Must Boost NAFTA: Charest

Posted on Friday, March 04 at 16:37 by Perturbed
"Now with NAFTA we've gone through a whole series of panels, but every time we get a panel decision which is invariably in favour of Canada, the United States goes on to another panel decision and that ends up, I think, questioning whether NAFTA is working or not," Charest told reporters. In a speech Charest said the three countries should be looking at the EU as an example in forging closer ties. "We should now strive to go toward NAFTA-plus, that we should look at dispute settlement mechanisms that have binding effects on jurisdictions and whether we can open up to more trade and services and move forward," Charest said...... www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1109890211684&call_pageid=970599119419

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by N Say
    Sat Mar 05, 2005 8:08 am
    not surprising. he was part of mulroney's cabinet

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  2. Sat Mar 05, 2005 8:37 am
    Oh great! That's all we need- a double dose of poison.

  3. by hoopoe
    Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:40 am
    Forget about this investment garbage and sign actual trade agreements. I also don't see the need to sign trade agreements that are so sweeping in their scope as it is entirely possible to negotiate trade agreements that deal with each industry and ensure that both countries compete on a more or less equal footing. This would have to include labor laws and human rights becoming part of the negotiations, as these play an important role in competition within an industry. For example, it is very difficult for manufacturers in the west to compete with Chinese and Indian workers who make less than $1 per day.

    Canada is in a very strategic position to start making these sorts of demands, as these "third world" countries (third world only in the sense that they pay and treat their workers so badly) are desperate for our resources so I think this is very doable and only requires someone in government with the will to make it happen.

  4. Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:06 am
    I'd forgotten that good point...he was the federalist who "saved" us from the Mulroney problem....he must have been VERY young at that time...26?

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  5. Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:07 am
    Agreed...I'd rather not send resources outside of our own borders without adding value.

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  6. Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:51 am
    Well thank you Premier Charest- for adding your voice
    to the concept of NAFTA plus. I am sure that most of
    Canada's political 'elite', namely, the Premier's, the
    PMO's office, and the Senior Deputy Ministers will be
    jumping to join in on this idea.

    You can bet the NAFTA plus wagon to be negotiated by
    the Canadian political 'elite' at the urging and direction
    of the Four Horseman of the Canadian Apocalpyse,
    namely, the Council of Chief Executives, the CD Howe
    Institute, The Fraser Institute, and Canwest, will place,
    like 'pawns for the taking', our water, energy, culture,
    media ownership, immigration , environmental,
    continental defence & security, and common property
    resources on the negotiation table.

    So what is the response? (A) To fight this 'deep
    integtation' NAFTA Plus idea, issue by issue and (b) to
    hold public hearings, and put forth, like the Council of
    Canadians is doing an alternative vision for a sovereign
    Canada ---all of which is commendable or, to do (a)
    and (b), but also at least to begin the discussion on the
    topic of (c) how it is that elitist Executive Federalism
    empowers an oligarcy of political and business leaders
    to shape and determine a continentalist 'deep
    integration' destiny for this country?

    That later inquiry can only lead to consideration of the
    existing 'constitutional & institutional frame' and the
    urgent need for a constitutional constituent assembly
    so that we the people of Canada can write 'new rules' of
    how we wish to govern ourselves within a sovereign
    Canada.

    Surely, friends of Canada must realize that a sovereign
    nation simply cannot exist within the confines of a
    colonial constitution that empowers poltiical and
    corporate oligarchy while disempowering the creative
    urgings of millions of Canadians for a sovereign
    Canada.

    Indeed, if the Four Horsemen seek new rules for a
    deeply integrated 'continentalist' Canada, we, the
    people of Canada have equal rights to seek new
    democratic rules to govern ourselves, to diminish the
    power of oligarcy, to protect and advance our
    sovereignty, to establish our independence &
    inter-dependence in a multi-polar world - not the
    uni-polar world that USA seeks to create.

  7. Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:23 am
    They want a world government. They won't get it, but will Canada be a casualty?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news