NDP's Peter Julian Fights For Full Disclosure Of Agreements On NAU

Posted on Wednesday, October 04 at 14:50 by sthompson
_____________________________________________ From: NDP/NPD Communications Sent: October 4, 2006 9:33 AM To: NDP/NPD Communications Subject: CONSERVATIVES PLAN TO FAST TRACK NEW LIMITS ON CANADIAN SOVEREIGNTY / LES CONSERVATEURS VEULENT RESTREINDRE LA SOUVERAINETÉ CANADIENNE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OCTOBER 4, 2006 CONSERVATIVES PLAN TO FAST TRACK NEW LIMITS ON CANADIAN SOVEREIGNTY NDP demands accountability from Harper OTTAWA – NDP International Trade Critic, Peter Julian, MP (Burnaby-New Westminster), along with Teresa Healy, spokesperson for the Canadian Labour Congress and Jean-Yves Lefort, spokesperson for Common Frontiers, declared that they will be redoubling their collective efforts to halt the stealth takeover of Canada by the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), and to bring this corporate agenda to the public’s attention. “This is the giving away of Canada’s command to the U.S, Republican administration and to North America’s largest corporations,” stated Julian. “We are seeing this with the Softwood Lumber Agreement and with the Canadian Wheat Board, as well as in a variety of other sectors. Stephen Harper is following the legacy of Paul Martin and the Liberal Party and is willing to give anything away in pursuit of so-called good Canada-U.S. relations.” Current Conservative cabinet ministers, former ministers from the previous Liberal governments, officials from Canada, Mexico and the US, North America’s top corporate executives and top military brass met at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel on September 12-14, 2006. Neither the general public from all three countries nor the media were informed about this meeting. The Harper government has so far refused to release any information. The event was organized by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. The SPP was launched in March of 2005 as a trilateral initiative to fast-track the integration of Canada and Mexico with the United States through the harmonization of 300 common areas of legislation and regulations. Since Paul Martin, Vicente Fox and George W. Bush signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership, discussions on their continental integration have gone underground. “Through the SPP, business and government executives are meeting in secret to deepen the de-regulation and competitive pressures that undermine labour rights, decent wages and working conditions. Workers want to know - what happened to democracy?” stated Teresa Healy. "The North American Competitive Council (NACC) is made up of corporate executives from some of the largest enterprises in Canada, the US and Mexico. They have been anointed as the exclusive advisers to government Ministries involved in implementing the SPP. In this arrangement, the opinions of the people from the three countries are not welcome," declared Jean-Yves Lefort. “What this means for Canada is lower standards and quality of life in many areas, such as food security, air safety, environmental norms, health care and labour rights. It’s a recipe for lowering standards in our country. This is unacceptable to most Canadians,” noted Julian. The NDP will be fighting over the next few months to get full disclosure of any agreements the Harper government is entering into and will be sending access to information requests to ensure that Canadians become aware of what is at stake. - 30 - For further information, please contact: Gaby Senay, Press Secretary: 613-295-9228 ***** POUR DIFFUSION IMMÉDIATE LE 4 OCTOBRE 2006 LES CONSERVATEURS VEULENT RESTREINDRE LA SOUVERAINETÉ CANADIENNE Le NPD demande des comptes à Stephen Harper OTTAWA – Le porte-parole du NPD en matière de commerce international, le député Peter Julian (Burnaby - New Westminster), ainsi que Teresa Healy, porte-parole du Congrès du Travail du Canada, et Jean-Yves Lefort, porte-parole de Common Frontiers, ont déclaré qu’ils redoubleront leurs efforts communs pour empêcher la mainmise furtive du Canada par le Partenariat nord-américain de sécurité et de prospérité, et qu’ils feront lumière sur ce programme, qui est motivé par des intérêts corporatifs. « C’est une façon de céder le contrôle du Canada à l’administration républicaine des Etats-Unis et aux plus grandes corporations de l’Amérique du Nord », a dit le député Julian. « C’est exactement ce qui se passe avec l’entente sur le bois d’œuvre, avec la Commission canadienne du blé et avec toute une gamme d’autres secteurs. Stephen Harper suit l’exemple des libéraux de Paul Martin et il est prêt à céder n’importe quoi, pourvu que ça fasse plaisir à l’administration de George Bush. » Des ministres conservateurs actuels, d’anciens ministres libéraux, des responsables canadiens, mexicains, et américains, ainsi que des cadres supérieurs de corporations américaines et des représentants du militaire se sont tous réunis à l’Hôtel Fairmont Banff Springs du 12 au 14 septembre 2006. Ni le public, ni les médias n’ont été informés de la tenue de cette réunion. Jusqu’à présent, le gouvernement de Harper a refusé d’en parler. L’événement a été organisé par le Conseil canadien des chefs d'entreprises. Le Partenariat nord-américain de sécurité et de prospérité a été lancé en mars de 2005 à titre d’initiative trilatérale qui avait pour but d’accélérer l’intégration du Canada et du Mexique avec les États-Unis, en harmonisant 300 lois et règlements communs. Depuis que Paul Martin, Vicente Fox et George W. Bush ont conclu le Partenariat, les discussions sur l’intégration continentale sont devenues clandestines. « Par le biais du Partenariat nord-américain de sécurité et de prospérité, des cadres du monde des affaires et du gouvernement se réunissent secrètement. Ils subvertissent les règlements et augmentent la concurrence, ce qui nuit aux droits des travailleurs, aux salaires raisonnables et aux conditions de travail. Les travailleuses et travailleurs veulent savoir : mais où est donc passé la démocratie?” a lancé Teresa Healy. « Le North American Competitive Council (NACC), qui est composé de cadres supérieurs des plus grandes entreprises canadiennes, américaines et mexicaines, ont été sacrés conseillers exclusifs des départements gouvernementaux en ce qui concerne la mise en œuvre du Partenariat. Ils font la sourde oreille aux opinions du peuple », a déclaré Jean-Yves Lefort. « Ce que cela signifie pour le Canada, c’est que notre qualité de vie sera inférieure dans plusieurs domaines, tels que la sécurité alimentaire, la sécurité aérienne, les normes écologiques, les soins de santé et les droits des travailleurs. Ce plan imposera des normes inférieures à notre pays. La plupart des Canadiens trouveront cela inacceptable », a souligné le député Julian. Au cours des prochains mois, le NPD se battra pour que soient divulguées, en leur totalité, toutes les ententes conclues par le gouvernement de Harper. Nous soumettrons des demandes d’accès à l’information pour que les Canadiens soient conscients de ce qui est en jeu. - 30 - Pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez contacter : Gaby Senay, attachée de presse, 613-295-9228

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:56 am
    I wish Julian luck but it will take more then luck for him to get a straight answer. The agreements are sealed and doubtfully revealing them will change what has already taken place. No written agreement can be nullified by any government other then the Americans. It would be nice to see what parts of our soul was sold never the less.

    Bush had already told Martin & Harper "don't ask them, tell them". This was in regard to Canadians opposition to the proposed missile defence. Harper has taken the advice to heart like his predecessors. Unfortunatly he is not even telling us.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  2. by Yowzah
    Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:04 am
    Where can I get a hold of the list of participants?

    I'm especially interested in seeing where Ignatieff's supports stand on this issue.

  3. by sure
    Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:19 am
    You can see the full list of the participants there:<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060919&articleId=3274">http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060919&articleId=3274</a>

  4. by Wraun
    Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:34 am
    Well it's about time. I was really starting to wonder where the hell the NDP were. I don't think "answers" are really all that important here. What is important is to shine some light on the obvious effort to conceal the truth. Canadians need to be reminded of Paul Martin's "warnings" about of Harper's "hidden agenda". He was not wrong and now we are seeing it.
    The NDP is the only party in a position to make an impact BEFORE the next election.
    Forget about the Liberals, they started this mess and Iggy is NOT going to come riding in on a white stallion and save Canada. He will likely join the chorus of "fear mongerers" trying to dethrone Harper and steal what votes he can from the NDP. Hopefully Canadians have had enough of this Liberal/Conservative pendulation and elect an NDP majority government so that Canada can return to the business of being Canada.
    I'm not necessarily a big fan of Jack Layton's and I would eventually like to see a Green Government but right now, there is not time. We need to save Canada from the clutches of Uncle Sam and the NDP has the best chance of forming a government that is neither Lib or Con.

    ---
    Dear Abby, Dear Abby my fountain pen leaks, my wife hollers at me and the kids are all freaks

  5. Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:34 am
    It's a step in the right direction. I'm happy to see someone talking about it. If they actually take action to put a stop to it, I'll be doubly impressed.

    ---
    These days, if you are not confused, you are not thinking clearly. Mrs. Irene Peters

  6. Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:54 am
    Footprints, I'm with you on this. I am however very pleased to see it brought up in the House! CAP has been writing to all MP's and have never received a response from any, including NDP, so whatever has made them move, I'm glad. It is not the complete solution, but it is alot better than the silence we've had for so long. Let's support this guy to continue; perhaps if they know we are supporting the initiative, regardless of what party we support, they will pursue it.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  7. Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:00 am
    fyi my letter of support...<br />
    <br />
    Dear Mr. Julian<br />
    I would like to congratulate you for your taking a step towards an independant Canada. I was pleased to read this article posted on <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca">www.vivelecanada.ca</a><br />
    <br />
    "NDP's Peter Julian Fights for Full Disclosure of Agreements on NAU<br />
    Contributed by: sthompson<br />
    Today in the House of Commons<br />
    Mr. Peter Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster, NDP) :<br />
    Mr. Speaker, far from standing up for Canada, the Conservative government is waving the white flag of surrender."<br />
    <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20061004145044429">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20061004145044429</a><br />
    <br />
    You are to be encouraged by all Canadians who want to remain free, democratic and independant from the North American Union. Is it possible for you to encourage your fellow ND's to stand with you on our behalf? Canadian Action Party has been struggling for years, working outside the House to bring this matter to the attention of Canadians as well as MP's. Thus far not one has responded to our direct questions.<br />
    <br />
    Fence sitting is no longer acceptable. Neither the Liberals or Conservatives will save us from this ruin, due to the fact that they have both participated in the creation of this system. We ask that you not only go after the Conservatives on this issue, but demand that all MP's declare their participation in the process or their total and unacceptable ignorance of it.<br />
    <br />
    There are far too many deals, including but not limited to the SPP, Smart Border, anti-terrorism legislation, NAFTA, that have contributed to the path to our demise as a sovereign nation. Too many secret meetings and back-room deals for anyone to deny knowledge of the events. The fear-mongering into silence that has happened, since the anti-terrorism legislation of which Mr. Arar was victim and many others, was implemented on the false information growing from 911. CAP resolved at our 2006 Convention to demand a Royal Commission into the events of 911, based on the Canadians killed there and the many agreements which have been implemented based on it. Without a full independant inquiry we are left making laws, agreements and plans that may have been based on false information at best.<br />
    <br />
    We trust that you will not back down from this very serious issue. We want you to know that many Canadians are holding their breath waiting for the NDP to do what an opposition party should, and that is hold the government accountable. I cannot stress enough the number of Canadians who are living in fear of this NAU, especially with the new 'H.R.6166' Military Commissions Act threatening the U.S. and all who stand against their regime.<br />
    <br />
    There has never been a time since WWII that Canadians have felt so helpless and so without leadership and being denied information. The CBC denies their is a NAU plan, the assistant to Mr. Lauzon(MP) also denies there is an NAU. Canadians are tired of being lied to. We need you as elected MP's to take the bull by the horns and expose all complicit members, all traitorous activities before it is too late! We need to get our military out from under the empire builders. We need to stop sending them into a contaminated war zone, without a clear Canadian directive reflective of our values. Canada is counting on you. Please stop attacking the Liberals,or Conservatives en masse and attack the issue and all those responsible for it(please remember that many of the players are unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats). Your coveted seats will mean absolutely nothing if we do not have a country!<br />
    <br />
    I look forward to your positive response. I am cc'ing this to Jack Layton and others, in order to encourage strong support.<br />
    Thank you<br />
    Catherine Whelan Costen<br />
    Canadian Action Party President <p>---<br>If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  8. Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:40 am
    The trouble is that if the NDP did get elected into a so-called "majority" government (something it's almost never in terms of popular support), then it will simply do what all politicians do best - renege and do an about face screwing us over until the next election (repeat forever).

    Until there's accountability (as in it's a serious criminal offense for a politician to lie that's actually enforced), then we simply cannot believe anything the NDP say they'll do if elected.

    It makes absolutely no sense that governments have the legal authority to sell off anything that's owned by the people. The government is supposed to work for us, not us working for them, therefore they do not have the legal authority to sell off anything without the publics explicit consent.

    We can always null and void whatever secret deals were made after kicking out the traitors. Countries do it all the time - Russia under Putin did recently, and so did Venezuela under Chavez.

    Sure, the Americans will retaliate, but at least we'd be going down fighting rather than just "going down" on our hands and knees.

  9. Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:31 am
    I am not suggesting they need to form the government, I'm simply saying we need an opposition. Presently we do not have one acting in Parliament, the biggest opposition these guys have is CAP and we don't have a seat, nor media to help expose the facts.

    I agree we need laws written to hold our elected officials to be accountable to us, but first we need the electorate to stand together and take back our country. This one member has made a significant stand for all of us, it is better to help him and to encourage others to stand up now and maybe we can stop it. If all members knew that their seats were directly attached to us, instead of to the corporate bucks, they would be accountable to us. We have not demanded it from them, but the corporations have, and that is where we the people have failed. I can't imagine the electorate from the early 1900's standing by and taking this crap from elected officials. What happened to us? We need to get that back! Historically, minority governments are the most accountable to the people, and if they really felt we were holding them accountable it would work in our best interest today. But right now they think they are holding all the cards and we are nothing but the slaves. That must change. asap

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  10. Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:57 am
    Ignatieff imo is another sell out. Do some research into his past and you will see he is pro USA. Now whether or not he is pro NAU is another thing altogether, many Americans are dead set against it too, even though financially it benefits the US. <br />
    <br />
    One thing that every one should remember here is that all the implementation of these working group meetings is being done by bureaucrats behind the scenes, and dig a little to find out where our policies come from. A little hint: Not from our Government<br />
    <br />
    Think tanks produce much of Canadas policies and a lot of these thinks tanks subscribe to European and US centric reports. Since these think tanks get papers done by the European Union they try to use ideas that are being used there. Where do you think these stupid restrictions on our childrens ability to get a simple drivers license came from?<br />
    <br />
    If politicians do finally see what is going on, or are finally told by their constituents, we may see some action. After all these guys do keep busy despite what most people think and they do not have the time to do much delving into anything but reports the bureaucrats keep sending them. Contact your MPs I have.<br />
    <br />
    Currently my local MP is looking into the North American Investment Fund Act that was put through the US Senate at the end of June. I've been interested in it because it proposes that Canada and the US invest into it and I want to know where the money is going to come from.<br />
    <br />
    The amounts proposed for investment is a total of $200 Billion dollars over the course of 10 years, but not limited to 10 years. Canada would be responsible for putting up 10% of that money and the United States would invest 40% of the money needed. The rest of the money would be found thru private placements and Mexican government investments.<br />
    <br />
    This money would be diverted to the World Bank and they would give this money to Pemex, Mexicos state run oil monopoly. In turn Pemex would use the money to develop its oil reserves, the money resulting from higher oil sales would go to pay for Mexicos portion of the Nafta Superhighway and some schools.<br />
    <br />
    The thing is if canada wants to get into the oil business again why don't they spend the money at home rather than helping Mexico? I know here in B.C. there is a mandate to open up the Coast to offshore drilling and the government wants it to happen as an industry by 2010. Look into Hansards documents for the BC legislature if you're interested.<br />
    <br />
    Oh, one last thing before I go. Corridor development is happening big time in BC and almost going totally unnoticed, this is very much the same as NASCOs plans but on a much more regional basis. <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.nwcorridor.com/bc/princerupert.html">http://www.nwcorridor.com/bc/princerupert.html</a>

  11. by Wraun
    Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:21 pm
    Yes I agree that we need to encourage MP's like him. I immediately sent him a congratulatory e-mail after reading this story. Personally, I do think the NDP is our best bet for a new government. It problably won't happen but a real deviation from the norm is what this country needs. The above poster may very well be right that once in office, they'd be no different but all we can do is give them a chance. Besides, like I said above, the NDP, is the only party within striking distance. Cynicism won't help, that just discourages participation, breeds apathy and more cynicism. Voter apathy is the problem. Maybe NAU secrecy is the issue that will awaken the sleeping electorate and generate some voter turn out.

    ---
    Dear Abby, Dear Abby my fountain pen leaks, my wife hollers at me and the kids are all freaks

  12. Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:07 pm
    As an NDP member I've been bugging the Party and individuals for many months and even years, to start screaming from the rooftops about these secret deals and also wrote a number of columns on the subject, with another one going out tomorrow.

    The problem are the backroom policy makers of the NDP, both at the federal and provincial levels, the union and Party economists, brainwashed with the same neocon/neoclassical garbage as are those of the "ruling sector", who dare not say anything that may interfere with their screwed up dogmas.

    Plus, of course, the so called labour leaders, still hoping for a miracle from NAFTA. With people like Jack Munro, or Haggard, former "leaders" of the now defunct IWA,
    the NDP had and has no worse enemies, not to mention the "economists" of the CLC.

    The majority of unionists vote Reform, and hope for the elimination of the borders : "...so that we can go shopping for bargains". The "leaders" can't even persuade their own members to support the NDP.

    Economic sanity and politics can never mix, no matter who, or what the Parties preach.

    Ed Deak.

  13. Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:51 pm
    Ed wrote: "As an NDP member I've been bugging the Party and individuals for many months and even years, to start screaming from the rooftops about these secret deals and also wrote a number of columns on the subject, with another one going out tomorrow."

    I have been doing the same thing as the Financial Agent/Treasurer for an NDP constituency.

    Ed also wrote: "The problem are the backroom policy makers of the NDP, both at the federal and provincial levels, the union and Party economists, brainwashed with the same neocon/neoclassical garbage as are those of the "ruling sector", who dare not say anything that may interfere with their screwed up dogmas."

    Ed is very correct here, as well. I attended an NDP "communications" workshop before the 2004 federal election and was upset that the 'Republicrat' strategy of winning elections (reach out for the ambivalent thinkers that are in the middle of the pack that can be swayed if you feed them the same sound byte over and over) had obviously influenced their primary strategy. As everyone remembers, there was no foreign policy debate, no NAFTA debate and no environmental debate.

    As I told Catherine in an e-mail last week, the NDP Policy Convention just held had numerous policy resolutions against NAU. When I also talked to an NDP veteran who is on the federal policies council last week he assured me that they were carefully considering the suggestions. I can only think that Julian's press release is a harbinger of the NDP election platform.

    I am very happy about this, because I am seeking the federal NDP nomination for the Chilliwack-Fraser Canyon Riding. The reason I decided to go for it is because I wanted to make sure that the NAU is in the forefront of the campaign (as well as leaving Afghanistan, forming a Canadian Energy Policy, environmental concerns, social stability, and many other issues of concern to critical thinkers like here on vive). We'll see what happens.

    ---
    Michael

  14. Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:17 pm
    Or, you can get them in the original press release:<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060919132553106">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060919132553106</a><p>---<br>"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden<br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news