McKenna Commentary

Posted on Wednesday, January 19 at 16:12 by lgrisley
First, as Canadians, should we not be concerned when high profile advocates of deeper Canadian integration into the US economy (including former Prime Minister Mulroney) extend their enthusiastic and unqualified endorsement for our ambassador? Second, should we not question our ambassador's intimate involvement with American corporate interests and their connection with the global military-industrial complex? Third, should we not be concerned when a former politician is appointed as the ambassador to the most powerful country on the planet when a career diplomat is the traditional choice? Fourth, should we not be concerned when our electronic and print media play the unique role of being stenographers by parroting official press releases about the suitability of a choice for ambassador? It should be pointed out that raising these concerns in no way questions the personal integrity of Mr. McKenna. The salient issue here is about protecting Canadian interests, not American interests, nor multinational interests. And what should be alarming to Canadians is that the Fourth Estate, for any number of reasons, allows the fundamental issues to go unquestioned while other minor issues are mentioned or highlighted. For example, according to the CanWest News Service (Jan.8/05), Brian Mulroney, and George Bush, Sr., spent an hour with President George W. Bush in the Oval Office. Also, Mulroney was reported as saying that Frank McKenna is: "a reliable guy and you can trust him to work co-operatively with the Republican administration in resolving bilateral disputes and dealing with global issues." Unfortunately, CanWest and other media outlets failed to question the meaning of the reference to McKenna as "a reliable guy and you can trust him". Also, more fundamental questions which should be raised are ignored. For example: 1. What is the possible raison d'etre for a former Conservative prime minister, a current Liberal prime minister, a former Liberal premier, a former American president and a current American president to agree on the choice for the most important senior Canadian diplomatic position? 2. Is Frank McKenna a board member with the Carlyle Group along with George Bush, Sr., James A. Baker III, Frank Carlucci, John Major, and other powerful mandarins? 3. What is the investment firm called the Carlyle Group? Is this investment firm really involved with the production of armoured vehicles, artillery, defence electronics and other spheres of the defence and aerospace industry? 4. What is the relationship between the Carlyle Group and the Saudi bin Laden Group? 5. What is McKenna's role with the Carlyle Group? With his appointment, Ambassador McKenna has resigned from all corporate boards. The major question, however, is whether he will be able to represent Canadian interests and resist the pressures from his American corporate friends. More importantly, if McKenna already believes in further economic integration into the U.S. orbit of control, and support for Canadian participation in the US Star Wars, there will be little need for American pressure. It is important to recognize that economic cooperation with the US is critical to our economic health. Clearly, we share a continent, many common traditions, values and beliefs. This should not be underestimated or taken for granted. On the other hand, we should not continue to give away our natural resources to transnational corporations. We must remind Ambassador McKenna that he represents Canadian interests exclusively. While striving for cooperation with the US should be his hallmark, he must be vigilant of the need to defend our economic and geographical independence. In concrete terms, Ambassador McKenna has to establish his reputation as the unequivocal defender of Canadian rights. In fact, if the stories of McKenna's strong personal rapport with the Bush family are true, he might influence them (and other Washington mandarins) with respect to the unfair corporate advantages enshrined in NAFTA or to the folly of the US Star Wars project. On a serio-comic note, if Ambassador McKenna is a bit timid about pointing out to members of the Bush administration how destructive and suicidal Star Wars would be, he could leave copies of Mel Hurtig's "Rushing to Armageddon" scattered throughout the Canadian embassy. Autographed copies would also make lovely gifts. Richard Julien Saskatoon, SK [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 19, 2005]

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:43 am
    I liked the sentiment, except for this line:

    "It is important to recognize that economic cooperation with the US is critical to our economic health. Clearly, we share a continent, many common traditions, values and beliefs. This should not be underestimated or taken for granted."


    I disagree. We can trade with other nations, build a shipping industry, and trade within Canada. The U.S. has proven they won't co-operate with anyone.

    Also, regarding "traditions, values, and beliefs," I never did like it when people are told what they believe as blatantly as this.

    Tell me what you stand for, and I'll decide if I believe in it.

    ---
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter --

    Winston Churchill

  2. Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
    Perhaps we should start a "McKenna Watch" to keep an eye on what kind of antics he gets up to down there?

  3. Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:25 am
    Frank McKenna is a canadian who fights for business interests. He always has been. As premier of New Brunswick he began the public relations brigade that every premier copied, that of hiring a PR staff of well over a hundred in a province with a miniscule population. However, he really went out of his way to try to break up the Irving/McCain duopoly in the province (though bound to fail). I'm not convinced that as ambassador his position will have him 'fighting for canadian interests', that is our job. If we expect these guys in suits to protect the interests of your average canadian we're dreaming.

  4. by N Say
    Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:57 am
    I don't think McKenna is the best choice for ambassador, but he's no worse than John Manley would have been. remember when paul martin offered him the job? now he's working with the organisation that was set up to plan out US world domination. he wouldn't have been any better then mckenna, but there was seemingly no problem with <I>him</I> being ambassador.<p>---<br>"George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  5. Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:11 am
    What I don't understand is how being pro-US translates into being anti-Canadian. Do you believe that US and Canadian interests are so diametrically opposed that to support the US is to dump on Canada?

    I am pro-Canadian *and* pro-American. Where we have legitimate differences with Americans, and especially their government, we should be stand our ground. But picking fights or making petty remarks just for the sake of asserting our independence is just immature chest-thumping.

    When you can answer the question "What does being Canadian mean?" without reference to the US, then you can talk to me about sovereignty. But simply being contrarian in the face of American ideas, culture, etc. is not nationalism. It's childing petulance.

    Canadians aren't Americans, that much is true. But, Michael Adams' pop sociology notwithstanding, those differences don't equate to superiority on our part. Nor do they denote inferiority. There is room on the continent for both of us. We can trade and cooperate with the US without Canada fading away or being absorbed.

    And having someone who knows and has the ear of influential Americans can only benefit us. At the very least he won't be campaigning in American elections the way Chretien's nephew did. Gee, old Raymond does everything short of putting up a Gore sign in front of the embassy back in 2000 and we're surprised that Canada isn't number one on George W's friends list.

  6. Fri Jan 21, 2005 1:04 am
    Yes, under today`s pro corporate, pro NAFTA terms, to be pro US does translate into being anti-Canadian. If the US were more friendly and respectful of Canada, not to mention the rest of the world, then I`d be pro America too. Again, though, saying that doesn`t mean that I hate all Americans.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  7. Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:15 am
    Being Canadian means standing in national health service lines and congratulating each other on how decent everyone is north of the border. Also about how the World Listens to Canada, among other delusions.

  8. Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:26 pm
    Well, since we`re on the topic of delusions, I`d say that anyone who thinks that The US is spreading 'freedom' around the world with it`s corporate fascist oligarchy capitalism, with its 'planted' administration is definitely in need of a reality check!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  9. by RPW
    Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:51 pm
    Well no. <u><i>"anyone who thinks that The US is spreading 'freedom' around the world with it`s corporate fascist oligarchy capitalism"</i></u> is simply hitching a ride, hoping for some of the 'booty' to fall into their own pockets.<p>---<br>RickW

  10. Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:17 am
    I like the American people and their nation as a physical sense, not a political or economic sense. I am for all countries who offer the world something and that promote democracy and peace. The world, however, needs to be fixed. Too many countries have too many problems because of the economy and politics.

    ---
    Alliance Atlantis: A Canadian Film Distribution Company
    Star Wars: Episode III May 2005
    "A person who walks in someone elses footprints leaves no footprints."

  11. Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:11 pm
    McKenna and George Bush have both been giving whole hearted endorsements by Stockwell Day.

    For that reason alone I hope someone looks into Mr McKenna activities.......He did say he (selling Canada to the US)
    Dennis Baker



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news