I could dwell on the difficulty of anyone's improving relations with a man of Mr. Bush's remarkably unpleasant character. After all, Canada has produced no more affable or charming politician than former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, and Mr. Chrétien it seems could not entirely disguise a sense of repulsion at the American commander in chief. I am sure he did not greatly miss his cancelled invitation to share charred cow, root beer, and sermons from the Book of Revelations down in Crawford, Texas.
Of course, no matter how unpleasant the current president is, Canada must have a decent relationship with America. Geography dictates this, but so does Canada's basic national character. Canada does not make enemies, which is why so many Americans travelling in Europe and other places wear maple leaf patches or pins on their backpacks or lapels.
Criticism of Manley's scheme is possible on many levels, but my chief criticism is that the authors simply do not understand that no country can make a binding deal of this nature with the United States. It is simply impossible. Yes, America's government might well sign an agreement, but the agreement would shortly prove worthless, except those portions of it with visceral appeal to Americans. This conclusion comes neither from prejudice nor mordant humor but from having lived half my life in each country and being a serious student of history.
The point of the scheme is to avoid the massive back-ups in trade and travel that occurred in the aftermath of 9/11 by creating what would be effectively a single border for the countries of North America. Canada and Mexico would give up their independent decision-making regarding circumstances of entry, including for refugees, an area of international affairs where Canada in past decades has been far more generous and humane than the United States. There is even provision for educational efforts to promote a sense of North American identity.
Full article:
http://scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0503/S00184.htm
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 23, 2005]
---
Dave Ruston
---
Dave Ruston
That pretty much says it all for me!
---
When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp
We Canadians are not much better, but emulating them has got to be a sickness. When are we going to wake up? No, I do not have the solution or the answers, but I know I do not want to be like them. Actually I want to erect giant mirrors along the 49th parallel that reflects back to them their image.
---
rhondda
ViveLe Canada...is either (a) simply a reporting of the
bad news of Canada is losing the sovereignty 'battle' to
the USA, and (b) wailing and bemoaning, like your post,
of how bad things are and why you don't want to be
more "American'. None that "reaction" is particularly
helpful--it is however, the historical response of the 'old
left' in Canada...hell bent on always 'reacting' to their
agenda, their program, their policies, ....and rarely, have
the creativity, courage, vision, to articulate an alternative
positive vision for Canada. With few exceptions, most of
the articles and postings on this site, are all 'old left' of
'centre left' reactions ...very rebellious, angry and
reactionary ..against what 'they' in corporate canada
are doing...but where are the 'alternatives' . Aside from
dialogues does this site do anything to facilitate action
of any sort--does anyone know? --or are we just
referred to the Council of Canadians and more
blarney---I have been receiving from COC--the same
bulletin on 'Canada's water for sale' for over two years
now...perhaps three...really/ it goes straight into 'file 13'.
Oh by the way I am mentally ill,but not as ill as the politicians and corporate bums.
---
Dave Ruston
---
rhondda