Create An E-Annoyance, Go To Jail

Posted on Wednesday, January 11 at 10:03 by chall
This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison. "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else." A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language. "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy." http://news.com.com/Create%2Ban%2Be-annoyance%2C%2Bgo%2Bto%2Bjail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 11, 2006]

Note: http://news.com.com/Cre...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:14 pm
    It should be noted that Declan didnt stress that 'intent' is key to this legislation. If you annoy someone unintentionally, that's OK, but if you go out of your way to annoy them, you must give your real name. Otherwise, it's cyberstalking - 2 years maximum sentence. Hehehehe. You know who I'm talking to. (eh)



    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  2. Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:47 pm
    Well then, G.W. Bush should be put in jail for annoying everyone on the planet!

  3. Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:22 pm
    EVERYONE on this board is going to jail. I guess our defense could be: "One man's annoyance, is another man's opinion".

  4. Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:23 pm
    Oh no, not another thing to fear...lol. My cup runneth over.

    Sean..anon

  5. Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:44 pm
    That law says "without disclosing his identity". So how do you know its Bush?

  6. Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:45 pm
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."



    what a crock, another Stalinist 2 faced double standard, if this is the case , they should start with email spammers
    and hackers, not to mention the government who are spying on us through Echlon, Conivore, which costs the public
    billions each year

  7. by Bee
    Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:52 pm
    Another form of dictatorship . What is next ...everyone seems offended at the least little thing .

  8. Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:06 pm
    yup...gotcha on record as doin' such Cullebrity in yer own mind, and you've been around too...not just here :-D....believe you've already been told that though. :-D

    so matter how much your wipe off your servers it's too late. Gee. Did I mess up? But it's already in the hands of other who "care". Thoughtful of me to help you "oot" now wasn't I. Yup. (eh).

  9. Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:15 pm
    The new 'annoy' law explained<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://news.com.com/FAQ+The+new+annoy+law+explained/2100-1028_3-6025396.html">http://news.com.com/FAQ+The+new+annoy+law+explained/2100-1028_3-6025396.html</a>

  10. by mk
    Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:56 pm
    ... sticking up for the first amendment rights of the fine gents who have been handing me my scarlet letter over on another thread. But let me just say I sincerely hope Canada does not follow suit without serious amendment to the wording of this legislation (though I must admit it's nice to see Congress effectively ban the HTML <blink> tag once and for all).

    There are two types of communications on the Internet: push and pull. When I read a website, or choose to join a public (or for that matter private) web forum (pull), my right to be free from annoyance should not apply: though, technologies that prevent "egress" without running a gauntlet of annoyance might be a different case. On the other hand there are "push" technologies like email, text messaging, VOIP (and related P2P) where the intrusion upon one's own privacy or property cannot be easily controlled a priori or without unreasonable effort or expense. To these, existing laws need only be inclusive of the respective technologies.

    Thanks for the link, BTW. For all those who haven't read it, there is a link to the text of the actual legislation as well.

  11. Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:04 pm
    Actually, all these laws are being passed for future use. They will be used for a few select groups now, and then when they have completly brainwashed a whole generation, they will use these laws on every human being on earth.

  12. Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:14 pm
    Obviously the US government wants to make their job easier. Now they can not only listen to what you say or write but if you HAVE TO sign it, it will be so much easier on them... like: "I will nuke the Statue of Liberty on 4/07!" signed Osama B.L. ... yeah! much easier...

  13. Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:20 pm
    The first step towards taking control of the web...

    Does that annoy you president Bush? I guess that is too bad as I am Canadian, and don't fall under your rules.

  14. Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:32 pm
    If you think that borders are going to make you immune to any of this, then you better think again. The only way you MIGHT have a chance NOW, is if you throw away ALL your electronic devices AND all forms of electronic communication. Don't forget to hold all of your conversations in a wide open field.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news