"The Arctic is Russian," expedition leader and parliamentary deputy Artur Chilingarov insisted last night as he set sail from Murmansk.
"We are going to be the first to put a flag there, a Russian flag at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean, at the very point of the North Pole."

And meaningless. Planting a flag is just a photo-op. It's commercial use that matters, in the new treaties with respect to the sea. If the continental shelf that Canada lies on is also under the North pole, then the North Pole belongs to Canada. Or Denmark. It's geology and commerce that trumps a shiny flag.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
Could the Canadian government, by proclamation, accept this and be done with it? Or am I too naive to think this is going to happen?
In the meantime, the Arctic sovereignty dispute of real significance for Canadians is the developing one between Canada and the US regarding the ownership of the burgeoning Beaufort Sea gas resources. Could talk about Russian assertiveness in the Arctic serve to dissemble the recent signing of an SPP continental energy accord effectively giving those resources to the US?
Moreover, at a time when Putin is being demonized in the American media, might it not dispose Canadians to believe our southern "cousins" will protect us from the nasty Russian bear? It's a story the American administration would love to have percolating when the "three amigos" get together in Montebello next month for their much-criticized (and secretive) SPP summit on the final phase of continental integration!