Bill Blaikie On Lockheed Martin

Posted on Thursday, October 30 at 14:53 by sthompson
Bill Blaikie pressures government on Lockheed Martin

Government Contracts
Thursday October 9, 2003

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Industry.

We have heard a troubling rumour that Statistics Canada has awarded a multi-million dollar contract to an American corporation to do the dress rehearsal for the census in 2005 and subsequently the census itself. That corporation, we have heard, is Lockheed Martin, one of the biggest munitions companies in the world.

I wonder if the minister could tell us whether or not this is in fact true and, if it is true, why the Liberal government has decided to award such a contract.

Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Industry, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, one thing I can assure the House is that Statistics Canada will continue to do its job according to the worldclass standards that it has always achieved. We will make certain of that. It has a well deserved reputation for excellence and it will continue to work to deserve that reputation.

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, let the House take note that the Minister of Industry did not answer my question and did not deny that such a contract has been offered.

Given that this is an American munitions corporation that is actually all wound up with the star wars thing, I wonder if the minister could explain to us the connection between star wars and Statistics Canada and tell us whether or not the government is involved in the letting of a contract of this kind to an American corporation. Would he answer the question? Surely he knows what is going on in his own department.

Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Industry, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is working himself into an agitated state when he should focus instead on the real purpose of all this, which is to make sure we get statistics numbers and a census that we can rely upon. Statistics Canada will continue to do what is necessary to achieve just that.

Bill rose again in the same question period on this.

Thursday October 9, 2003
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, my question is again to the Minister of Industry. I will allow for the fact that perhaps his first answer to my question might have been based on not knowing what the situation was. Some time has passed. Could the minister tell us whether or not such a contract has been awarded to Lockheed-Martin for the census. If it has, could he tell us in which wing of the Pentagon all this information on Canadians will be stored? Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Industry, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, as with any other such crown agency, contracts awarded by Statistics Canada are awarded after a full bidding process where value for money and the contract price is evaluated.

I have every confidence Statistics Canada used that process in its entirety in this and every other case

Government Contracts
Friday October 10, 2003

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, I want to re-engage the Minister of Industry with respect to the contract given to Lockheed Martin for the Canadian census.

Yesterday the minister said on the way out of the House that the trade agreements made him do it. He knows that the trade agreements did no such thing. The trade agreements do not force the government to contract out the census to anyone.

I want to ask him why he is hiding behind the trade agreements. While he is at it, if he takes the trade agreements so seriously, can he tell us why the government does not take arms control treaties seriously enough that it is participating in star wars and negotiating with the Americans over NMD? If it took those treaties seriously--

The Deputy Speaker: The hon. Minister of Public Works and Government Services.

Hon. Ralph Goodale (Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, contrary to what the hon. gentleman has just said, the project in question does indeed fall subject to the rules of the NAFTA and the WTO. Industry participation, according to the rules of the trade agreement, were sought by a letter of interest.

The RFP was published on the Merx system from September 4, 2002 to the closing date of November 4, 2002. Proposals were received. The proposal from Lockheed Martin was judged to be the best of those proposals at the best price. It was indeed adjudicated by an independent third party.

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the trade agreements do not force the government to put out an RFP in the first place. This is something that could be done by the government, by Statistics Canada. There is no need to contract it out in the first place and the trade agreement does not force the government to do that.

I want to ask the minister in charge, does he not think that the knowledge by Canadians that this is going to be done by a big American multinational will cause them concerns about confidentiality and about privacy? Does he not expect that there will be a lot less compliance with the census than there has been in the past? Given the mistake that the government is about to make, will it rescind this contract immediately?

Hon. Ralph Goodale (Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, there are in fact stringent provisions in the contract to ensure that the security of Canadians is properly respected and that the whole process with respect to the census is conducted with complete integrity.

Government Contracts
Friday October 24, 2003

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, it seems odd that some of those who support the new Liberal leader complain when a crown corporation gets money to do something that is long overdue in this country, but they are silent about the awarding of a contract to Lockheed Martin to do the census or for that matter, the contract that was awarded to Lockheed Martin to do health information services for our Canadian armed forces.

Has the Deputy Prime Minister had a chance to look at the Lockheed Martin file? Can he tell the House today that this contract will be rescinded and the census will be done in Canada, by Canadians, where it belongs?

Hon. Andy Mitchell (Secretary of State (Rural Development) (Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario), Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the reality is that it is a Canadian subsidiary that will be conducting the census. The information will be maintained in Canada. It will be conducted in Canada. It will be a Canadian enterprise that provides a valuable service to Canadians, which we have always done in terms of the census.

Government Contracts
Wednesday October 29, 2003

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, Canadians do not need more information, if they are up to their you know what in alligators. They do not want the Liberals counting the alligators. They want them to do something about it.

I have a question is for the Minister of Public Works and it has to do with the awarding of the census contract to Lockheed Martin.

I have information from a competitor of Lougheed Martin that it received this contract, not through due process, but sometime after the RFP had been initiated and others had gone through the process. However, Lougheed Martin showed up at the end and received the contract.

Could the Minister of Public Works undertake to look into this and report back to the House as to why that American corporation received favourable treatment in that way?

Hon. Ralph Goodale (Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the information that the hon. gentleman has just described is certainly at odds with the information I have. He has asked me if I will look into what he has suggested. I certainly will do that, and I will get back to him if there is anything further to report.

Note: www.billblaikie.ca

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Oct 31, 2003 12:04 am
    Keep up the good fight Mr Blaikie!<p> <p>---<br>"History does nor repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  2. by N Say
    Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:19 am
    Woooooooo! Go Bill!

    ---
    "So many right-wing christians, so few lions." - t-shirt I saw @ school

  3. Fri Oct 31, 2003 2:02 am
    I went to his website, and the contact to send him encouragement to keep up the fight and thank him, but the message got scrambled! Not sure why, but if anyone has the current email address for him, I\'ll try again.

  4. Fri Oct 31, 2003 2:36 am
    Try bill@billblaikie.ca. Oddly enough his office was the only one (aside from the form letter sent to those who responded from this site) to acknowledge my e-mail to them. I also sent e-mail to the PMO, Paul Martin, the Alliance and the PCs.

    I only wrote to thank Bill, I asked the others some rather pointed questions about where they stood on this issue. Draw your own conclusions.

  5. Fri Oct 31, 2003 4:32 am
    Yeah, well Bill is just such a responsive guy! You can say what you like - i.e. that he\'s an resoundingly misinformed, opportunistic, say-anything-but-don\'t-let-the-facts-get-in-the-way-of-a-good-rabid-Yank bashing-sound bite; and, all-round,rhetoric-spewing wind-bag.

    But hey, he is sure responsive!!!

  6. Fri Oct 31, 2003 5:30 am
    Tom D\'Aquino, get a f**king life.

  7. Fri Oct 31, 2003 5:32 am
    How is he mis-informed? You\'re not equating Bill Blaikie with the neo-cons, who actually are full of rhetoric, without any facts to back them up.......

  8. Fri Oct 31, 2003 5:34 am
    \"But hey, he sure is responsive!\"

    -Diane Francis, Ameri-con Post.

  9. Fri Oct 31, 2003 5:52 am
    Those are pretty sad attempts at a debate! If someone other than Mr.Blaikie made an attempt to communicate, we might have some substance to this argument. So far the rest are non-responsive. Being as how we pay their wages they really ought to answer our questions so we can all but the rhetoric to bed, we are only seeking fact. So far the facts are not in favor of Mr. Rock or the decision to hire an American Based company to invade Canadians privacy! That is a pro-Canadian point of view! Just because we want the census done by Canadians, for Canadians and securely remaining under Canadian law, doesn\'t mean we are bashing the U.S. You don\'t have bash one thing to stand for something else, especially when that \'for\' is your own Country.

  10. Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:08 pm
    After reading that scintillating exchange I can see why there may be some confusion about what is going on. Bill Blakie touched on what may turn out to be the pivotal question, namely what was the reason the development of Census applications went outside StatsCan in the first place?

    Mr. Fellegi\'s reply to Mr. Hurtig spoke at length about the unavailability of tried and true methods and the need to provide internet based access and went on and on about complexity, but at no point did he ever deign to provide a reason for all these supposed needs. No one has ever said the old methods were inadequate; is Mr. Fellegi wanting the Canadian public to assume that previous Censuses (Censi?) were inadequate because they were not done with some internet input?

    I am glad that the exchange in the house has been published here. It provides an interesting look at the level of involvement the Minister for Industry has within StatsCan..



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news