ANALYSIS - The Power Of Secrecy

Posted on Wednesday, August 15 at 18:26 by jensonj
The patent lack of sensitive national security content in any of the declassified passages set pundits seething in indignation and commentators across the spectrum seemed to agree that the government's actions not only breached public interest, but compromised its essential integrity. It is not hard to see what might have motivated the government to try to keep the passages in question classified. They are doubly damning in so far as they not only put the lie to the air of innocence maintained by the security services in relation to the fate of Arar, but also show that Canadian authorities were in much closer connection with the agency ultimately responsible for Arar's rendition than originally thought. Indeed, at least one senior CSIS operative strongly suspected very early on in the whole saga that Arar had been targeted under the American transport-to-torture rendition program led by the CIA. Moreover, such suspicions were conveyed to CSIS high command but were not subsequently shared with the agency's political masters. Furthermore, the declassified portions make it clear that the CIA itself directly contacted the RCMP for intelligence on Arar shortly before he was subject to rendition. Finally, the declassified passages show that the RCMP complied with the request for information immediately and in full–sans the mandatory caveats and qualifications intended to safeguard the use of such information. http://www.embassymag.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2007/august/15/deisman/ [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on August 16, 2007]

Note: http://www.embassymag.c...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:48 am
    >>Indeed, at least one senior CSIS operative strongly suspected very early on in the whole saga that Arar had been targeted under the American transport-to-torture rendition program led by the CIA.<<

    (Article 1, UN Declaration Against Torture, 1975)

    "No State may permit or tolerate torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Exceptional circumstances such as a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency may not be invoked as a justification of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

    Torturers portray themselves and are portrayed by those who accommodate, accept, or justify the torture as the actual victims and as legitimate objects of sympathy for what they have suffered. One of the most famous claims to this status was made by Adolf Eichman during his trial in the early 1960s. A Nazi leader, Eichman had served as Chief of the Gestapo's Jewish Office and as SS Lieutenant-Colonel. He was subsequently convicted of crimes against humanity and crimes against the Jewish people, and executed. During his trial, Eichman testified: "I am not the monster I am made out to be. I am the victim. . ."



    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news