So it's wrenching being back in Canada confronting the prospect of Stephen Harper as our next prime minister. This is a man who so longed to join George W. Bush's coalition of the willing that he called former defence minister John McCallum an ?idiot? in the House of Commons, declaring we should be in Iraq with the United States, ?doing everything necessary to win.? This is a man who was so eager to ?support the war effort? that he went on Fox and claimed that ?the silent majority of Canadians is strongly supportive? of the invasion, defying the findings of every credible opinion poll.
If the Conservatives are given the chance to turn Canada into more of a card-carrying combatant in Bush's disastrous war on terrorism than we are already, the little bit of grace I encountered in Iraq will quickly disappear. When I go back, showing my passport to the ad hoc inspectors could well have a very different effect.
Full story: On not being American
Note: On not being American
On not being American
---
"These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence." - Sir John Sparrow Thompson
With all of the information out there about the history of the UK and the US in the middle east and their roles in creating and maintaining the dictatorships you talk about, it is ludicrous to make comments that indicate belief the US is some innocent party and/or some do-gooder nation that is only trying to bring "freedom" to the Iraqi people.
For your education, Iraq was created to serve British oil interests after WWI with borders that failed to take into account the various ethnic groups of the region and Britain started Iraq down the road to dictatorship by installing its first puppet king. Of course, it is now widely known that the US was supporting Saddam Hussain because of the billions of dollars invested during his gassing of Kurds, etc. (read Noam Chomsky's book Hegemony or Survival).
Need more? The idea that the US is bringing democracy to the people of this region the height of hypocrisy. In the 1940s and 1950s, Iran had an elected parliamentary government and a constitution that limited the powers of the monarchy (as Britain does). However, when the Iranian parliament decided to nationalize their oil industry the US and Britain got nervous, with the end result that in 1953 with the help of the CIA a coup took place that installed Reza Shah Pahlavi (the new Shah to be was too incompetent to do this on his own). Very soon after the coup he began violating Iran's constitution and became a dictator. His exploits in this capacity are notorius and include the murder of tens of thousands of Iranians and the US didn't even make a complaint about this for the next 30 years. See http://www.mideastweb.org/iranhistory.htm for the full article. By the way, the only search I did for this site was to enter "Iran history democracy" in google, so given this fact where is the excuse for your ignorance about these matters?
These are just two examples. For the past 50 years, the US has been politically interfering in these countries and elsewhere (look to South America for the US's next war on terrorism).
---
"These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence." - Sir John Sparrow Thompson
---
RickW
I figure Canada's ratio to be about 60%, 10%, and 30% of liberals thankfully not afraid to speak up, yet.
And the United States as innocents in all this is precisely the bullshit story that the media peddle. Anyone who beleives that crap is at best totally misinformed.
Welcome to Vive michou. Good to see another Chimpster hanging around these parts.