Network Neutrality? Welcome To The Stupid Internet

Posted on Saturday, June 10 at 09:30 by jensonj
Is it an alien invasion? A convergence of planets or some other astral phenomenon? No, it's a convergence of a different sort. Turns out that tonight is also the night of the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, as well as the night Coldplay releases its latest song online. And YouTube has just released embarrassing video of a major Hollywood star having a ``wardrobe malfunction.'' Extremely high demand on the Internet is overwhelming available bandwidth, and regulations passed back in 2006 make it illegal for network operators to differentiate and prioritize content. Welcome to the world of network neutrality, where all content is treated exactly the same; where telecom and cable companies are legally prohibited from giving certain types of content priority handling. A world where somebody decided that a stupid network is better than a smart network. Well, how well did that work out? As more and more of our lives migrate to the Internet, if we want our TV viewing, phone conversations and other applications to be at least as reliable as they are now, it is critical that networks be allowed to become smarter -- to partition bandwidth and prioritize packets to make sure that different types of content get appropriate handling. The equivalent of HOV lanes (which give priority during heavy traffic) and FedEx delivery (which allows people to pay more for faster and more reliable service) must be permitted on the Internet for it to become what we all want it to be. http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/14781013.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

Note: http://www.siliconvalle...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by avatar Jacob
    Sat Jun 10, 2006 7:13 pm
    This article was obviously written for US readers. I firmly believe that the internet (including access to e-mail) is international just like the postal services that were organized into the Universal Postal Union in 1874. It is very wrong to grant control to local telehone and cable companies.

    The article does (of course) not venture to say what the view of Canada might be, or if Canada has already taken a position on this. (or any other country, for that matter)

    Anybody?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news