To establish identification, people will need more than just proof of insurance and vehicle registration. They'll have to produce a combination of birth certificates, Social Security numbers, marriage licenses and proof of residency (such as utility bills, etc.). Immigrants will have to produce proof of citizenship as well.
Unless an extension is granted, the changes will take place starting in 2008.
All the states are scrambling to decide how best to comply with the new federal law. There are related changes for those planning to travel out of the United States. Under a Department of Homeland Security initiative announced in April, all citizens of Western Hemisphere nations entering the United States, and all U.S. citizens re-entering the country from those nations, must have passports.
The changes would impact travel between the U.S. and many nations, but especially Canada. And so that's the focus of Secretary Land's innovative proposal: Since Michigan and Canada have such close ties, why can't Michigan design a driver's license to meet the Real ID Act rules and also double as a passport?
Land has met with both federal and Canadian officials. Both are interested. Homeland Security officials are interested in using the proposal as a pilot project. The Canadians like the idea because, as one embassy spokesman put it, "We need something that is simple ... verifiable and something that is going to serve those communities on both sides of the border."
We like Land's proposal because it seeks to balance competing interests in national security and economic prosperity.
Some won't see it that way, though. One American Civil Liberties Union official called Land's plan "a national ID card on steroids." Some libertarians and conservatives will feel the same way.
We have our own concerns -- more practical ones. Would this plan mean a driver's license that is as bulky as a present passport? Or could a single computerized card be packed with the necessary identification? How much more costly will it be for residents, many of whom will not use a passport?
The truth is that too many of those who would do us harm are running around freely in this huge nation. A better system of identifying people is crucial, but the challenge is to not allow that system to bring commerce and travel to a halt.
--The Jackson Citizen Patriot
http://www.mlive.com/news/jacitpat/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1126800371195640.xml&coll=3
Note: http://www.mlive.com/ne...

One American Civil Liberties Union official called Land's plan "a national ID card on steroids."
Would this plan mean a driver's license that is as bulky as a present passport? Or could a single computerized card be packed with the necessary identification? How much more costly will it be for residents, many of whom will not use a passport? <<
What about Bio-identification systems?
Bio-identification systems can be divided into two main types: visual and electronic.
Visual bio-identification methods include use of photographs, signatures and/or finger or thumb prints on identity cards. These are relatively low cost to implement and administer. Many off-the-shelf identity card issuing systems incorporate inclusion of photographs and signatures. At polling places, polling staff are expected to compare the photographs, signatures and/or finger or thumb prints on the identity cards with the voters.
This process has its weaknesses, as signature and finger print comparison is a highly skilled process that polling staff can not be expected to master, and a person's appearance can often change significantly from that contained in an identity photograph, particularly if the photograph is not updated regularly. Nevertheless this kind of identity system will probably suffice in most cases where the risk of voting fraud is not unacceptably high.
If visual bio-identification systems are not considered secure enough, electronic bio-identification systems can be used. Electronic bio-identification systems can include digitised voice, hand print, finger/thumb print, or retinal (eye) images. Using these systems, digital records of a person's voice or physical features are stored on disk or smartcard and compared to the actual features of the person using some form of electronic reader. Access is only provided where there is an exact match.
Electronic bio-identification systems are expensive to acquire and administer, and may not be practical for use with the general voting population (although this may change as the relevant technology becomes more widespread and cheaper). However, they are a feasible option for providing security at sensitive locations such as work places and counting centres.
Let's not forget DNA identification as well as all information about ones self that may be on any data base in North America including the world.
The main problem with all of this is and has never been addressed - who (OWNS) the data collected on each and everyone us and who has a right to access it? What are the limitations?
Who determines what can be done with this data and information?
Who has a right to profit from this information?
Who pays for the storage and protection of this data?
And what about system glitches? Do we suddenly disappear?
What legal recourse do we as individuals have to protect our selves from being abused and victimized by legitimate and non legitimate Governments, institutions, Companies, Businesses and individuals in all the nations of the World?
The United States of America is asking for a lot of trust me attitude from the rest of us in this World with no recourse.
---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.
Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.