While Canadians worry about closer ties with our neighbours, the rest of the world moves on. Anyone who has visited or lived in the European Union has likely marvelled at the ease of travelling through an essentially border-free territory or the advantages of having a common currency. They may also have reflected on the fact that none of this economic integration has had any impact on the rich cultural, social and linguistic diversity that is the hallmark of Europe.
Compare that with Canada-U.S. commercial relations, which have become increasingly strained due to delays at the border and to irritants such as the protracted softwood lumber dispute. Even within Canada's own borders, trade is hampered by restrictive regulations and interprovincial rivalries. Canada still has a stock market regulator in every province, and a school teacher certified in Manitoba can't get a teaching job outside the province without going back to school.
Canadians may be angst-ridden about opening up our trade, but the socialist government of Chile, as reported recently in this paper, seems to have no trouble with the concept. The country has entered into trade agreements with an astounding list of nations in virtually every region of the globe, making it by far the richest country in South America.
I won't go into all the arguments for and against free trade for Canada. This debate is already in the public domain and, sadly, it feels like déjà vu. What I can say, without hesitation, is that the unprecedented expansion of access - to goods, services, ideas and opportunities - is the primary driver that has created profound and positive change for nations, businesses and individuals around the world, and Canada is no exception to this rule.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com:80/servlet/story/LAC.20070820.RAGENDABINKS20/TPStory/Business
Note: http://www.theglobeandm...

Still, bringing up the EU isn't really a good example.... because that union does not include the money-hungry, megalomaniacal USA. Also, the SPP is happening without our consent, or even our input. That sure as heck makes me nervous.
Despite some obvious problems with inter-provincial barriers and regulations, there's still a lot of positives in restricting the powers and reach of a federal government. For one thing, diversity helps stimulate invention, redundancy helps to prevent catastrophic failures by providing alternatives when something goes wrong, bad decisions made by corrupt, incompetent, and/or disconnected federal politicians can be blocked or offset by local decision makers, the list is endless ...
What we really should be talking about, is looking at how to make things work better, but at the same time making sure that smaller sized autonomous communities play a major role in the system.
The breakup of communities is a form of social genocide comparable to what we see happening with the break up of the family. The result is increased levels of crime, lower birth rates, a loss of identity and sense of community, mass migration, increased pollution (hey it's not MY back yard so what do I care?), etc ...
Big is NOT always better, and can often be down right horrible!