Wall Street Journal Reporter: Iraq Is Lost

Posted on Friday, October 01 at 10:51 by Action-Jackson
=====

09/30/2004

Being a foreign correspondent in Baghdad these days is like being under virtual house arrest. Forget about the reasons that lured me to this job: a chance to see the world, explore the exotic, meet new people in far away lands, discover their ways and tell stories that could make a difference.

Little by little, day-by-day, being based in Iraq has defied all those reasons. I am house bound. I leave when I have a very good reason to and a scheduled interview. I avoid going to people's homes and never walk in the streets. I can't go grocery shopping any more, can't eat in restaurants, can't strike a conversation with strangers, can't look for stories, can't drive in any thing but a full armored car, can't go to scenes of breaking news stories, can't be stuck in traffic, can't speak English outside, can't take a road trip, can't say I'm an American, can't linger at checkpoints, can't be curious about what people are saying, doing, feeling. And can't and can't.

There has been one too many close calls, including a car bomb so near our house that it blew out all the windows. So now my most pressing concern every day is not to write a kick-ass story but to stay alive and make sure our Iraqi employees stay alive. In Baghdad I am a security personnel first, a reporter second.

It's hard to pinpoint when the turning point exactly began. Was it April when the Fallujah fell out of the grasp of the Americans? Was it when Moqtada and Jish Mahdi declared war on the U.S. military? Was it when Sadr City, home to ten percent of Iraq's population, became a nightly battlefield for the Americans? Or was it when the insurgency began spreading from isolated pockets in the Sunni triangle to include most of Iraq?

Despite President Bush's rosy assessments, Iraq remains a disaster. If under Saddam it was a potential threat, under the Americans it has been transformed to imminent and active threat, a foreign policy failure bound to haunt the United States for decades to come.

Iraqis like to call this mess the situation. When asked how are things? they reply: the situation is very bad.

What they mean by situation is this: the Iraqi government doesn't control most Iraqi cities, there are several car bombs going off each day around the country killing and injuring scores of innocent people, the country's roads are becoming impassable and littered by hundreds of landmines and explosive devices aimed to kill American soldiers, there are assassinations, kidnappings and beheadings. The situation, basically, means a raging barbaric guerilla war.

In four days, 110 people died and over 300 got injured in Baghdad alone. The numbers are so shocking that the ministry of health, which was attempting an exercise of public transparency by releasing the numbers-- has now stopped disclosing them.

Insurgents now attack Americans 87 times a day.

A friend drove thru the Shiite slum of Sadr City yesterday. He said young men were openly placing improvised explosive devices into the ground. They melt a shallow hole into the asphalt, dig the explosive, cover it with dirt and put an old tire or plastic can over it to signal to the locals this is booby-trapped. He said on the main roads of Sadr City, there were a dozen landmines per every ten yards. His car snaked and swirled to avoid driving over them. Behind the walls sits an angry Iraqi ready to detonate them as soon as an American convoy gets near. This is in Shiite land, the population that was supposed to love America for liberating Iraq.

For journalists the significant turning point came with the wave of abduction and kidnappings. Only two weeks ago we felt safe around Baghdad because foreigners were being abducted on the roads and highways between towns. Then came a frantic phone call from a journalist female friend at 11 p.m. telling me two Italian women had been abducted from their homes in broad daylight. Then the two Americans, who got beheaded this week and the Brit, were abducted from their homes in a residential neighborhood. They were supplying the entire block with round the clock electricity from their generator to win friends. The abductors grabbed one of them at 6 a.m. when he came out to switch on the generator; his beheaded body was thrown back near the neighborhoods.

The insurgency, we are told, is rampant with no signs of calming down. If any thing, it is growing stronger, organized and more sophisticated every day. The various elements within it -- baathists, criminals, nationalists and Al Qaeda -- are cooperating and coordinating.

I went to an emergency meeting for foreign correspondents with the military and embassy to discuss the kidnappings. We were somberly told our fate would largely depend on where we were in the kidnapping chain once it was determined we were missing. Here is how it goes: criminal gangs grab you and sell you up to Baathists in Fallujah, who will in turn sell you to Al Qaeda. In turn, cash and weapons flow the other way from Al Qaeda to the Baathisst to the criminals. My friend Georges, the French journalist snatched on the road to Najaf, has been missing for a month with no word on release or whether he is still alive.

America's last hope for a quick exit? The Iraqi police and National Guard units we are spending billions of dollars to train. The cops are being murdered by the dozens every day -- over 700 to date -- and the insurgents are infiltrating their ranks. The problem is so serious that the U.S. military has allocated $6 million dollars to buy out 30,000 cops they just trained to get rid of them quietly.

As for reconstruction: firstly it's so unsafe for foreigners to operate that almost all projects have come to a halt. After two years, of the $18 billion Congress appropriated for Iraq reconstruction only about $1 billion or so has been spent and a chuck has now been reallocated for improving security, a sign of just how bad things are going here.

Oil dreams? Insurgents disrupt oil flow routinely as a result of sabotage and oil prices have hit record high of $49 a barrel.

Who did this war exactly benefit? Was it worth it? Are we safer because Saddam is holed up and Al Qaeda is running around in Iraq?

Iraqis say that thanks to America they got freedom in exchange for insecurity. Guess what? They say they'd take security over freedom any day, even if it means having a dictator ruler.

I heard an educated Iraqi say today that if Saddam Hussein were allowed to run for elections he would get the majority of the vote. This is truly sad.

Then I went to see an Iraqi scholar this week to talk to him about elections here. He has been trying to educate the public on the importance of voting. He said, "President Bush wanted to turn Iraq into a democracy that would be an example for the Middle East. Forget about democracy, forget about being a model for the region, we have to salvage Iraq before all is lost."

One could argue that Iraq is already lost beyond salvation. For those of us on the ground it's hard to imagine what if any thing could salvage it from its violent downward spiral.

The genie of terrorism, chaos and mayhem has been unleashed onto this country as a result of American mistakes and it can't be put back into a bottle.

The Iraqi government is talking about having elections in three months while half of the country remains a no go zone -- out of the hands of the government and the Americans and out of reach of journalists. In the other half, the disenchanted population is too terrified to show up at polling stations. The Sunnis have already said they'd boycott elections, leaving the stage open for polarized government of Kurds and Shiites that will not be deemed as legitimate and will most certainly lead to civil war.

I asked a 28-year-old engineer if he and his family would participate in the Iraqi elections since it was the first time Iraqis could to some degree elect a leadership. His response summed it all: "Go and vote and risk being blown into pieces or followed by the insurgents and murdered for cooperating with the Americans? For what? To practice democracy? Are you joking?"

-- Farnaz Fassihi, Wall Street Journal

More on this topic



Note: More on this topic

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Oct 01, 2004 7:45 pm
    Another 'journalist' who can't see beyond the end of his own nose. The interim government and the Americans are trying to hold elections in order to let the people decide who should govern Iraq. The 'insurgents' or whatever you want to call them are attacking the government for this reason, they don't want Iraqis to decide for themselves how they should live, they want to tell Iraqis how to live and if they don't do it their way then off with their heads.

    It's obvious who the bad guys are here and it's not the Americans, it is the savages who butcher children with suicide bombs and cut off people's heads with knives. It would serve some Iraqis right if those same people were allowed to govern the country, but that is unfair to the vast majority of Iraqis, especially after what they went through with Saddam in charge.

  2. Fri Oct 01, 2004 9:14 pm
    Of course this "on the ground" reporter does not understand what is happening. It would be much better if he/she was embedded at the oil terminal and redistributed the official party "Pravda" perspective. And the monthly casualty stats are entirely fabricated by people with vested interests.

    And also the "bad guys" have absolutely no reason to be upset after all this time without the basic power/water/sanitation or jobs, their land has been made a waste land of Depleted Uranium (DU) leftover and their oil terminals the most carefully guarded part of Iraq.

    Did they not give plenty of chance for the rebuild to occur? Is that possible that some people forgot to plan what to do after the shock&awe and that it is the reason why Iraqi is lost and Bush-I never went in? It certainly is hard to acknowledge during elections time.

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  3. Sat Oct 02, 2004 3:02 am
    Thank you, Gaulois, my sentiments, exactly. It occured to me as I was reading this article, that the Iraqis are fighting back with everything they got for their freedom. Suppose someone came to America and toppled Bush, with military might, put him on the run, took over the White House, turned the Pentagon into a prison for dissident Americans, put up road blocks all over, ramdonly shot women and children, called everyone and insurgent, went on a search for WMD and found the motherlode, put out a hit list for Bush's cabinet members, reward dead or alive, imprisoned all Congressmen, began loading out all gold and oil, bombed every square inch, reduced everyone to groveling poverty,....need I say more? O-o.. say can you say........
    democracy?

  4. Sat Oct 02, 2004 2:27 pm
    How bad do your eyes have to be to see that the Iraqis are defending thier country against an unbelievably powerful agressor? THEY are not in AMERICA. THEY have attacked nobody. THEY are watching their nation being systematically destroyed so that BUSH and his oil-company & weapon producer friends can become rich.

    Iraqis know that Sadam Hussien was perhaps the biggest deterrent to terrorism in the Middle East. Bin-Laden feared him greatly even while the Americans continued to supply Al-Queda with weapons and training.

    Iraqis insurgents are perhaps the most noble of fighters due to the futility of thier battle.

    From Canada, I apologise with all of my heart to the Iraqis for the horror being caused you by our nearest neighbours.

    I apologise for the weakness of the United Nations and their inability to stand up to the United States (just like the League of Nations failed with Hitler).

    I apologise to you for my country's failure to do more than just "refusing to help America" in the unprovoked and criminal invasion of your nation (although we are paying greatly for that refusal).

    Please know this however; Americans really ARE wonderful, caring, loving people. I know this, I visit America regularly. Thier government controls their news and has lied to them so completely that they believe that they are helping you. As absurd as that sounds, it is the truth.

    The poor deluded American people truly believe that by taking over all oil-producing nations, by re-planting the opium crops in Afghanistan, by crushing democracy in every Latin-American nation and by placing nuclear weapons platforms in space, they will make the world a safer place.

    And they are not kidding.

  5. Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:15 am
    I think that's about right. Really fun loving people, Americans, just a little brainwashed is all.

  6. Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:19 am
    Thank you, Anonymous, for your comments, which I entirely agree with, and your generous words about Americans, which were kind, though exaggerated, in a typically Canadian sort of way.

    Yes, we really do believe all that crap about being the "free-est", the best, the "most good", blah blah...and God save anyone who disagrees. We really do want - above all else - to have all the world agree with our self-image of ourselves. We get really, really angry when they don't (we'll even take their name off our fried potatoes!).

    Here's the thing about Americans: it's just like our tv shows and our politics. It's about style over substance. America is one big show! "the Greatest Show on Earth!". But we've become an empty shell. We've become like our CrispyCream donuts: incredible to look at, and EVERYONE wants a taste...but of no nutritional value and very unhealthy to get too much of.

    It's not that our values and our founding principles are not wonderful. It is just that we don't practice them anymore.

    Now...back to the show!
    -Randy from RI

  7. by hoopoe
    Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:11 am
    Actually, the majority of the Iraqi people made their choice clear after the first Iraq invasion when Bush-I stopped up short and then called on the Iraqi people to rise up against Saddam. Unfortunately, the people who answered the call wanted a Shiite Islamic government so the American military was given orders to stand by and watch Saddam slaughter them from the sky. I don't know what criteria you're using here to judge who the "bad guys" are but from where I sit such treachery as committed by the US at that time rates high on the list of such criteria.

    Then again, the history of America's involvement in this region is full of treachery, starting with the CIA directed overthrow of a fledgling democracy in Iran in the 1950s not to mention the total lack of interest in the well-being of the common people throughout the middle east (and around the globe) as they supported dictator after dictator. Your belief that your government has any interest in promoting democracy anywhere can only be the result of ignorance of your country's own history in these matters; likely as a consequence of a fear of uncovering the truth about the atrocities of the American government committed in your name. It may be a human trait not to want to look at such things that tear down cherished beliefs of your country but such practiced ignorance does not help matters.

    It seems to me that this journalist doesn't have to see much beyond her nose because if you would read the article she is in the middle of Baghdad. Perhaps you could go there and give us a more accurate account?

  8. Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:05 am
    Okay, this WSJ reporter is out of it. First of all the WSJ were the ones, if I recall, who have been touting this yahoo Bush fellow all along and his Halliburton cronies. In other words, where was the WSJ when this mess started and why weren't they condemning this action from the get go. Does it take one reporter to get to Baghdad to figure out 'oh this is a mess?' Give me a break. And what does she mean the 'bad guys' aren't Americans? I'm an American here and I would say, yes, in this situation WE ARE the bad guys as we're the ones who invaded that country to begin with and turned it completely upside down. This reporter may be reporting 'the news' but the corporation she works for has been completely irresponsible when it comes to Bush. And anyone who says the Americans aren't the bad guys hasn't taken a look at the big picture.

  9. Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:04 am
    Anon, I don't understand what your point is. Yes, the corporate Wall Street Journal is corrupt and tows the Bushites line. What's your point? The above article wasn't published for just that reason.

    It is the author making a candid report on the going-ons in Iraq. The corporate elite wish to cover it up. And it got leaked, which is why we're reading it on an alternative news site such as this.

    You know, I remember reading Gwynn Dyers' assessment of Iraq before the US invaded. And, although his timeline was a little off, every prediction that comes to mind has come to fruition. The US is in deep doo-doo over there. They have, in every way, lost the war. And for good reason - it was un-win-able from the start. Do a google on Gwynn Dyers and Iraq and read his pre-invasion assessment.

    -KY

    ---
    Kory Yamashita

    "What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." - Oliver Wendell Holmes



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news