Judge Lifts Lid On Secret Arar File

Posted on Wednesday, July 25 at 14:50 by drcaleb
But he also ruled that the remaining information be kept secret on the grounds it would be harmful and that the public interest is best served by keeping it confidential. Because of the nature of the information being contested, Judge NoIl issued a separate, non-public judgment yesterday, detailing for lawyers on both sides what information should be disclosed and why. http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/story.html?id=b099d81d-0b92-46dd-b078-29b28a233b8c&k=70838

Note: http://www.canada.com/o...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:16 pm
    "the federal government has been ordered to release *some* of the information ... "

    Business as usual. Read no further. End of story.

  2. Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:41 pm
    *some* of the information ... "

    Only what they want to release. Not even a start of a story.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  3. Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:02 pm
    From the article:

    "At issue are 1,500 words the government ordered Arar commissioner Justice Dennis O'Connor to excise from his September public report because of national security concerns. That despite the judge's insistence that the information posed no such threat, an opinion supported by Reid Morden, former head of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

    The court action was launched by the federal government under Section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act, which allows the government to keep secret "potentially injurious ... sensitive" information related to national security, dealings with foreign governments and defence."

    1500 words isn't even a page.

    ---
    The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.

  4. Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:43 am
    "Judge lifts lid on secret Arar file"

    Not even the right headline either.

    Yeah, the Judge lifts lid on secret Arar file alright, but won't let the hopelessly blind denizens of a supposedly free and open society take a peek - a slap in the face after the government royally screwed over one of its own subjects.

    The Judge of course is under the employ of the government he is protecting, so no big surprise with the judgment.

  5. Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:55 pm
    "the Canada Evidence Act,'

    One can also ask for protection under the Act if self incriminating. I wonder if the wrong section has been applied.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news