EU Insists On International Control Of Net

Posted on Saturday, October 01 at 15:18 by jensonj
A stalemate over who should serve as the principal traffic cops for Internet routing and addressing could derail the summit, which aims to ensure a fair sharing of the Internet for the benefit of the whole world. At issue is who would have ultimate authority over the Internet’s master directories, which tell Web browsers and e-mail programs how to direct traffic. That role has historically gone to the United States, which created the Internet as a Pentagon project and funded much of its early development. The U.S. Commerce Department has delegated much of that responsibility to a U.S.-based private organization with international board members, but Commerce ultimately retains veto power. Some countries have been frustrated that the United States and European countries that got on the Internet first gobbled up most of the available addresses required for computers to connect, leaving developing nations with a limited supply to share. They also want greater assurance that as they come to rely on the Internet more for governmental and other services, their plans won’t get derailed by some future U.S. policy. Policy decisions could at a stroke make all Web sites ending in a specific suffix essentially unreachable. Other decisions could affect the availability of domain names in non-English characters or ones dedicated to special interests such as pornography. http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/TechNews/Internet/2005/09/30/pf-1242850.html

Note: http://cnews.canoe.ca/C...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:37 pm
    Just what we need. Another institution to dictate to the world as to whom ,how and what. Internet control for the mass's by those who feel they have the right to control. Why shouldn't they leave the censorship to those countries that support that ideal. The USA & China are not qualified either to monitor global use and should stick to their own perimeters. Like those two countries, it is not up to the EU to be control.

  2. by hoopoe
    Sun Oct 02, 2005 3:54 am
    It's quite the laugh that the US even thinks they control the internet now. The fact is that it is not in the hands of any one country now and any politician who thinks otherwise simply does not understand how the internet actually works. All anyone has to do to escape the laws of one country is to run a server in another one beyond that country's laws of extradition. Why do they think so many illegal porn servers are located in the former eastern bloc countries of the USSR.

  3. Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:42 am
    No universal law can exist even if the USA thinks theirs prevail. The EU can't do any better and shame on them attempting to do what the Americans are trying to do. Granted, Child Porn is an evil. Internet users can do what the Americans did to Iraq web sites they didn't favour. Spam the F out of them.

  4. by mk
    Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:39 pm
    This isn't about censorship, it's about domain name to IP address mapping. That alone cannot effectively be used for censorship. Further, we're talking about a technical standard; someone needs to ultimately steer it, otherwise it wouldn't work!

    U.S. Commerce Dept. should certainly not have ultimate veto (no single government should), although Commerce is probably the least likely to implement restrictive policy based on politics. If internet structure was approved by the UN Security Council we probably wouldn't have it.

  5. by hoopoe
    Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:27 pm
    Why don't they spam the fuck out of the porn web sites then; they also claim to oppose them?

  6. Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:23 am
    You would think that hackers with nothing to do but cause grief.....would take it on.

  7. Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:30 am
    The EU consists of a bunch of old cronies that can't compete in the market place so they try to get power through politics. If Chirac wants to control the internet, why doesn't he make a better internet that will usurp the existing internet.

    Allocating IP addresses and domain names on the basis of politics will only hurt the internet. The EU should stick to doing what it does best, whining. Leave ultimate control with a country that knows how to be successful, the U.S.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news