Let no one deny we are patriots. We support our nation's troops. Let's hear it for our nation's troops! We have so many veterans here today. Let's here it for the veterans! We are grateful to our veterans who have sacrificed so much for our freedoms. We love our country, we hold dear the values upon which our nation was founded, and we are distressed at what our President, our administration, and our Congress are doing to, and in the name of, our nation.
So to James Evans and these folks who financed this massive radio campaign these last few days, let them understand that blind faith in bad leaders is not patriotism. A patriot does not tell people who are intensely concerned about their country to just sit down and be quiet; to refrain from speaking out in the name of politeness or for the sake of being a good host; to show slavish, blind obedience and deference to a dishonest, war-mongering, human-rights-violating president.
That is not a patriot. Rather, that person is a sycophant. That person is a member of a frightening culture of obedience — a culture where falling in line with authority is more important than choosing what is right, even if it is not easy, safe, or popular. And, I suspect, that person is afraid —afraid we are right, afraid of the truth (even to the point of denying it), afraid he or she has put in with an oppressive, inhumane, regime that does not respect the laws and traditions of our country, and that history will rank as the worst presidency our nation has ever had to endure.
In response to those who believe we should blindly support this disastrous president, his administration, and the complacent, complicit Congress, listen to the words of Theodore Roosevelt, a great president and, I might remind everyone, a Republican, who said: "The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right."
President Roosevelt continued: "Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,"-—listen up Utah Republicans and James Evans, and all the good Republicans listening today—-"or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing"-—President Roosevelt didn't stop there-—"but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
Full transcript of speech: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/09/07/p10597
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 18, 2006]
Note: http://www.thepeoplesvo...

One may ask why the Americans feel the troops are safeguarding their freedoms. Canada and the USA (eventualy) went over to Europe to protect citizens who faced that very threat over half a century ago. Since, these same countries has sent troops back to Europe to help again when specific countries were embroiled in conflict. At no time were or are the freedoms of either country being threatened. The event's of 911 was an Assault and not the first against the USA. The previous assaults were known to have been committed by American citizens themselves. None of these assaults were intended as a take-over of the country. None! Americans deem that sending troops to invade other countries, is protecting their own personal freedoms. No speech endorsing the withdrawl of these same troops can be considered an end to the turmoil they caused and as long as sending troops to foreign countries is considered to "protect their freedoms". The end to American freedoms came when they imposed themselves on others. The reverse has yet to happen since the British ruled their country. And then, it was not their country.
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
In the above article though, I think he was referring to WWII where the inference would be that Hitler was trying to take control of the entire planet. Much like Bushler is now I reckon.
---
Dear Abby, Dear Abby my fountain pen leaks, my wife hollars at me and the kids are all freaks