Canada’S Independence Threatened By Task Force Recommendations

Posted on Friday, May 20 at 15:18 by sthompson
“Canadians have been more concerned with the budget vote and rising support for the Bloc Quebecois, but the truth is that this task force has implications for the future of Canada that are just as important as those events,” says Susan Thompson, founder and President of Vive le Canada.ca. “The task force’s recommendations have far-reaching implications and will affect everything from our regulatory framework to how we handle security and foreign relations to our very identity. These recommendations are a radical step towards defining ourselves as North Americans rather than Canadians, and they lack any recognition that it is crucially important that we retain our ability to make unique democratic decisions as a nation, especially while the U.S. becomes increasingly aggressive and unilateral under the Bush administration.” In a report released on May 17, the Task Force recommends that the Canadian government make a number of changes to speed further economic integration of Canada and Mexico with the United States. Those recommendations include reviewing excluded sections of NAFTA, such as water, and removing any existing barriers to energy, which critics say would threaten Canada’s own domestic energy security. Vive le Canada.ca points out that far from offering a balanced view, the task force is also comprised of strong proponents of deep integration, and its recommendations were inevitably going to be in support of deep integration. Members of the task force include Wendy Dobson, who argued for deep integration in a Border Paper for the C.D. Howe Institute; Tom D’Aquino, head of the Canadian Council for Chief Executives, an organization that argued for deep integration under the name of a North American Security and Prosperity Initiative; and co-chair John Manley, former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and another outspoken proponent of free trade. “It’s bad enough that we still haven’t re-evaluated NAFTA after more than a decade of trade problems and Liberal campaign promises to do so, or that Prime Minister Martin already signed away more of our sovereignty at the Waco Summit with the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and the 40-point smart regulation plan. Now we have to contend with these new recommendations that say we should go even further and abandon whatever shreds of national sovereignty we have left.” “NAFTA has been bad enough. NAFTA Plus will be much worse, and Canadians at least deserve the chance to decide for themselves whether our government should adopt these recommendations. This issue should be a key issue in the next federal election, whenever it is held,” Thompson says. Vive le Canada.ca was launched in 2003 and has rapidly become the best source for news and information on the debate over North American economic integration. The web-based organization currently has over 1300 members across Canada and receives thousands of hits a day. Vive le Canada.ca recently launched a ribbon campaign opposing deep integration with the United States, and has asked like-minded websites and individuals to participate. Details are available at: http://www.vivelecanada.ca/staticpages/index.php/ribbon -30- Fore more information contact: Susan Thompson, President and Founder Susan.thompson@vivelecanada.ca (780) 624-5229 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on May 23, 2005]

Note: http://www.vivelecanada...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat May 21, 2005 2:21 am
    Good for us! Thanks Susan, excellent!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  2. Sat May 21, 2005 2:32 am
    Thanks Catherine, I've sent it on to the national media plus Calgary Herald and Ottawa Citizen but please feel free to forward it on to any local media you see fit (same goes for all Vive members, please feel free to forward to your local media). And thanks for yoour work suggesting to other media outlets that they cover this!

    ---
    Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf

  3. Sat May 21, 2005 3:13 am
    > Canadians have been more concerned with the budget vote and rising support for the Bloc Quebecois, but the truth is that this task force has implications for the future of Canada that are just as important as those events,” says Susan Thompson, founder and President of Vive le Canada.ca.

    Please: Keep the diseased beef, the un-environmentally (clearcut) harvested lumber, the massively disruptive strip-mined petroleum products, and all other uncompensated native-exploited resources on YOUR side of the border.

    Clean up Canada First!

    Vive Le CanaCorp!

  4. Sat May 21, 2005 3:38 am
    Hey, I'm all for full BSE testing (being blocked by US owned meat packers in Canada) and better environmental regulations. The problem is that under deep integration, we're being asked to harmonize our regulations with the regulations in the US, meaning in such cases we're probably going to have roll back those regulations that ARE in place in Canada to meet the (generally lower) US standards. Imagine a world where Canada has to have the same environmental standards as the Bush administration. Not pretty.<br />
    <br />
    I'm also all for Native self-government and actually settling land claims fairly. But again, deep integation isn't going to solve the problems we have with our current government and those issues--instead, it will recolonize our First Nations by bleeding those resources south (ie we'd be selling off the property we don't own to an even bigger imperial power, the U.S.) Again, not pretty (and the reason why leaders such as Chief Gary John have been attending and speaking at <a href="<a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php?story=20031009144602161&query=Chief%2BGary%2BJohn">conferences">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php?story=20031009144602161&query=Chief%2BGary%2BJohn">conferences</a> on how to oppose deep integration</a>).<br />
    <br />
    Vive le Canada.ca is not about supporting the elites here in Canada or the U.S., but we recognize that giving away whatever democratic rights we still have as citizens to corporations under expanded trade agreements like this won't make the situation any better and erodes the voice we still have for change.<p>---<br>Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf<br />

  5. Sat May 21, 2005 4:39 am
    > Imagine a world where Canada has to have the same environmental standards as the Bush administration. Not pretty.

    With a choice restricted to the USA and Canada, which country CURRENTLY HAS THE WORST ENVIRONMENTLAL STANDARDS?

    a) Canada
    b) Canada
    c) Eh?

  6. Sat May 21, 2005 5:25 am
    Which country will have the worst environmental standards after 3.5 more years of Bush? Which country risks losing its universal health care system if it gets too cosy with the other? Which country has already sold out to health insurance companies that own the politicians? Which country's health insurance providers serve as the worlds best argument against the myth that private ownership leads to greater efficiency?

  7. Sat May 21, 2005 6:13 am
    today i saw some good mormon boys doing their
    'converting' on the streets, all dressed up looking goody
    two-shoes, I asked them where they're from, they said
    Sam's place, I told them in no uncertain terms to haul
    their ass across the border where they belong. ...I
    suppose some would call that the negative form of
    nationalism, eh? ...but what they're doing is
    cultural/religious imperialism...and furthermore, unless
    they have some Canada immigration work
    authorization they aren't supposed to be working
    here....I wonder why we don't see more stories about
    how Canada Immigration sends those American boys
    packing back home, along with all of them that were
    involved with the wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Somalia,
    Afganistan, Nato bombing of Yugoslavia, the School of
    the Americas, the Cia, Chile, Cuba, El Salvador,
    Nicaragua, ....etc. etc...wonder why none of our
    Immigration types never check the backgrounds of
    those 'undesireables' & suspected war criminals &
    human rights abusers loitering & working underground
    in Canada?

  8. Sat May 21, 2005 5:25 pm
    How about some PROOF of that then, eh? Just repeating it isn't going to convince anyone. Canada's regulations aren't perfect, as I said above (and I have many, many criticisms of our ruling Liberal government, which is why I vote NDP, a party that would make some important and much needed changes). But we have ratified the Kyoto Protocol, something Bush wouldn't do. <P> Meanwhile it's pretty easy to prove that the Bush administration has a very BAD environmental record--just ask any number of American environmentalists and scientists and even Republicans themselves. I'd like to see any proof that Canada is as bad as the info you can dig up on the US right now even by just scratching the surface. <P> See just for starters: <P> Republican environmental icon Richard Train in an interview with Mother Jones:<br> "The rest of the developed world, with the exception of Russia, all of Europe, Japan, Canada, has recognized global climate change as an imminent threat. Only the U.S. has refused to do so. At the same time, the United States is contributing more, by far, to the existence of this threat, than any other country on the face of the globe. I think some Europeans would say the biggest threat to the world environment is the U.S. I think it's an unhappy day that the U.S. is not in a position of world leadership on an issue that is of such critical importance."<br> <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2004/04/04_100.html">Sounding the Alarm</a> <P> "When a leading psychologist like Harvard's Howard Gardner calls the president's science adviser a "prostitute," it's a safe bet that all is not well in the realm of government science policy. Indeed, in the past month, the United States has been engulfed by a kind of "science war," one pitting much of the nation's scientific community against the current administration. Led by twenty Nobel laureates, the scientists say Bush's government has systematically distorted and undermined scientific information in pursuit of political objectives. Examples include the suppression and censorship of reports on subjects like climate change and mercury pollution, the stacking of scientific advisory panels, and the suspicious removal of scientific information from government Web sites."<br> <a href="http://www.csicop.org/doubtandabout/sciencewars/">The New Science Wars</a> <P> "This administration, in catering to industries that put America's health and natural heritage at risk, threatens to do more damage to our environmental protections than any other in U.S. history. Here is NRDC's account of what the Bush administration has done and is doing on environmental matters."<br> <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/">Natural Resources Defence Council</a> <P> Tracking the Bush administration's environmental misdeeds<br> <P><a href="http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/">BushGreenWatch</a> <P> The Wilderness Society's <a href="http://www.wilderness.org/Library/Documents/BushRecord.cfm">Environmental Record of the Bush administration</a> <P> Environment2004's report, <a href="http://www.environment2004.org/br_home.php">Putting Polluters First: The Bush Administration's Environmental Record</a> <P> "The Bush administration began its term in office by appointing industry officials and legal allies to the U.S. government's top environmental protection offices. Since then it has pursued a strategy of opening public property to development. Current Interior Secretary Gale Norton once worked for the Mountain States Legal Foundation, a think tank promoting commercial development of public lands."<br> <a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Environment/Bush'sEnvironmentalRecord.html">Bush's environmental record</a> <P> Mother Jones' edition on <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2003/09/we_531_01.htm">The Ungreening of America</a> includes the article <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2003/09/ma_494_01.html">Dirty Secrets</a>: "No president has gone after the nation's environmental laws with the same fury as George W. Bush -- and none has been so adept at staying under the radar."<p>---<br>Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf<br />

  9. Sat May 21, 2005 5:28 pm
    Voted the previous comment down, off topic.

    ---
    Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf

  10. Sat May 21, 2005 5:55 pm
    Anonymous,
    Is your view so narrow that you are stuck in an us ainst them mentality?
    If that is the case there will be no winner and only losers.
    Hey anonymous
    Do me a favour and paint a verbal picture of your country.
    Be certain to include the highest incarceration rate in the world,
    WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US prison population, already the largest in the world, reached a new high of more than 2.1 million last year, with one in every 138 residents of the country now behind bars, according to new government statistics.
    The reality of the situation is that it is the people who are the losers and they are because the lack of knowledge, ignorance, about the hidden agenda(s) of the people they elect.
    Although in the case of your country it has been proven the election was rigged, both times
    Anybody, repeat, anybody who blindly follows party lines, or cannot see that the people they elect are in the service of a corporate agenda and that of international bankers is a fool.
    “Canadians” are no more the enemy than are “Americans”
    The enemy, if you will, are the ones your D. Norman Livergood calls the “Criminal Cabal”
    Do your self a favour and study any online curse on critical thinking and then you might be able to see past your blind nationalism


    ---
    "There are two ways to slide easily through life: to believe everything or to doubt everything. Both ways save us from thinking."
    Alfred Korzybski

  11. Sun May 22, 2005 4:34 am
    from Bevinbc - and those prisions are not run by the governments or states - oh surprise they have all been privatized and it is now in the corporate owners bottom line over priced to the taxpayers in the U.S. Arrest and trial ($$'s); Jail and provision of services ($$'s). Putting on a band-aid costs but doen't solve the problem. Getting off topic but better health-care, social security, looking after those who can not help themselves, etc.) Sure it may cost but the 'Bible' does say to look after those in need, spending a 'tithe' of earnings and that is the real Christianity.

  12. Mon May 23, 2005 11:50 pm
    Lots of thought and research into that reply. Nice one Trollboy - way to back up your words with some solid fact. Next he'll post about how all canadians have horns and webbed feet - he heard it from Hannity!!

  13. Tue May 24, 2005 6:48 pm
    “Canada’s Independence Threatened by Task Force Recommendations”<br />
    <br />
    This is one of the most ignorant (lacking in knowledge) headlines I have read for some time!<br />
    <br />
    It is loaded with supposition, presupposition and assumption!<br />
    <br />
    The headline presupposes Canada to be an independent country it is NOT!<br />
    <br />
    Canada, since its conception has been tied to British royalty and in turn international bankers, A fractional reserve system operating on fiat money, foreign absentee ownership and a legal system with its beginnings in Rome.<br />
    <br />
    What independence?<br />
    Independence from what or who?<br />
    <br />
    Canadians, like their neighbours to the south ‘elect’ to be ruled by crooks.<br />
    <br />
    Acquaint yourselves with David Korten’s works.<br />
    <a href="http://www.davidkorten.org/">http://www.davidkorten.org/</a><br />
    <br />
    And that of the Corporation <br />
    <a href="http://www.thecorporation.com/">http://www.thecorporation.com/</a><br />

  14. Tue May 24, 2005 7:42 pm
    As an outsider, I am not here to involve myself in taking sides in your political candidates' personal squabbles over internal Canadian politics. Merely to observe the degree of hostility I had been informed was here. It appears to be true. This will most likely be a very short fact finding mission. After what I have read weaving my way around this website, there's little to question. I had been informed correctly. I am deeply saddened with what I have found here.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news