American-Style Fixed Date Election System A Bad Idea?

Posted on Wednesday, February 25 at 12:00 by sthompson
Nobody has good ideas all the time, and here's a compelling critique of an idea Mel Hurtig has apparently proposed in the past--switching to fixed-date elections. Gordon Campbell and Dalton McGuinty are currently the guys in the gung-ho camp.

The author provides a good overview of the American electoral system and its weaknesses and proposes that instead of fixed-date elections, we should be looking at proportional representation.

Note: switching to fixed-date...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:19 pm
    I have been proposing this for years. I would take it one step further though and that would include making that set date a national holiday.

    More incentive to vote and do your part. Just make sure the holiday falls in the middle of the week so people dont use it as an excuse to take an extra long weekend.

    There are drawbacks to a set date though, such as permanent campaigning on behalf of the talking heads.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  2. Thu Feb 26, 2004 3:25 am
    I can only speak from my experience with Campbell. He\'s likely gung ho because he\'s going to need all the time he can get to try and look his sunday best before next election. And honestly, if he\'s gung ho about anything it would be to his advantage and reason enough for me to be suspicious.

  3. Thu Feb 26, 2004 2:44 pm
    I think it has both good and bad implications.

    Consider that the politicians can wait for the best time when the opposition is in disarray, as Chretien did, much to my chagrin. He will go down in history, but it was pure and simple manipulation that got him the honour of 3 consecutive majority governments. It certainly wasn\'t his performance.

    Besides, even Paul Martin wanted to call another election after only 3 1/2 years since the last, same as Chretien did in 2000. That\'s not good enough.

    There should be at least a 4 year interval before they can call another election.

    They are simply too costly.

    On the other point, the 4th year of a fixed 4 year term will largely become a caretaker year, where everybody knows what is coming and when, so the actual work done by the government could suffer.

    Just a couple of thoughts.

    BTW, I do like the idea.



    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  4. Fri Feb 27, 2004 5:27 am
    GREAT idea Roy!

    A national holiday would improve nation-building in this country, and would DEFINITELY get people talking politics again. Thank you for the great idea........

    P.S. --please, please, don\'t stop with one holiday. :)



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news