Can-US Refugee Harmonization Agreement Causes Rush On Border

Posted on Wednesday, December 29 at 06:56 by sthompson
Full CBC article: Refugee claimants rush to beat deadline

More info: Full final text of the Safe Third Country Agreement

Excerpts from links provided in opening paragraph:

From Kairos Canada.org:

Despite wide reaching resistance in Canada and south of our border, the Canada-U.S. “safe third country” agreement has been scheduled for implementation on December 29, 2004. After this date, Canada will deny entry to refugee claimants who arrive via the U.S., and vice versa. Both governments argue that there is no need to offer a refugee hearing to asylum seekers who could have made their claim in a “safe” third country.

The problem with this argument is that the U.S. is not safe for many refugees. The U.S. detains asylum seekers more frequently than Canada, is more openly discriminatory in its treatment of Muslims and Arabs, and is less sympathetic to gender-based asylum claims. The December implementation date falls at a particularly bad time for refugees, with U.S. policy makers focused on security concerns and enforcement measures. An intelligence bill negotiated in early December would double the number of border agents and substantially increase the size of immigration detention centres over the next five years. It is expected that asylum reform will be prominent on the U.S. legislative agenda in 2005, and that legislative changes will reflect an analysis linking refugees and terrorism. In this context, refugees face an increasingly uncertain future in the U.S.

Despite legislators’ focus on security issues, refugee advocates are concerned that the Safe Third Country Agreement will actually make the border less secure, pushing refugees to look for irregular ways of entering Canada, where they expect better treatment and a more sympathetic hearing. There is a strong potential for increased smuggling activity, exposing refugees to physical danger and economic exploitation.

Full article: Safe Third Country Agreement

From Human Rights First.org
Excerpt:

NEW YORK – The U.S. will likely sign Thursday a “Safe Third Country” Agreement with Canada that will force refugees who want to seek asylum in Canada to file their applications in the United States if they stop in the U.S. on their way to Canada. It will also force U.S.-bound refugees who stop first in Canada to apply there. The Agreement will force thousands of asylum seekers to apply for asylum in the U.S., significantly increasing the burden on the U.S. asylum system.

“This Agreement is unnecessary, inefficient, and inhumane,” said Eleanor Acer, Director of the Asylum Program at Human Rights First. “It will place a significant and unnecessary burden on the United States’ asylum system and will actually make the border less secure by disrupting the orderly border process that is currently in place.”

Full article: US-Canada Safe Third Country Agreement Will Hurt Asylum Seekers

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:35 pm
    What the heck are these politicians doing. I can't wait to hear what kind of B.S will come out of Mr. Martin's mouth regarding this one.

    If Mr. Martin can continue to defend the fact that none of the bombers came from Canada. How can he justify this new agreement? What is his reason. As far as I know there is nothing that happen to force Canada to change how they deal with refugees. 9/11 happen cause of U.S security shortcomings, not Canada's.

    Kevin

    ---
    "War does not determine who is right - only who is left."
    --Bertrand Russell

  2. Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:41 pm
    Paul Martin is a very sad person, regardless of why he does what he does....this is harmozation=appeasement.

    ---
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter --

    Winston Churchill

  3. Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:09 am
    It's the same old non-reason as always, Kevin. We have to or they won't trade with us anymore. I've been listening to that same bit of nonsense since Mulroney was giving our country away and you know what? It works every time.

    I don't understand how or why, but it does.

  4. Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:49 am
    Does it work? I'm not sure the average Canadian even knows what hit them. I think it's a very cynical reason--clearly they don't think people are paying much attention.

    Our wealthy are so funny. They won't trade with us, eh? And I guess the U.S. parent companies of our foreign=owned businesses will refuse to trade with their subsidiaries too, right? hahahaha

    ---
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter --

    Winston Churchill

  5. Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:19 am
    Right. Another sell-out. It's called the "salami technique", they give away a slice of our sovreignty at a time, hoping we won't notice..

  6. Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:29 pm
    I`m at the point where I wish the US wouldn`t 'trade' with us anymore. Maybe then our mentally colonized will actually do some work and look to fair trade around the world.

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news