Ottawa Pushes To Sell Energy, Wood To China

Posted on Wednesday, October 12 at 13:30 by jensonj
"This is not a threat, and there is no linkage," Mr. McCallum said in an interview yesterday. "I am saying that Canada is pursuing its national interest to sell our energy resources and our other resources all around the world to get the best price and the most secure markets that we can." But like Mr. Martin and other senior government officials who addressed the issue over the weekend, Mr. McCallum, while insisting there is no linkage between softwood and energy, explicitly reiterated the link. "The government is saying that if the U.S. doesn't respect NAFTA rules on wood, then what does that mean for NAFTA rules in other areas, including energy?" Mr. McCallum said. "Canada believes that NAFTA is too important for both of our countries to sow doubts like this in people's minds." Under the Bush administration, the United States has officially re-classified China as a "strategic competitor." In conservative circles in Washington, China is increasingly viewed as the United States' next great economic and military rival. With well over a billion people, annual economic growth upwards of nine per cent and foreign exchange reserves of $711-billion, second only to Japan, China has enormous purchasing power. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20051011.wxxchina11/BNStory/National/ [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 15, 2005]

Note: http://www.theglobeandm...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:35 pm
    Great, now we can be hewers of wood and oil for a Communist Dictatorship--as opposed to the United States.

    Thanks a lot Mr. Martin for caring abour Canadian ownership and manufacutring jobs.

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  2. Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:20 pm
    Well the US does not play fair or honour trade deals, so why shouldn't we look for other countries to buy our lumber, oil etc? China (and India) are booming economies and offer a huge potential for us to sell our goods and products to.

  3. Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:42 pm
    It's typical Canada and typical globalism. We are independent in resources and skilled workers, but they want us to sell raw lumber to a Communist country full of unskilled labour so they can sell us their discount furniture back to us.

    Canada is SO badly run it is insane.

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  4. Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:49 pm
    So what kind of dictator would you call Bush?
    The EU is attempting to make all sorts of sacrifices to get into the US market. Canada is soon to be without trade with the US. The Americans don't want to take over the world-market for free. They want to get paid to take it. There is nothing wrong for the country to put themselves ahead but pushing every one back is a US thing, not Canadian. Canada can't afford to pay the Americans to take their trade and it ain't free no more.

  5. Thu Oct 13, 2005 4:52 am
    We will have trade with the U.S. were we to exercise our muscle....or our business class could get off their ass and do something.

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  6. by eugene
    Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:48 am
    See my blog comment on this at:<br />
    <a href="http://redbetweenthelines.modblog.com/?show=blogview&blog_id=758096">http://redbetweenthelines.modblog.com/?show=blogview&blog_id=758096</a>

  7. Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:30 pm
    I rather see more trade with Europe and Japan than the USA and China.

    ---
    "A person who walks in someone elses footprints leaves no footprints." Chinese Proverb

  8. Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:16 pm
    I agree with the above. Diversification of trade to offset trade with the big neighbour was always with non-communist countries in Europe and Japan, and this was logical for Canada and ideologically proper. The Berlin Wall fell, but Tiananmen Square has not been undone. Until China changes politically, trade with China should be minimum.

  9. Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:38 am
    Europe and Japan are both very protectionist.

    -Perturbed.

  10. Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:22 pm
    China trade should be minimal. Very astute point. Our government is so stupid. Canada is so French. We hate our friends and suck up to our enemies. Now we would rather trade with communists then the free world. Which makes us an unreliable supplier and we couldn't even sell oil to the Chinese anyway. No pipeline. And the good folks on this site wonder why we have so little respect in the world. Any respect we get is in our own minds. Thank god this government has nothing to do with me. I would never vote for these mental midgets. I'm so surprised that people who write to this site always want the Canadian government to take some action. Every time they open their mouth they seem all the dozier with Mr. Dithers leading the pack and Mr. Petticoat bringing up the rear. Canada is a very nice country to live in but the best value is the comic value. What other country could produce politicians like us?

  11. Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:33 pm
    Instead of selling "raw, unprocessed" products from lumber and oil and grain and whatever, Canada should promote the export of processed (or even semi-processed) products. This will result in added value.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news