What Is Canadian Conservatism?

Posted on Tuesday, November 25 at 14:33 by sthompson
If we are ever going to seriously understand historic Canadian conservatism (rather than its present mutation and distortion), we need to go to the beginning of the Canadian drama to get a fix and feel for such a tradition. Anglo-Canadian High Toryism (from which conservatism was birthed and is a legitimate child) can be found within the Anglican heritage. Anglicans have often been called Tories at prayer, and the two most prominent Anglican Bishops in Canada (Bishops Inglis and Strachan) were both deeply suspicious of American republican ideas and American expansionistic and imperial tendencies. Inglis was a United Empire Loyalist who fled the American Revolution in 1776, and Strachan was at the forefront of defending the fledgling Canadian way against the invasion by the Americans (of Canada) in 1812. So, we can see, the very birth of Canada was founded on a resistance to the American way of life.

It is this form of Canadian Toryism that gave us Sir John A. Macdonald (whose ‘National Vision’ was meant to build a true north strong and free). It was Macdonald who fought, again and again, against the liberals that sought to integrate and annex Canada with the United States. Most of the Conservative Canadian Prime Ministers (such as Macdonald, Borden, Meighen, Bennett and Diefenbaker) exerted much effort and gave the best of their energies to defend Canada and define it in such a way that it could not be confused with or assimilated into the United States. It is this form of Toryism/Conservatism that has always contested the drift and direction of Republicanism/Liberalism.

We do not need to read too far or too deep into the writings of such Canadian literary worthies as Thomas Haliburton, Susanna Moodie, Catherine Parr Traill, William Kirby, Charles Mair, George Denison, Stephen Leacock or Mazo de la Roche to get a feel for the texture of Canadian conservatives as they touch on culture and the larger questions of nationhood and sovereignty. The 19th century saw the emergence of the Imperial Federation League and the Canada First movement. It is this type of conservatism that cannot be equated with either the so called conservatism of Thatcher/Reagan or the way conservatism is used by Blue Tories in the PC party or by the Alliance Party; needless to say, such positions and ideologies are republican and liberal.

If we ever hope, as Canadians, to reclaim what it means to be a Canadian conservative, we, initially, need to expose and call into question how the word is being used today. Until this is done, there will be much confusion, and we will, increasingly so, march to the beat of the American way and tune. If we ever hope to free ourselves from the power of the American gravitational pull, much work is needed. The New Romans to the south will, understandably so, fight back (as will the comprador class in Canada that serves the empire’s interests).

The first task, it seems to me, is to be grounded and rooted in Canadian history and the struggles we have fought not to be Americans. If we have no sense of history, if we have no memory, if Orwellian like, all that is important is thrown away, we have no way to defend ourselves at a basic level of thought and language. It is by knowing our intellectual and political history that we can defend ourselves against its distortions. There is, of course, more to the struggle than this, but at a basic level if Canadians do not even know the difference between a conservative and liberal, it is most difficult to get the thoughtful (with a concern for the commonweal and Canadian sovereignty) to join the PC party.

There is no doubt that the major media do much to baffle the average reader, and it is equally true that much contemporary education does little to teach, in a serious way, a serious and substantive understanding of Canadian history. The conservative Canadian historian, Donald Creighton, often spoke about how the liberal authorized reading of Canadian history caricatured the authentic conservative way. Such an insight finds a true echo in John Ralston Saul’s , REFLECTIONS OF A SIAMESE TWIN: CANADA AT THE END OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY(1997), in which the liberal view of Canada is idealized and the classic conservative way is demeaned and distorted. Saul’s authorized reading of Canadian history may serve and suit his interests well, but, as serious intellectual history it is weak and wanting.

Those who are interested in a turn to a more genuine Canadian conservatism might want to read, as a primer, Taylor’s Radical Tories, Orchard’s The Fight for Canada, any of Dalton Camp’s books, George Grant’s Lament for a Nation, Leacock’s The Unsolved Riddle of Social Justice or my own The Red Tory Tradition.

-RSD

Ron Dart teaches in the Dept. of Political Science and Philosophy at the University College of the Fraser Valley in Abbotsford, B.C. He is editor of The Red Tory Review and has published numerous articles and two books of poetry. Dart is also the political science advisor to the Leaock Home/Museum in Orillia.

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:59 pm
    As long as there are enough Canadians who teach the real histories and pass on the cultural traits, then Canada will never die! It is sad that the media ignores the great achievements and moments in our history, but we can still pass on the stories! But unfortunately, today, there really is little or no difference between liberals and conservatives.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:09 am
    There are plenty of Candians teaching Canadian history, it's the media who are largely American influenced. <p> Over the din of Brittney, (c)rap music and Reality shows, we need to work hard to get the message across.<p> I blame the lefties :)<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  3. Wed Nov 26, 2003 1:08 am
    I suggest that everyone read The Vanishing Country, by Mel Hurtig. In this book, Mel makes it quite clear that the students in Canada have very little knowledge of Canadian history. The teachers are concerned, and he worked with the teachers to conduct a survey that showed most students couldn\'t answer 6 of 10 questions immigrants are required to answer.

    More to the point, it seems our libraries are full of American books, some with the picture of Lincoln on the cover. Based on that, and my own experience in high school, what you call History they call Social Studies. They don\'t seem to be the same thing.

    We can do better in our school systems.




    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  4. Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:32 am
    Don\'t forget Dr. Caleb, Canada has its own breed of better-educated, thoughtful rap artists, who differ greatly from Americans. (Black Canadians stick out like a sore thumb, actually.) I consider the success of the likes of: Maestro, Snow, Choclair, Ghetto Concept, Thrust, Swollen Members, (heh) Jellystone, Kardinal Offishall, the Rascalz, and others as a sign that young Canadians LIKE CANADIAN CULTURE. You may hate the music personally, but TRUST ME -THESE ARE THE ONLY RECORDING ARTISTS YOUNG CANADIANS WON\'T RIP-OFF!

  5. Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:38 am
    But there aren\'t, Dave. Schools only teach 2-3 years of mediocre history curriculum, with a STRONG LIBERAL BIAS. You should have seen my grade 10 history book from a few years back. They praised Liberal PMs throughout, and made every PC PM sound like the devil in waiting....never did add up, but I didn\'t understand why -until now. Why don\'t we mandate 12 years of history? (Or at least 8 -start em\' young, while they\'re fresh \'n\' impressionable.)We\'re allowed to, aren\'t we? And what about French? After grade 9, it isn\'t required.....we should have exchange programs in Quebec.....we are a bilingual country.

  6. Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:48 am
    My Canadian history story was repeated year after year, the same story about the English and the French, John Cabot and Jacques Cartier, follow the dotted map etc. Not much else, other than one year of coverage on the native people\'s which was interesting but never went very deep or very far, as in up to about 1880 or so. I often wondered what happened in Canada after that, but since I was just following what I was being taught I never questioned. The most political time in my childhood history was 1967, when we all learned to sing CANADA...we love thee etc. One hundred years to celebrate, of course it went downhill from there. You know the rest!

    But I did see a very interesting profile of Maude Barlow on the biography channel, called, \'Democracy a la Maude\', just excellent, current history and very telling about what can be done with a little effort and the will to not be intimidated!

  7. Wed Nov 26, 2003 9:47 pm
    I think it\'s important to insert the mention that it was a fight to get Canadian-centric materials curricula into schools and elsewhere. The fight Mel Hurtig had just to get a Canadian encyclopedia published is an example--he did it in large part because when he visited schools, the encyclopedias in the libraries were all American. And he had a hell of time getting the thing done, because it was Canadian. This is only within the past couple of decades. Robin Mathews and others have also led battles to get Canadian-centric material out there. Let\'s not take it for granted.

    The basic problem is not a \"liberal bias\" but that there are still too many assumptions in this country that Canada is \"just like\" the U.S. People look to the south and assume things are the same here--or perhaps more accurately people receive so much info from the U.S. that they don\'t even realize it when they\'re parroting U.S. realities--and that is a problem that goes far beyond high school social studies. Leftists are against nationalism because they assume Canadian nationalism is like U.S. nationalism (it isn\'t)--professional political journalists call Chretien a \"lame duck\" even though it\'s not possible to have such an animal in our Canadian political system (see the Robin Mathews column on this)--regular people think that our own cops will tell you \"you have the right to remain silent, anything you say...\" when in Canada it\'s different (and 10 bucks to the person who can recite our Canadian version--although that may mean you\'ve been in trouble with the law before ;). These are the problems we need to address--everyday assumptions that create colonized minds in unknowing Canadians. The confusion of Canadian conservatism with American conservatism is just one example.

  8. Wed Nov 26, 2003 9:53 pm
    My previous comment concerning this subject was also meant to reflect the fact that I too, was taught a version of Canadian history which really downplayed great Canadian achievements, or ignored them all together. I also see a lot of Canadians who are brainwashed into thinking that we are this frozen, empty wasteland with nothing to offer, and that we are so dependent on the United States for everything. This of course, is RUBBISH! I don`t think, doc, that you can blame either lefties or righties for this. I just think that it started with Diefenbaker cancelling the Arrow, which left a pall over the country. Then, as much as I liked Trudeau, I think his multi cultural platform, although a good one, tended to downplay Canadian signifigance as well. Then you had traitors like Mulroney and Chretien that just made us look like a joke even more!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  9. Thu Nov 27, 2003 4:20 am
    1. Susan, I was talking about the recent school history textbooks. (grade 10 -the 1900s.) There IS a Liberal bias, although I\'m not sure it\'s intentional.

    2. What DO Canadian cops say?

  10. Sun Nov 30, 2003 3:53 pm
    From my experience I have to say that the textbooks also heavily censor the Canadian elements. The mentally colonized exist in many walks of life, from the textbook makers, school boards, and even the cops! As for cops, now, I know it would be wrong to generalize all police into such a category, but I sense a complacency, or a blind sense of duty, which is carried out even if the orders are given from an ever increasingly oppressive, pro- American, right wing style of governing!

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news