Why Canadians Stay Out Of American Wars

Posted on Monday, November 17 at 14:17 by sthompson
English Canadians, who fought ferociously in two world wars at the side of the British, have always been highly leery of American wars that are not waged as part of a broad multilateral alliance. Apprehension about displays of American power go all the way back to the American Revolution that spawned the migration of Loyalists to Canada and to the War of 1812 which featured an American invasion of Upper Canada. Anxiety about American military power was generated anew during the American Civil War when many English Canadians, despite their dislike of slavery, sympathized with the Confederacy, because they feared that with victory the Union army could turn its guns northward.

At the end of the 19th century, the Spanish-American war propelled U.S. marines into Cuba and the Philippines, and this was soon followed by a truculent U.S. posture in a dispute over the boundary between Alaska and Canada. For Canadians, the U.S. military was becoming associated with occupations of distant lands and even with threats to Canada itself. In 1961, when the Kennedy administration financed and dispatched anti-Castro Cubans to the Bay of Pigs, not a few Canadians, including members of the Diefenbaker government, chuckled discretely when Washington's plot came unstuck.

Given this historical background, it is not surprising that so many English Canadians were resistant from the start to U.S. adventures in Vietnam and Iraq.

For their part, French Canadians have their own distinct anti-war tradition. At times that has put them into sharp conflict with the rest of Canada, but in the cases of Vietnam and Iraq, it put them on them same page as English Canadians who opposed participation in those conflicts.

French Canada's anti-war tradition had the British Empire rather than the United States as its focus. At the end of the nineteenth century, when the British government asked Ottawa for contingents of soldiers to fight in the South African war, French Canadian nationalists under the leadership of Henri Bourassa objected strenuously. It was the job of Britain to defend a colony such as Canada, they argued, not the job of the colony to defend distant parts of the empire.

The First World War was seen through the same lens by most French Canadians, who were not roused by the prospect of fighting in a British imperial war, even one in which they would be fighting to defend France, their long estranged mother country. When Ottawa introduced conscription toward the end of the war, there were riots in Quebec City and even talk of Quebec secession from Canada. The issue of conscription again divided French from English Canada during the Second World War.

Quebec's antagonism to conscription was a major reason why Canada, unlike other major western countries, did not impose compulsory military service during the post war decades. French Canadian opposition to sending troops to fight overseas weighed heavily on the Pearson government during the 1960s when Lyndon Johnson was looking for reinforcements for his war in Vietnam. In keeping with this long tradition, Quebecers were solidly against participation in the recent war in Iraq.

Jean Chretien's shrewd decision not to commit Canada to the Iraq War kept him out of the political morass in which both Tony Blair and George W. Bush now are mired. The decision was more than personal, however. The Prime Minister had behind him long established traditions in both English and French Canada, that are quite unlike those south of the border.

---
James Laxer, a professor of political science at York University, is the author of _The Border: Canada, the U.S. and Dispatches from the 49th Parallel_.

This original article is posted by request.

Note: James Laxer

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:08 pm
    A very interesting article.<p> <i>what makes Canadians so much more resistant than Americans to the siren call to fight in unilateral U.S. wars, such as those in Vietnam and Iraq?</i><p> I'd like to think we aren't ruled by our passions and fears as our cousins to the south are. To some Americans, all you have to do is mention the word 'Communist' and they run to get their shotgun. We tend to look objectively at something (even ourselves) and make a well informed decision.<p> Nowadays, all you have to do is invoke the word 'Terrorist'. Some are starting to come out of their Sept 11th shock and see what is going on.<p> But the Shrub administration already knew that. That's why they aren't allowing the filming of the bodys of US soldiers when they land from overseas, or funerals of the dead. Americans would wake up faster if a planeload of young soldiers was carried off the plane every day and broadcast on CNN that night. Right now, they are just numbers.<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  2. Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:43 pm
    The media and how it presents events also plays a tremendous part in how a country views the choice to go to war or not.

    It was very clear looking at IRaq that American media did not portray the whole story and in some cases (read Fox Network) were very one-sided in pushing for war. Even still the media in the US is failing the citizens of that nation. There are so many unaswered and unchallenged questions.

    Here in Canada even our rightwing media played fair and brought a fairly balanced approach to the news over Iraq. Canada as well is one of the most wired nations in the world, and the internet is a great source of independant news and information.

    As for basic mentality one needs do no more than log on to any discussion group and you will find dozens of ditto-heads that do no more than repeat what they hear on talk-radio or on the fox network. Even today I read a bunch that stated Iraq had nukes and the British are a bunch of traitors for protesting against bush because Saddam was ready to nuke them at a moments notice... you get the point. Maybe more Canadians are just not as trusting of what they hear without verifying it first with other sources and/or opinions.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  3. Tue Nov 18, 2003 1:04 am
    Communism! Vote for you anonymous friend as Canada\'s Stalin!!! Help bring communism, and a tender-loving leader to Canada.....Let\'s place bets as to how long it takes the U.S. to \"Liberate\" us.......starting odds are 5 to 3 that it will happen within the first month!!

  4. Tue Nov 18, 2003 4:55 am
    Hello little Troll! How are you?<p><p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  5. Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:30 am
    This was one area that I believe Chretien rose to the occassion and really saw the sell out of his birth country coming straight at him. I was proud that he didn\'t support the war effort, although we know that we did behind the scenes, but it almost seemed as though Chretien finally realized the truth about the NAFTA etc. and that the country he had served but not served as well as he should have; will be sold fast and furious by Martin. I felt as if he wished he had done more, that he wished he wasn\'t handing the reigns to Martin. This was the most reluctant change of power I have ever seen and I didn\'t feel it was because Chretien was losing power, but he knows he, like the rest of us, will be losing our country! Staying out of this war was his last stand for patriotism, unfortunately too little too late!

  6. Wed Nov 19, 2003 3:52 pm
    Yes, on sooo many things, Chretien either didn`t act, or pretended to act too late! That is the Chretien legacy- quietly help to dismantle Canada, while trying to make himself look like the good guy at the end!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  7. Fri Nov 21, 2003 8:00 am
    I\'m okay doctor, can you inspect me for radiation?

  8. Mon May 24, 2004 11:58 am
    The Creator of the Heavens and the Earth always had a city of Refuge for the unjustly treated people of the earth.Canada was one of those Cities, I am not sure of what will happen to Canada now that the good guys are dead or out of politics. One thing I do know, Elohim is the governor of the nations. Keep out of other mens' business Canada.Sin is a reproach to any nation.

  9. Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:21 pm
    12,000 Canadians volunteered to serve with the U.S. military in Vietnam. Not everyone thinks like you. Not all Canadians are wussies.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news