More Deceit. More Lies. More Cover-Up. The Gordon Campbell B.C. Government An

Posted on Tuesday, February 20 at 09:51 by Robin Mathews
Campbell went to Kitimat, remember, didn’t meet the Mayor or City Council. He ignored them. He announced a very large expansion of Alcan aluminum smelter capacity to come soon. That seems to be false, too. Alcan keeps saying that unless it gets the 1400% profit deal it may just freeze everything. Or go away. So Campbell’s announcement was fog, fakery, flunkeyism. What you see is what you get in this matter, unless you work for the Leonard Asper family at CanWest. What you have to see (if you’re normal) is Gordon Campbell acting in flagrant breach of the trust placed in him by the people of British Columbia. That is not, however, ever, what you hear or read or see from any of the CanWest lap-dogs in B.C., including the Vancouver Sun’s editorial writers. Questions have to be asked about them all. Are they hired because they register below the moron level in I.Q. tests? Are they so indoctrinated they can’t think? Are they so terrified of losing their jobs they’ll write anything? Or do they have a clear design? The answers don’t really matter. What matters is that British Columbians are misled, deceived, told half-truths, fed obviously false Gordon Campbell propaganda, indoctrinated with corporate bilge, and led away from seeing the primary breaches of the trust they have placed in the Gordon Campbell government. Do the flacks at CanWest really do all that? Try Vaughn Palmer, the man I call “Gordon Campbell’s personal representative at the Vancouver Sun “: Senior (ahem) Political Columnist there. What can he say when Campbell is caught red-handed? How can he cover for his (real) boss in such a situation? To begin, Vaughn Palmer doesn’t look at what is in front of his eyes. He refuses to admit Campbell led the dirty deal with Alcan after trying to keep it as a secret deal, kept from British Columbians. He won’t admit Campbell is doing a wrecking job on B.C, Hydro. He doesn’t tell his readers Campbell had a golden opportunity to serve the Province. Campbell could have set to work to build B .C. Hydro to be the grand energy servant of British Columbians: ecology-smart, progressive, assuring low-cast manufacture and housebold use, AS WELL AS quietly pouring billions into the Province’s general revenues to be used for education, health care, Kyoto concerns, and more. Palmer won’t tell his readers Campbell split B.C. Hydro into three parts, ruled it can’t generate more power but has to buy it from private sellers like Alcan! Palmer won’t tell his readers Campbell gave (in a secret contract) one-third of B.C. Hydro to Accenture, the dubious, off-shore, former dealer-with-Enron, to look after B.C. Hydro’s billing, metering, and financial affairs. Vaughn Palmer won’t tell his readers what you see - one third of B.C. Hydro in an all B.C.-owned distribution operation set up so British Columbians can’t control it, can’t get a decent profit from it, and must surrender to it all ability to sell energy wherever it wants (in the U.S. grid) for the profit of private owners Gordon Campbell has set up and is setting up. Do you wonder how Vaughn Palmer can show his face in public? Do you wonder how he can go on writing the pap he does for CanWest? The answer may be that Palmer thinks he’s on the winning team and when B.C. is destroyed, the friendly corporations will give him a private yacht to sail off the B.C. coast. He can call it “Lap-Dog” or “Fraser Institute” and equip it with a sound system that only transmits speeches by Gordon Campbell. Paradise! In the meantime, is Palmer following a carefully prepared design? Consider Vaughn Palmer’s column on the B.C. Utilities Commission ruling that stopped the dirty Alcan/Campbell/B.C. Hydro deal. Palmer reports on “the premier’s rationale” for the dirty deal. It would supply energy needs (?) at “a competitive price”. Pardon. 1400% profit to Alcan reflects a competitive price? Palmer has refused, ever, to say what the profit take would be for Alcan. Then, once again, Palmer pretends smelter expansion at Kitimat and the dirty deal were contained together in a pack. They aren’t. They never were. Then – to reveal the depths Palmer will sink to – he blames the failure of the deal on B.C. Hydro, which seems to have let Campbell down by telling the truth here and there. No, it said, B.C. Hydro doesn’t need Alcan. No, self-sufficiency isn’t involved in the dirty deal. (Indeed it is not. B.C. Hydro would be stunningly self-sufficient into the far future if it were put back together again, not privatized, allowed reasonable development, and given the chance to involve new ideas.) Hydro appears to have fallen into “mistakes” that made it look as if the deal might not have been so bad after all. But the mistakes were easy to spot and the B.C. Utilities Commission spotted them. How did the mistakes come to happen? Trust Vaughn Palmer. He asks questions. Did B.C. Hydro expect a Utilities Commission rubber stamp on the dirty deal? Was Hydro “going through the motions … not caring to be a conduit for a subsidy-in-all-but-name for the aluminum smelter”? Trust Vaughn Palmer. To avoid. Perhaps B.C. Hydro was tired of having its throat cut on behalf of Gordon Campbell’s corporate friends. Could it be the people at Hydro knew (as Palmer pretends he doesn’t) that the smelter “deal” was in no way tied to the 1400% profit deal on energy sales by Alcan to B.C. Hydro? So if Hydro supported the “heist” with a 1400% profit on it, there was no guarantee the smelter expansion would ever happen. The dirty deal would mean cozy, dirty profit for Campbell’s buddies, but less than nothing for B.C. Hydro, Kitimat, or the B.C. people. Gutless Vaughn Palmer refuses to finger Gordon Campbell for trying one of the dirtiest, smelliest deals in B.C. history. Instead, Palmer turns on the public servants in B.C. Hydro, already stretched on the rack by Campbell and his pirates. Palmer stands over the poor B.C. Hydro people with a lash. Bold, brave, courageous Vaughn Palmer. Is that bold posture by Palmer part of the design? Readers who suffered that Parade of Palmer Political Pornography shouldn’t be surprised that precisely six days later (Vanc. Sun, Feb 12, 07 A10) they were given another fog job, an editorial: “The Newspaper’s View”, titled “B.C. Hydro lets its customers down”. The Newspaper’s View we may take to be the view of Leonard Asper, the monopoly corporation’s CEO. (CanWest papers write “Right” – whether the truth or not - or the writers don’t last long.) The (faceless) editorial writers (like Vaughn Palmer) fell not on Gordon Campbell, but on B.C. Hydro. A coincidence? An accident? The editors admit they earlier got things wrong. They thought the deal was great; it turned out to be lousy. But did they really get it wrong or did they pretend it was okay, hoping the dirty deal would go through without being noticed? Didn’t they look into it - that important deal - those powerful, august managers of the Vancouver Sun? Didn’t they know that with Gordon Campbell’s knife in their backs, the B.C. Hydro representatives couldn’t tell the truth about the sham deal they were being pushed into? The Sun editorial writers don’t ask any embarrassing questions of Gordon Campbell. Like their fellow Lap-Dog, Vaughn Palmer, the editors go for the jugulars of B.C. Hydro representatives. Surprise? Not at all. Private corporate power in North American wants to destroy publicly owned B.C. Hydro. The Vancouver Sun editors (I say) are simply doing their job: misrepresenting the facts, covering-up for the dirty attempt of Gordon Campbell, working tirelessly to destroy B.C. Hydro. The editors even mislead on the “incentive” touted to get Alcan to expand smelter facilities at Kitimat. The editors call it “the $110 million incentive”. The “incentive” – with no binding demand that smelter facilities be built – was a two billion dollar, on-going sale of energy to B.C Hydro in a deal that would deliver 1400% profit to Alcan. If Vaughn Palmer’s Lap-Dog column stinks, the Sun editorial is a disgrace to the (already craven) level of argument for which the Sun is becoming infamous. But we can end, fortunately, with a humourous note (for those who like Black Humour). Apparently, concerned, caring, intelligent citizens have challenged the editors for the false, idiotic, mindless editorial: “BC Hydro lets its customers down”. (It should, to begin, have been entitled: “Gordon Campbell’s Dagger Found Between BC Hydro’s Shoulder Blades”.) Apparently, the editors were sympathetic to the complaints. If I’m not wrong, they suggested they may have taken the wrong tack. It has even been suggested the editorial was written all confused and in a rush. Will the editors write an apology and tell the real story? Will they do something? Of course not. Don’t be silly. After all, they work for the Asper family. After all, CanWest is a big, private, reactionary, monopoly corporation whose sympathies are with all the reactionaries in Canada (and the U.S.). B.C. Hydro must be completely destroyed, those reactionaries believe. “What”, the editors might ask, “do you think we’re paid to do? Do you think we’re paid to serve British Columbians? To tell the truth? To report fairly? We work for CanWest. Remember.” Funny eh. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 21, 2007]

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:56 pm
    Hello,<br />
    <br />
    The article by Robin Matthews from Feb. 20, 2007 entitled "More Deceit. More lies. More Cover-Up. The Gordon Campbell B.C. Government and CanWest Global" contains factual errors in regards to Accenture Inc.<br />
    <br />
    Accenture is not and has never been engaged in the practice of public accounting. Accenture has had no involvement in Arthur Andersen's audit services, including audit services to Enron. Accenture LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP had been separate legal entities and had operated independently since 1989. In 1990, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission formally recognized Accenture LLP as an entity separate and distinct from Arthur Andersen LLP. In 2000, all remaining historical contractual ties between Arthur Andersen and Accenture were completely severed.<br />
    <br />
    A correction to these factual errors is requested.<br />
    <br />
    Thanks,<br />
    Sarah Thompson<br />
    <br />
    Media and Analyst Relations Manager<br />
    Marketing and Communications<br />
    Accenture (Canada)<br />
    416-641-4416<br />
    sarah.thompson@accenture.com<br />
    AIM: sthompse<br />
    <br />
    To learn more about Accenture go to <a href="http://www.accenture.ca">www.accenture.ca</a>...<br />
    <br />
    <p>---<br>Don't want to be an American idiot / One nation controlled by the media / Information age of hysteria / It's calling out to idiot America.--Green Day<br />

  2. Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:45 pm
    "Sarah Thompson"

    Wow. What are the odds?

    In case anyone is confused, 'sthompson' (Susan Thompson) is not to be confused with the person who sent the letter, Sarah Thompson.


    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  3. Thu Feb 22, 2007 3:37 am
    With all due respect and without prejudice:


    I can’t help but hearing David Clayton Thomas, belting out “Spinning Wheel” as I read the words of Ms. Sarha Thompson, Media *and* Relations Manager, Marketing and Communications. Accenture.

    That all remaining historical contractual ties between Arthur Andersen and Accenture were completely severed have been emphasised and perhaps even over emphasised to the point of begging the question. “Why is the assertion so very important?”
    Historical contractual ties between Arthur Andersen and Accenture are a matter of record, and here is where it may get dicey, behind the scenes or out of the once and no more glare of MSM scrutiny, are possible to exist.

    We of the world are in times where due diligence vigils have become de rigueur as CBC’S radio documentary points out

    Due to the explicitness of language of contract law, “This” in deed may not be “That” and indeed, synchronisticaly defy one definition whilst obeying another.

    Toxic sludge is good for you!
    ROTFLMAO

    ,
    Yes Readers out there in Vaccuum Land ( a tip of the hat to Max Ferguson's and his radio show Rawhide) any further comments from Ms.Thompson are best suited to Vives Spin section


    ---
    [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]

    it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights"

    lex ferenda

  4. Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:54 pm
    Sarah,

    Funny you should find this article? Are you hired to google around for your reputation?

    Accenture was the consultant branch for Anderson, no?


    You tried to distance yourselves with your name differences the same way the Gordon Campbell government did from Social Cred because they were so sullied they had to cover up the fox uniform, sidestep their own shit and try to fool the sheep (which they did,and you did) to gain back power.

    You'll have to go ever deeper than this little website to clean yoursleves of the dirt.

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  5. by Wraun
    Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:25 pm
    "Funny eh"

    No, not at all. It is absolutely shameful that naturally born Canadians and British Columbians can be responsible for selling out and giving away our Country and in this case, Province and its resources to foreigners.

    ---
    Everybody got to deviate from the norm

  6. by RPW
    Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:51 pm
    <blockquote> Accenture is not and has never been engaged in the practice of public accounting. Accenture has had no involvement in Arthur Andersen's audit services, including audit services to Enron. Accenture LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP had been separate legal entities and had operated independently since 1989. In 1990, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission formally recognized Accenture LLP as an entity separate and distinct from Arthur Andersen LLP. In 2000, all remaining historical contractual ties between Arthur Andersen and Accenture were completely severed. </blockquote> Ah, the legal system....ain't it grand?! Similar arguements have been used time and again to get child molesters off as well. -- "Oh dear! You forgot to dot this 'i'! It means my client is not guilty (which in legalese is the same thing as innocent - though in life it more accurately translates as "got away with it")"--. <p>Ol' Gordo may have his shares in Alcan in a blind trust, and may not know what is happening to them, but if, as Premier he can favorably influence Alcan's bottom line, his shares will make him some serious coin..............</p> <p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
    -Max Planck<br />
    <br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news