Trittin's spokesman, Michael Schrören, said on Wednesday that "Trittin's comments were true and he wrote what he meant."
Trittin, however, is not the only critic of the US environmental policy in Germany. Reinhard Bütikofer, who heads the German Green party, of which Foreign Minister is also a member, called Bush an "eco-reactionary."
"Bush conducts his environmental policy from the perspective of oil and nuclear lobby," said Bütikofer.
Karsten Voigt, foreign ministry coordinator for German-US cooperation, tried to strike a balance between being critical of US policies and showing sympathy for the United States by saying that Tritten's comments were accurate but badly timed.
"One should be more diplomatic than Mr. Trittin was, but there is general consensus in Germany that climate change is a major issue," Voigt said.
Too rich to ask for help?
Germans donated in record numbers in the aftermath of the Asian tsunami eight months ago. But the situation is different today: the US government has made no call for international aid, and German charity organizations have so far not pledged financial aid for the hurricane-affected regions.
"We are at the moment planning no call for help," said Fredrik Barkenhammar of the German Red Cross.
According to Barkenhammar, the American Red Cross is financially very well positioned and has, therefore, not asked for outside help. Should the German Red Cross receive any public or private donations for the American disaster relief, the money will be transferred to the US Red Cross, he said.
Not exactly a catastrophe?
Damage caused by hurricane Katrina will certainly have international consequences, according to Swiss Re, the world's second largest insurance company. The firm said Wednesday that Katrina would cost the insurance industry alone about $20 billion (16.2 billion euros).
Many believe, however, that the scope of the disaster is such that the US government, which has one of the most sophisticated crisis management systems in the world at its disposal, should be able to respond to it adequately.
"Catastrophe means that a society cannot cope with a situation," said Achim Reinke, spokesperson for the Catholic aid organization Caritas.
"We need to stay balanced," Reinke said, pointing out that there are other crisis regions in the world, like Sudan's war-torn Darfur region, that shouldn't be forgotten.
Author DW staff (tt)
http://www.dw-world.de © Deutsche Welle
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 7, 2005]
Note: http://www.dw-world.de

<br />
Hurricane seasons (number, and intensity) are cyclic. On the order of multiple decades.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/">http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/</a><br />
<br />
"...The 1886 hurricane season has been analyzed to be the busiest on record for the continental United States.<br />
The 1890s were one of the busiest decades on record for the Atlantic seaboard of the United States...<br />
<br />
These records reflect the existence of cycles of hurricane activity, rather than trends toward more frequent or stronger hurricanes. In general, the period of the 1850s to the mid-1860s was quiet, the late 1860s through the 1890s were busy and the first decade of the 1900s were quiet....<br />
<br />
Longest lasting hurricane on record: Storm #3 (also known as the "San Ciriaco" hurricane for its impact in Puerto Rico in 1899 has been re-analyzed to now tie the record for longest lasting tropical cyclone in the Atlantic basin. It began on August 3 in the tropical North Atlantic, hit Puerto Rico as a Category 4 hurricane on the 8th, hit North Carolina as a Category 3 hurricane on the 18th, transformed into an extratropical system north of Bermuda on the 21st, redeveloped into a tropical storm on the 26th, went through the Azores Islands as a Category 1 hurricane on the 3rd of September and finally dissipated as an extratropical storm on the 4th. It was a storm system for 33 days and a tropical storm or hurricane for 28 of those days. This ties the record with Hurricane Ginger of 1971, which also was a tropical cyclone for 28 days..."<br />
<br />
But, let's just ignore the facts and blame Bush, eh?
Okay, he makes it so easy and he knows how to shift it as quick as anyone tries to attatch it to him. He's absolutely resposibility free. He ain't even the president.
instantly dismiss all criticism as partisan.
FEMA and other federal agencies were extremely
tardy to the point of willful negligence.
Apparently, the Bush administration has the absolute
right to be immune to all criticism, whether they
commit mass murder or act catastrophic or even
apocalyptic."If yer not with us, yer against us".
A truly blind, oblivious, corrupt clannish
administration.Neo-fascist, deceptive, evasive
and RUTHLESS.
No one blames Bush for the Hurricane.But his
administration's *policies* (cutting New orleans
disaster preparedness, sucking resources dry with
the iraq war, and destroying the natural
wetlands) have exacerbated the impact... and
caused a woefully incompetent/negligent response.
Next thing, FEMA will demand a 200% increase
in funding ! You know... the more catastrophic
the crisis, the more crisis management the Bush
administration calls for.
I guess I'm anti-American, eh ? As if the
Bush administration is the only possible
manifestation of Americanism.
As for the environmental argument, it can't
be dismissed and is *probably* valid.