This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.
"The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."
A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
http://news.com.com/Create%2Ban%2Be-annoyance%2C%2Bgo%2Bto%2Bjail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 11, 2006]
Note: http://news.com.com/Cre...

---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
Sean..anon
what a crock, another Stalinist 2 faced double standard, if this is the case , they should start with email spammers
and hackers, not to mention the government who are spying on us through Echlon, Conivore, which costs the public
billions each year
so matter how much your wipe off your servers it's too late. Gee. Did I mess up? But it's already in the hands of other who "care". Thoughtful of me to help you "oot" now wasn't I. Yup. (eh).
<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/FAQ+The+new+annoy+law+explained/2100-1028_3-6025396.html">http://news.com.com/FAQ+The+new+annoy+law+explained/2100-1028_3-6025396.html</a>
There are two types of communications on the Internet: push and pull. When I read a website, or choose to join a public (or for that matter private) web forum (pull), my right to be free from annoyance should not apply: though, technologies that prevent "egress" without running a gauntlet of annoyance might be a different case. On the other hand there are "push" technologies like email, text messaging, VOIP (and related P2P) where the intrusion upon one's own privacy or property cannot be easily controlled a priori or without unreasonable effort or expense. To these, existing laws need only be inclusive of the respective technologies.
Thanks for the link, BTW. For all those who haven't read it, there is a link to the text of the actual legislation as well.
Does that annoy you president Bush? I guess that is too bad as I am Canadian, and don't fall under your rules.