A friend who attended the occasion explained that McKenna did, indeed, attract much applause. Not for what he said as an ambassador, though, but what he said as a Canadian.
Apparently (my friend took no notes), McKenna talked passionately about Canada itself, about how we're in pretty good shape as nation-states go, and, most forcefully, about how it was time for all our interest groups, regional and ethnic, to stop carping about this or that Canadian shortcoming and, instead, dare to celebrate the nation.
That's what the applause was for; not for softwood lumber. It's the applause, rather than McKenna's oratory, that matters.
Because this was the second time in a week that this had happened.
The first was earlier last week, when Michaëlle Jean was installed as governor general. She gave a very fine speech, making effective use of her own personality and of her own experiences. The intriguing aspect of the event, though, was the response to it. Columnists competed with each other to heap praise upon Jean. Letters newspapers and radio show comments were overwhelmingly euphoric.
In both instances, audiences were responding to the experience of hearing said about Canada what they themselves know to be true about the country, but far too seldom heard being said.
There is one obvious and simple and indisputable fact about Canada today: We are one of the most successful societies in the world.
Two persuasive tests exist of the success of any nation-state in today's global circumstances. One is whether it is paying its bills, so that it's not loading its debts onto coming generations and so can make tough choices among the virtually unlimited demands for spending.
On that score, Canada stands near the top of the class. Countries that we once thought were far better organized and tougher-minded, like Germany, Japan, the U.S. and France, are all in a fiscal mess.
The other measure is the ability, in a world that's now global, to attract, absorb, integrate, learn from and teach its own values to newcomers who mirror the globe in all its different languages and cultures and colours. Like Jean.
In the scale of our immigration, and in the effectiveness of our integration of the great majority of these newcomers, we are unquestionably at the top of the class.
All this is, to repeat, obvious and indisputable. Except in Canada. Except, that is to say, to a lot of Canadians.
As a society, we seem to be functioning like an orchestra that is performing exceptionally well except that it has, in the middle of it, a buzz saw. A large number of buzz saws. There are all the provincial buzz saws making noises like, "me, me, me", and "unfair," and "more money," and "it's all Ottawa's fault." And there are all the protest noises of our ethnic and cultural groups, often, indeed, protesting alleged wrongs done decades, if not centuries, ago.
It's time overdue to listen to the music that we now are making, a good deal of the time, as a society, a collectivity, a nation-state.
That's what those who were so excited by what Jean said, and so delighted by what McKenna said -- and who showed this by their applause -- were trying to say.
It's time, in other words, to change channels, and listen to ourselves.
http://www.embassymag.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2005/october/5/gwyn/
Note: http://www.embassymag.c...

In case Gwynn hasn't noticed, Canada's National debt stands at over 500 billion, while total debt for all canadians of various governments stands in the trillions. Now what was that about our future generations not having to pay? Keep in mind also that if international interest rates skyrocket, all those gains we made were for nothing. You know, perhaps we should finally think about whether all those other countries know something we don't know, after all, it's not like Toronto is the currency capital of the world. Next to Japan and Germany we don't even get a mention.
The other remark is that our immigration system is so wonderful, well, reading any book on the immigration system will get rid of that illusion. Next to natives, immigrants are most likely to live in poverty. As for being so successful, well, that's fine for McKenna, he should go have a look at the province he lead for over a decade sometime. Here in Waterloo region, arguably one of the most successful regions in Canada, a recent media series focused on the fact that 50,000 people in the region live in poverty. This is in a region of approximately 400,000. THat over ten percent live in poverty in one of the wealthiest regions of the country is not a pleasant fact. Keep in mind also that it was recently stated that Canada's economy was at capacity, meaning that this is as good as it gets-imagine what happens when it's not so good.
Of course if you've got lots of money then everything is coming up roses.
Things are not perfect here and they're not in the process of getting any better. Much of this is due to the huge amount of government corruption that has painted the political landscape of the country for over 20 years. Adscam is laughable in contrast to the real scandal that's gripping our country. As more and more Canadian families struggle to make ends meet; as more and more children live in poverty; as more and more of OUR companies and resources are handed over to foreign countries, multi-national companies are reaping the benefits of corporate tax cuts, inflated government contracts, and lax environmental and employment laws. Why? Because the Liberals take care of those who take care of them.
Canada is a great nation. Canadians are great people. So, when are we going to wake up and realize everything is not alright?!!!!!!
-Jason Easton
Ottawa
We have staunched the tide of foreign ownership, now is the time to bleed away the excess, to assert Canadian ownership of Canadian resources.
We have an exceptionally tolerant treatment of mainstream, even militant mainstream, dissenters, but a rather intolerant view of extreme, yet peaceful dissenters. Where the threshold of marginialisation is wider in Canada than in most of the world, the threshold of illegality is narrower. We listen more and we ban more than in most democartic countries. It is a maddening paradox that must be overcome.
We are a nation that claims to jealously guard our own soverignty, yet we seem more than willing to allow the court of Western public opinion to determine the legitimacy of foreign leaders. If we are opposed to the American presence in Iraq, then why are we in Afganistan? If we are for the presence in Afganistan, then why aren't we in Iraq? We have failed to clearly articulate the reasons for which we use force.
We lose the most federal power when we have the most avowedly federalist governments at the provincial level. We have a federal government that seems unwilling to crack the whip as it were. Unwilling to meet the demads of the Canadian public for leadership, a succession of prime ministers from Pearson to Martin failed the Canadian people and believed that federalism was presiding over a rotation of bigger cheques, increased provincial powers, and angrily holding the line in front of the camera.
But again, with a 7% unemployment rate, nationnal surpluses, stable incomes, and improving environmental conditions as far as the eye can see. We're doing alright.
The problem is and remains, that we could be doing so much better.