Who knows if peacenik leaders like Duceppe and Layton will try to stop this, and we know the Conservative position on Canadian military independence, although they so support increased spending to serve U.S. interests.
Personally I've heard that hald of our CF-18s are already grounded or used for training, and Dr. Caleb mentioned one of our destroyers HMCS Huron (IIRC) was laid-up due to manpower shortages, but this is getting pretty transparent. Weaken Canada--and have an Orwellian gun registry to locate possible areas of resistance in an invasion, perhaps?
I know two high-school graduates personally, who both did preliminary training for at least 2 years, and were told at the end of it, that they passed with flying colours, but could not be taken on due to "Lack of available funds." Let's be thankful for the internet. At least now the Liberals can't pull a C.D. Howe without us finding out about it quite quickly...
Promise could gut military
Ships, jets may be scrapped to fulfill Liberal troop pledge
Chris Wattie; with files from Mike Blanchfield National Post, with files from CanWest News Service
Saturday, August 21, 2004
The Canadian military may be forced to mothball all of its remaining destroyers and ground up to a quarter of its front-line fighter jets in order to fulfill a Liberal election promise to create a new, 5,000-strong "peacekeeping brigade."
Bill Graham, the Defence Minister, is to present options on the proposed new brigade to Cabinet by the end of the month, but Defence sources have told the National Post the military has been told to prepare drastic measures to pay for the ideas.
In an article posted yesterday on the Web site of Jane's Defence Weekly, the London-based defence publishing and analysis group said senior Canadian officers have been working in secret on finding a way to pay for the promised influx of new troops.
Under the proposal, the navy is to take all of its Iroquois-class destroyers, the flagship vessels from which commodores or admirals can command a task force of warships, out of service, while the air force is to ground as many as 20 of its CF-18s, a quarter of its entire fighter force. The CF-18 Hornet is in the midst of a $2.3-billion, six-year modernization program.
During the federal election campaign, the Liberals promised to add a new brigade of 5,000 troops to the overstretched and chronically underfunded Canadian military specifically for peacekeeping and "peace support" missions.
The military was caught completely off guard by the pledge, which senior officers believe Paul Martin, the Prime Minister, made hastily in the heat of fighting an early Conservative surge in the campaign.
One senior military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Armed Forces are worried they "are going to be perceived as being in bed with this cockamamie idea."
They also fear the plan could lead to the effective demise of the navy and air force.
Just shows how much our sellout politicians truly practice careerist-poltiics. To read the rest:
http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=b393159c-5380-4b7d-91f3-8266b57ac1bf
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
Disband the military. Go ahead, who cares we don't need it. A 5000-man peace-keeping force sounds about right.. just in case some crazy militant anarchy group pops up in our own country, or for disasters, etc. Why not set the precident that you know what, even if we disagree strongly with you (another country) on an issue, we're not going to become involved in physical violence or intimidation to get what we want. We'll talk it out and try to find a middle ground. If we come from the perspective of compassion and tolerance, how can things go wrong?
Sure, you could agrue that maybe some crazy dictator on the other side of the World does not care if we choose peace instead of war, he'll shoot us anyway. But, I don't think this would happen. If we (the Primie Minister himself) address the PEOPLE (who are 99.9% of the time completely cut out of the discussion, and are fed dumb-downed and often complete bullshit through the media) in their country, as well as their administration.. with (fully documented and open) honesty, integrity and fairness (even if we stand to lose a little bit on some issues, less resources whatever it may be) would that not open up new avenues of cross-cultural acceptance? Why not conduct candid weekly interviews with figureheads (the Prime Minister, etc.) explaining for themselves what issues they were dealing with that week, and what steps they were taking to solve them? No prepared speeches, just a nationally televised chat over coffee. No secrets whatsoever. A complete open book policy for all to see. How else can we keep our "superiors" honest? Where did this idea of secrecy and paranoia come from anyway?
In Canada we don't stop anyway from freely practicing their religion or customs. Go for it, we don't mind. As long as it doesn't interfere with the freedom of others why should anyone mind? I'll tell you why, because World leaders aren't interested in tolerance and compassion, they're interested in control. They have no faith in the goodness of people, because they see and feel and act on the corruption in themsevles.
K, I forgot where I was going with this. Haha. I need to take a nap.
---
Revolution.
I personally liked the claim in the article that it takes many years to train soldiers and officers....you'd know more about this than I do of course, but I assume it wouldn't take 10 years to train a soldier or build a ship were it a priority. Say if NATO got us into another big war. It would happen almost instantly, wouldn't it?
I find it hilarious that we just built the fairly large Rexall Tennis Centre in Toronto to house the tennis masters tourney, in only 10 months, but these G-8 countries tell us it takes years to do something that could take weeks or months.
We need to decide WHAT kind of military we want and for what purpose.
A closer move to the US? No thanks - unless they drop that pre-emptive empire building bullshit.
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
Heh.
K I'm going to stop now before I get <i>really</i> riled up.
---
Revolution.
---
Dave Ruston
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
Think about it, we are all fed (food, not media images heh.. although I guess we are fed both). All of us. Sure we have to buy our food (which we shouldn't have to, but that's another matter), but it's there. None of us (even the homeless, as poorly treated as they are) ever starve. So, if you are not starting a war because you need food and are starving, then by what right do you start that war? ..because you need x resource over there to grow and expand technologically? Why not work in tandem with x country and include them in the process (if they say no, too bad. work harder to convince them of the good it would create for humanity, or think of another way to pull it off)? Oh that's right, greed. The fact that there's an economic component to it. Capitalism. The drive to place your country (with globalization its no longer about your country and totally about the individual/corporation), above another. The plight for power I suppose. But TECHNOLOGY exists now where we, at the very least, can see ITS infinite potential. Why not work towards freedom (from capitalism and the economic model first and foremost) instead of placing more shackles on it (socially and economically)? I think, as it's probably annoyingly clear (heh), that capitalism IS corruption and a very large (not all, but large) part of the problem. They go hand in hand. Only when we free ourself from the former can we even attempt to tackle the latter, and vice versa. We need to think our way out, but it's goddamn hard. I think disbanding the military is a (VERY) bold step in the right (? heh) direction, but then again change was never easy, right?
K. My mind just exploded. I gotta take a nap.
---
Revolution.
---
Dave Ruston
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill