Ignatieff Targeted Over Early Terror Writings

How can Iggy have 30% support? This guy is trying to change history with respects to everything he has written.

If Iggy wins the next federal election will be the Clash of the Necons.

You can read Ignatieff's own words and judge his views for yourself: <br><br> <a>"Lesser Evils" by Michael Ignatieff</a>

Sorry, here's the fixed link. <br><br> <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php?story=20061004212736647&query=Ignatieff">"Lesser Evils" by Michael Ignatieff</a> <br><br> If a moderator can fix the previous link, please do so and remove this one. Thanks!

Sorry man, no one can edit posts in the regular sections.

---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

Anyone who has read some of his writings and they are not all that early (unless you would class things written in 2004 as his "early" writings)will find that they can be used as a justification of torture simply by re-defining what is meant by the term and applying "coercive interrogation" to the remaining harsh interrogation methods. In other words, torture under another name is no longer torture.

This is exactly the kind of reasoning that has been used by neo-conservatives to change the meanings of many traditional terms. Ignatieff has engaged in a form of verbal gymnastics. Early writings give a good clue as to how a leader will perform in office. After studying Stephen Harper's early writings virtually nothing he has done so far is a surprise.

Ignatieff writings make it easy to class him as an American imperialist. Like Paul Martin, a corporate globalist who seemed indecisive because he could not find a way to make that ideology acceptable to the electorate, Ignatieff often puts his foot in his mouth by trying to make his ideology politically palatable.

"How can Iggy have 30% support? This guy is trying to change history with respects to everything he has written."

Funny, I yelled out the same thing just this morning after hearing it said on CBC radio.

My wife seeing me turn a little red with anger, calmy asked me what I always ask her when she gets emotional after hearing a news item:

"How do you know it's true?"

Indeed!

Does anyone know for sure how these creeps are selected? How can anyone as a party member seriously consider selecting Iggy???

For all we know Iggy is on the losing end of the stick. I sure hope so, although he may "win" anyway.

You sure this guy wasn't separated from John Kerry at birth? His writing is typical self-serving fear mongering political propaganda. Basically, anyway you slice it, Canada, as we know it, is screwed.