The Long Arm Of Lockheed Martin

Posted on Tuesday, December 07 at 15:31 by sthompson
Another concern that was apparently raised was the worry that people will not fill out census forms if BMD is approved due to people seeing the conflict (Lockheed Martin would be building major components for the missile defence shield, remember).

Vive's friends also say we should keep an eye on Senate Bill S18--change of confidentiality after 92 years.

If you're still wondering "who is Lockheed?", here's an excellent article that explains it all. A quote:

LOCKHEED MARTIN doesn't run the United States. But it does help run a breathtakingly big part of it.

Over the last decade, Lockheed, the nation's largest military contractor, has built a formidable information-technology empire that now stretches from the Pentagon to the post office. It sorts your mail and totals your taxes. It cuts Social Security checks and counts the United States census. It runs space flights and monitors air traffic. To make all that happen, Lockheed writes more computer code than Microsoft.

Of course, Lockheed, based in Bethesda, Md., is best known for its weapons, which are the heart of America's arsenal. It builds most of the nation's warplanes. It creates rockets for nuclear missiles, sensors for spy satellites and scores of other military and intelligence systems. The Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency might have difficulty functioning without the contractor's expertise.

But in the post-9/11 world, Lockheed has become more than just the biggest corporate cog in what Dwight D. Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex. It is increasingly putting its stamp on the nation's military policies, too.

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:02 pm
    Now that the BC Privacy Commissioner has expressed concerns, perhaps we should start a campaign to the federal Privacy Commissioner to raise concerns about the census.

    Any Vive campaigns involving the public should definitely make the LM connection between BMD and the census, as well as pointing out what the BC Privacy commissioner said.

  2. Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:21 pm
    I would like to clarify the points raised by your article.

    The objectives of the 2004 Census Test were to assess content of the census questionnaire, the interoperability of the various systems developed for the 2006 Census, the newly developed internet response channel and new methods in field operations. Statistics Canada has never had any intention of disseminating data from the 2004 Census Test.

    We are aware of the concerns of the BC Privacy Commissioner and have been working with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada in assuring that the information provided by Canadians is totally safe. Moreover, Statistics Canada has asked that three independent security verifications of the Agency's census confidentiality protection measures be conducted prior to the 2006 Census.

    No confidential data ever leave the country. At no point is any contractor in possession of any confidential census data. The work that Statistics Canada has contracted-out relates solely to the provision of hardware, software, printing and support services. All census databases, facilities and networks containing confidential data are in Canada and are, at all times, under the exclusive control of Statistics Canada. Therefore, even if a request were made by a U.S. authority to any contractor, it would be physically impossible for them to provide any information, given that they are never in possession of this confidential information.

    Greg Peterson
    Statistics Canada

  3. Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:45 pm
    While the techies among us appreciate your need for a test run before the actual census Mr. Peterson, again, you miss the point.

    Privacy reasons and Patriot act aisde, I for one am against Lockheed Martin having anything to do with our census. They should not be a contractor for the government of Canada for any reason other than military procurement.

    There are many Canadian companies perfectly capable of "hardware, software, printing and support services". lowball bid aside, the Government of Canada can afford to deny politicians and bureaucrats their $200 a day lunch allowance, and hire Canadian companies. Let them bring their lunch, like the rest of us do, and give more Canadians jobs!

    And I still don't trust the Lockheed Martin won't somehow have access to the raw data. I can't trust that a company won't do whatever it's largest customer asks it to do.


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  4. Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:52 pm
    Greg Peterson,

    I think we've gone over your points before have we not?

    So these are the points I would like to reiterate for you.

    1.If we are not building the hardware/software you cannot guarantee that access has not been built into it.
    2.What's the rush to have a US contractor do the work when we could use the system that we have until a Canadian solution has been created? That alone has created skepticism in me.
    3.The very idea that you would use Canadian tax dollars to support the military machine is beyond justifiable.

    ---
    "Yeah, well, [Mr. President] we used all five fingers because that's the way our mittens are made." Antonia Zerbisias

  5. Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:00 pm
    What are the penalties for falsifying or just plain burniong a census return?

  6. Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:27 pm
    I shoulda added that You'd think a country that could build the gunning computers for Abrams tanks could count their own census...

  7. Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:09 am
    So why don't you trust Greg or StatCan? I've been reading these posts for a while and no one wants to trust our own government when they tell us it is ok. What's the beef? Has StatCan done something really wrong in the past that I'm not aware of? What did they do to make you turn against their word?

  8. Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:18 am
    <br><br><i>at at a recently held 'secret' meeting of StatCan</i> <br><br> Now THAT is good reporting! I am glad that the author was kind enough to post the 'secret meeting minutes' and the 'secret PowerPoint presentation' and...oh yeah...what about the 'double super secret action items list'. Can't get much better reporting than this! NO SIR!!!! Awesome stuff here! <br><br> I smell BS. I call shenanigans. <br><br> <b>Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but facts belong to no one.</b>

  9. Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:35 pm
    I am all for StatsCan. I respect and trust them. I do not trust Lockheed Martin, nor it's largest customer, the US Government.


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  10. Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:01 am
    Ok. Why don't you trust Lockheed? Just because they build military equipment doesn't cut it either, doc...those same weapons protect you and your family each and every stinking day of the year, something you have probably forgotten that you take for granted. Is it only that LM is based in the US and you are upset that the US went to war recently? Tell you what...how about LM just turn the contract over to someone who can do as good a job ... a quality backed company we can trust ... how about IBM, for example. OH WAIT! Doesn't pass the test again (based in the US...has ties to the military). Darn...wonder who we could get in place of them?!?!? How about looking inside StatCan to see what they can do? Well! That does it, then! They know how to count and they've done it for years. They must be sooo good at it by now and I bet they save us money too. BUZZZZZZZZ!!!!!! Oops, one of the reasons that they went with a company like LM is that our last census cost us around $300M and that was too much for the good ole taxpayer. Check your newspaper...all there in black and white. I bet LM was hired because they can do it cheaper and StatCan probably didn't know how to do the more complicated stuff on the computer end. So where does that leave us...no one with military ties, no one from statcan, no one from the US because they go to war for funny reasons... I've got it! What about a non military, non US tied, non Statcan, Canadian firm with extensive experience with doing large complicated census systems integration including some new features like internet forms? Any takers? Anyone? Anyone? Who out there has this kind of resume? I'm waiting... (btw, give me a name and I will tell you if they meet the grade...i bet you a loony that they won't make the grade either...large systems integrators usually have ties to the government/military...small and medium contractors cant do it...don't even suggest that some group of college kids with adult supervision could do it, either...they would probably get you the 2006 census results in 2020).

    Now...back to the guts of the issue: trust. Why don't you trust LM? Give me specifics, please...how have they wronged you? How have they hurt you? Do you think that LM is giving our data to the US government? How do you know this? What facts can you provide to back up this claim? Does it boil down to something you read on the internet that sounded scary? Something like "if LM does the census they are obligated by the patriot act to turn over data to Bush!" ? Can you back that up? Please show me where it says that Bush cares about where we live or how many cats we own? THEY DONT CARE ABOUT US! Stop thinking that they care! They don't! If you believe otherwise, you are living in an alternative reality and need to see a medical professional.

  11. Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:03 am
    Why can't you trust them when they make a decision to make or buy the system, then?

  12. Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:21 pm
    Peterson, its none of Lockeed Martin`s business. Period. Now go live in the states where this sort of corporate fascist thinking is more acceptable.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  13. Wed Dec 15, 2004 6:19 am
    <p> There is concern over there too! Last November, <i>The New York Times</i> published this: <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2004/041128-lockheed.htm">Lockheed and the Future of Warfare</a> by TIM WEINER. <p> <p> Excerpt: "LOCKHEED MARTIN doesn't run the United States. But it does help run a breathtakingly big part of ... Over the last decade, Lockheed, the nation's largest military contractor, has built a formidable information-technology empire that now stretches from the Pentagon to the post office. It sorts your mail and totals ... " <p> This blog which I am taking the liberty of reproducing (I'm hopeful that the blogger will not mind) appeared at <a href="http://www.plec.blogspot.com/">Globalize This!</a> <p> <b> NEW FACE OF THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX</b><p> Militarization of the American government is, at this stage, approaching total and irreversible, if we are to believe Chalmer's Johnson's new book <i><b>The Sorrows of Empire</b></i> (in which he is quite methodical and convincing). <p> Today's NYT fills in some of these details: <p> Lockheed stands at "the intersection of policy and technology," and that "is really a very interesting place to me," said its new chief executive, Robert J. Stevens, a tightly wound former Marine. "We are deployed entirely in developing daunting technology," he said, and that requires "thinking through the policy dimensions of national security as well as technological dimensions." <p> ...No contractor is in a better position than Lockheed to do business in Washington. Nearly 80 percent of its revenue comes from the United States government. Most of the rest comes from foreign military sales, many financed with tax dollars. And former Lockheed executives, lobbyists and lawyers hold crucial posts at the White House and the Pentagon, picking weapons and setting policies. <p> And THEY (!) are working with Census Canada ??? WHAT ARE WE THINKING !!!

  14. Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:28 am
    Nope, don't mind. Thanks for reading.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news