Is Canada's Elite At War With Citizens?

Posted on Saturday, November 27 at 14:52 by sthompson
It is a stunning disconnect. The tensions implied by this profound clash of values and goals are playing themselves out in many ways but perhaps the most important implications go to the question of democracy. An elite so fundamentally out of touch with the citizenry and so determined to see its annexationist agenda implemented, has no choice but to thwart the democratic will of the vast majority of Canadians. It is scarcely and exaggeration to say that this disconnect represents a crisis of our modern democracy.

Learning to love the 'hyper-power'

In this elite call-to-surrender we have good cops and bad cops. The so-called Calgary School, which includes Stephen Harper's eminence gris, Thomas Flanagan, are so hostile to everything Canadian they seem barely willing to leave the confines of their bunker at the University of Calgary. But even the good cops, like Allan Gotlieb, refer to any independent foreign policy based on Canadians' values as "romanticism."

In his embrace of real politic Gotlieb rejects any criticism of the new U.S. "hyper-power" - such as distancing ourselves from the invasion of Iraq. In a speech for the C.D. Howe Institute, he asked whether the Martin government "? can design a foreign policy that is less overreaching, less narcissistic, less sanctimonious..." This is how the former ambassador to the U.S. sees an independent, principles-based foreign policy. "Canadians who argue that the way to affect U.S. behaviour is through trying to constrain Washington with new rules of law," says Gotlieb, "are romantics, not realists."

But ask Canadians what they think and you really do get the sense that we are talking about two different countries. Almost 80 percent of Canadians believe the U.S. behaves like a "rogue nation" according to a poll reported by CanWest media. In stark contrast to the US and its culture of fear, Canadians see AIDS and SARS, and global warming as the two top threats to their interests - ahead of terrorism. Three quarters of those polled think we should play an active role in the world - not a passive rubber stamp for every adventure George Bush dreams up.

Delusions of influence

Half of Canadians polled believe that the U.S. cannot be trusted to treat Canada fairly. Contrast this with the view expressed by Gotlieb, that by currying favour with the U.S. we will have influence on them: "Our potential for influencing the world's greatest power is our comparative advantage in the world. It gives us credibility in other capitals." This declaration verges on the delusional, as Britain's Tony Blair has learned. When asked, post-speech, what Britain gained by backing Bush, Gotlieb replied that the benefits to Britain were "subtle." Indeed. Just how playing the role of U.S. sycophant will gain us credibility in a world almost universally appalled by the Bush agenda is left unexplained.

This chasm between Canadians and the political and economic elite who claim to speak for them is nothing new. The Ekos polling group has for years tracked the values gap. Looking at over 22 possible roles for government, the elite ("decision-makers") place the Canadian public's highest priorities - equality, social justice, collective rights, full employment, even privacy - at the bottom of their list.

Spooked elite

Until now this new normal for elite attitudes has gone largely unnoticed. But, as the song says, the trouble with normal is it always gets worse. The reign of George Bush has spooked the elite and accelerated their plans for our further assimilation into the U.S., and has brought forth Canadians' values in ways that have not been seen for decades. It is as if we had taken our values for granted until George Bush reminded us just what we stood for.

Yet Canadians may not realize that among CEOs, business think tanks, media corporations like CanWest, and both the Liberal and Conservative parties, this resurgence of Canadians' progressive values is not seen as something to celebrate. It is seen a crisis to be dealt with. Unless Canadians insist loudly that their values and priorities guide public policy, the "decision-makers" will again find a way to thwart their vision.

Author and journalist Murray Dobbin's 'State of the Nation' column will appear twice monthly on The Tyee.

Original: Is Canada's Elite at War with Citizens?

Note: Is Canada's Elite at Wa... Is Canada's Elite at Wa...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:25 pm
    No. But this author wants a war with CANADIANS whose vision is different than his own. The people he represents say they have different, supposedly better values, than the people who support democratization in Iraq for example.

    Just what would those values be though? Not peace - Saddam brutalized his population and attacked two neighbouring countries. Not a government representative of the people - Saddam was a dictator. Not human rights - Saddam violated those without a second thought.

    So just what are the values represented by this author? Can he not articulate a clear set of values AND the method by which they could reasonably be achieved?

    If his reply is multilateralism and 'good faith' negotiations with brutal dictators, then he's stunningly naive.

  2. Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:32 pm
    Yes, this is exactly it- a class warfare by the so-called 'elites' upon what`s left of the middle class, the working poor, and the ultra-poor. And Gottleib no doubt is one of those sellout elites! I mean, really, the only way for Canada to find respect and credibility on the world stage is for Canada to forge its own altruistic foreign and domestic policies! It wouldn`t hurt that we build up our military so that we`re able to defend ourselves! Canada has been America`s 'best friend' for how many decades now, but what special favour has this given us? That`s right- NONE! To rely on a bully for favour or protection ultimately means that you are subject to the whims and moods of the bully! This Gottleib guy is on glue!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  3. Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:38 pm
    Um, actually, if you read the article carefully, you`d be able to find that the values spoken of here are that of a country that not only takes care of its own, with programs like public health care, but also, tries to forge its own foreign policy separate from Washington`s warmongering imperialism. Something more in line with the Pearson- Trudeau foreign policy of trying to drum up support for peace, and mutual understanding. Nothing naive here. No point in trying to sway Washington. So, its time for a divorce! Time to make new, strong, friendships, with fair trade agreements.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  4. Sun Nov 28, 2004 12:26 am
    What they hell does Saddam have to do with any of this? This sadly is always trotted out by the sheep as some kind of slant against the realists on the left. I never have seen anyone condone Saddam or his behaviour. Strangly enough, the sheep seem to forget it was their own neocon heros that put Saddam in power, gave him money, weapons and support in the first place. But that is just the point, some Canadians and many Americans live in la la land. Reality, truth and fact mean nothing anymore. That extends from the elite right down to the useful idiot cheering squads.

  5. Sun Nov 28, 2004 12:46 am
    Divorce !!

    I've been through 2 of them, and it makes you stronger.

    Get with the program, divorce the USA shit-disturbing government and let's get on with our lives.

    Take all those whiners that want closer ties to the US, including tom dumb'quino and his batch of slaves, and we can go forward.


    ---
    "Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan

  6. Sun Nov 28, 2004 12:55 am
    The unfortunate reality is that the allegiance of the 'elite', and those who wish to be part of it, is more to power, privilege and ideology which supports their having the same than it is to their 'nation', whether that nation be the U.S., Canada or other. Any allegiance felt towards the nation is to one which maintains their rather self-serving ideological beliefs, rather than to a nation that serves the good of the many, both current and future.

    Elites have always been in unspoken war with the majority, the only difference here being, as the author indicates, that few have seemed so ready to sell their own nation down the river as currently seems the case in Canada.

    Of course, the same can be said for the U.S..

    ---
    "When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).

  7. Sun Nov 28, 2004 1:17 am
    Another socialist heard from. If Canada were run the way people like Dobbin want it to be, there would be real and rapid brain drain to the south. And there is no such thing as "collective rights". The very concept is a sick corruption of liberalism. Only individuals have rights.

    The irony is that the very thing leftists like Dobbin hate most, corporations, are a result of what happens when you give groups or abstract entities an identity and rights equivalent to those of an individual human being.

  8. Sun Nov 28, 2004 1:54 am
    I always love it when the American's reply annonymously. Maybe they should be called the Anonicans.
    I totally agree with Dobbin.
    We have NAFTA, a "trade" agreement, as long as it favours the larger trading partner. Otherwise they ILLEGALLY ignore WTO rulings. Northcom, the new U.S. lead military protectionism idea to keep all hostiles away. Perhaps if you used the Golden Rule, there wouldn't be hostiles. And, don't aargue that we neeeeeed Northcom, because Canada isn't pissing anyone off. The business and political elite are selling off Canada at an alarming rate. Step back and look at what is happening. We are a "have" country in terms of resources, and the U.S. is a "need" country for them. So, rather than do something alarming like taking us over with military force, we are being pieced off, bought up and pillaged. Any Canadian can see it.

    ---
    Darren Olson
    --
    "We shall be Canadians first, foremost, and always, and our policies will be decided in Canada and not dictated by any other country." - Diefe

  9. by Wraun
    Sun Nov 28, 2004 3:28 am
    Yes exactly. The Americans decided a long time ago, when they failed to take Canada by force, that they'd have to take it bit by bit. Now in the post-nineties boom the "elites" want that incredible wealth they have seen and gotten a piece of during the nineties and they're willing to sacrifice their principles and their country for it. What they don't seem to realize is that America's wealth and financial power is dwindling and it won't be long before the empire falls. If Canada's elite has their way, we will fall with them. If we stand our ground now, it may hurt in the short term but Canada would likely emerge as an economic powerplant in the "post-american" world.

    ---
    Canada for Canadians

  10. Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:06 am
    In Canada we live under the umbrella of U.S. military protection. History tells us that nations like Canada with a high quality of life and low birth rate end up being invaded. So what is keeping this from happening in Canada? Living inside of the American playground, we benefit from their protection; therefore we can spend less on our military and more on our social programs. To me it seems like these elitists just value social welfare more than sovereignty, which makes you wonder: are they as bad as we are making them out to be?

  11. Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:23 am
    I do SOOOO look forward to the non sequitorial, red herring musings of our non resident master-baiter!


    Why any of you take the bait of this fool is beyond me.

    By allowing this goader to provoke a response is to waste valuable thought while he gets to get his rocks off.

  12. by Wraun
    Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:53 am
    The umbrella of american military protection? Protection from what? The only threat that I can see to Canada is america. If Canada were to cut all ties to the u.s., would Al Qaeda attack us? Not likely. Furthermore, if Canada were on it's own militarily (and still weak) and any nation (or group of nations) other than the u.s. attacked us for any reason, we'd have help from all those other nations that we've helped in the past. Canada is still respected around the world and the only way to stop the degradation of that respect is to distance ourselves from the u.s.a.. Oh ya, and get a real leader.

    ---
    Canada for Canadians

  13. Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:53 am
    Yes anon, their administration is.

    A superpower has no "friends," it has interests. We are a tool, and unless we do what they want, we will be a target, and be bullied regardless of what we do, unless we stand up to them.

    Also, who is the U.S. protectiong us from? Everyone but themselves. Any rational person knows it would be stupid for another country to invade Canada, as the U.S. is the world policeman.

    Good on Glotlieb for the Orwellian nonsense anyway.....I wonder if he actually believes this....some people really do you know.....

  14. Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:55 am
    As for country's with low birth rates and high standrds of living being invaded, what about Switzerland, (neutral during world wars) Sweden and Norway?


    Made you look.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news