He agrees to being described as having a leftist perspective, but
emphasizes that he is not allied with any political party,
including socialists, at home or abroad.
"One doesn't know who the socialists are any more because the
socialists are all in favour of the neo-liberal agenda," he says.
"If you look at socialists in Europe, what are they doing?
They're adopting austerity measures. I wouldn't want to put a
political label on myself because the neo-liberal consensus is
supported by right-wing and left-wing parties alike, including
the New Democratic Party."
Raised in Geneva, Switzerland, Mr. Chossudovsky followed in his
father's footsteps by becoming an economist. But his father, a
Russian emigre, made a career as a United Nations diplomat, while
Mr. Chossudovsky put his economics training to use as a teacher and
analyst. He came to the University of Ottawa in 1968, attracted by
the promise of a bilingual lifestyle.
It was as a young visiting professor at the Catholic University in
Santiago, Chile, that Mr. Chossudovsky's interest in "economic
repression" was first pricked.
Augusto Pinochet's military junta, which overthrew Salvador Allende
in 1973, quadrupled the price of bread and introduced other
measures that would now be referred to as "a structural adjustment
program."
Mr. Chossudovsky set out, with a doctor, to study the
malnourishment resulting from the bread price hike. He wound up
with a paper that held the Pinochet regime responsible not only for
conventional forms of political repression but for "economic
repression" that impoverished three-quarters of Chile's population.
Since then he has documented the purposeful impoverishment of
people in dozens of countries. His latest book, the
Globalization of Poverty, contains case studies of the collapse
of economies and social structures in Somalia, Rwanda, Vietnam,
India, Brazil, Peru, Russia and the former Yugoslavia. In some
of these countries, IMF/World Bank intervention preceded violent
conflict.
He refers often to "the hidden agenda" of the big banking and
financial organizations. They orchestrate collapses, he says, by
demanding payment of debt service charges and then lending money to
cover the charges but only on condition the recipient country
impose such measures as austerity, privatization and currency
devaluation. The impact is usually destructive: mass shutdowns,
huge unemployment, a wipeout of savings and pensions and purchasing
power, a loss of social services.
Such economic shock therapy, he says, has pushed Russia, for one,
"back to the medieval era," impoverishing millions of people,
deepening the country's foreign debt, driving more than half the
country's industrial plants into bankruptcy and allowing organized
crime to flourish in the banking, real estate and other sectors of
the economy.
Mr. Chossudovsky generally condemns "the criminalization" of the
global economy in which increasingly large amounts of drug money
and other illegally obtained funds are deposited in the world's 55
offshore havens, escaping taxation. The funds are laundered through
an international banking system in which capital movement is easier
than ever owing to the revolution in digital communications.
"This critical drain of billions of dollars in capital flight
dramatically reduces state tax revenues, paralyses social programs,
drives up budget deficits and spurs the accumulation of large
public debts," he writes.
An end to offshore tax havens is one of the few solutions
Chossudovsky advocates. He also says the World Bank, International
Monetary Fund and commercial banks should not be allowed to
"pillage" the central banks of troubled countries.
He is much stronger on description than prescription. But his
descriptions alone constitute a defiance of mainstream economic
scholarship in which "critical analysis is strongly discouraged."
It has not, however, stopped him from teaching for 30 years at U
of O and as a visiting professor in several other countries, as
well as publishing several books, the latest appearing in nine
languages. And while the mainstream media in Canada do not
publish his commentary, he is published frequently in Le Monde
Diplomatique and smaller magazines that don't have investors or
business advertisers.
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky has documented impoverishment of people
in dozens of countries.
© Copyright OTTAWA CITIZEN 2003 For fair use only
___________________________________________________________________
"One doesn't know who the socialists are any more because
the socialists are all in favour of the neo-liberal agenda."
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, Canada 2003
___________________________________________________________________
Note: http://globalresearch.c...
http://www.globalresear...

---
"We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"
Yes, it can be done and will be one day, but not based on any kind of a philosophical theory, because theories can be twisted around to mean the opposite of the original intentions their authors. I've been calling myself a social democrat since my Cambridge days, over 50 years ago, but now I'm convinced that all idelogies are passe. Social democracy may still have the potential to be converted into an economic system based on strict physical laws, not hot air blatherings and speeches.
I discovered in 1985 that the textbook version of the presently used, or rather forced on, definition of economic efficiency was fraudulent and worked for 6 years on the correct definition, with the help of a number of scientist friends, which I copyrighted in 1991 to establish the date. Not for any monetary reasons.
It is the only scientifically correct definition, that I have used and exposed to thousands of economists on various, including several World Bank forums for the past 9 years on the Net. It has also been used and defended in PhD dissertations and remains unbroken and unbreakable. Unlike the presently accepted and used nonsense. The problem is that if we accept and introduce an economic system based on scientific facts, instead of harebrained iedologies, the stock and money markets will collapse. So, what is the solution to prevent a major breakdown and the resulting violence ? Things can not go on forever under the present criminal syatem, but how do we change over without major disasters?
One of these days, when things are a bit slow, I may just write something on this in detail. By the way, I sign my name and location to my postings, because there are other Ed Deaks around, including one unfortunate economics professor in the USA, who must be cursing the day when he was blessed with it. I always take full responsibility for my actions and writings, so this way there's no mistake. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC./
---
RickW
---
RickW
The Star Trek series also described the logical extension of collectivist thinking - the Borg. Each Borg drone exists not for himself, but merely to serve "the collective". The individual is unimportant; the group is everything. That's the ultimate "cooperative" society - one in which individual will and ambition is crushed.
Give me competition anyday. We've seen what happens in the absence of real competition (Air Canada anyone?).
Economics is not so much a hard science as applied group psychology. The basis of the market system is that a given product is only worth something if someone is willing to exchange something (such as money) for it.
BTW,what is the name of your book?Still Available?
<br />
<a href="http://www.dmwright.com/html/ferengi.htm">http://www.dmwright.com/html/ferengi.htm</a><br />
<br />