
    with the government of the United States on Canada\'s possible
    participation in Ballistic Missile Defence. While the Government
    believes that missile defence has the potential to benefit Canada, it is
    nonetheless our responsibility to ensure that any arrangement protects
    Canada\'s national interests. Hence, this will be at the forefront of
    our discussions with US authorities. That said, no final decision will
    be taken by the Government prior to the completion of these discussions.
    Our assessment will take into account Canada\'s security interests for
    North America, our position on international arms control regimes, as
    well as our involvement in collective security as a member of NATO.\'

    When he says that, the \'government feels this would benefit Canada\' I guess he doesn\'t realize who the government is, as my letter quite plainly stated that I as a Canadian citizen, am against this endeavor! Feel secure? Not I!



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news