question: How strong can that commitment to a Canadian interconnection be if the power, politically and economically be in the United States for north-south connection? How long can the provinces hang together on something like that?
Jean Charest: It is very substantial and the potential for development is tremendous....

<br />
To get down to the "bottom line", is what is really being discussed here some sort of NAWAPA and/or GRAND Canal scheme:<br />
<a href="http://www.schillerinstitute.org/economy/maps/maps2.html#nawapa">http://www.schillerinstitute.org/economy/maps/maps2.html#nawapa</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recycling_and_Northern_Development_Canal">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recycling_and_Northern_Development_Canal</a><br />
...especially as Campbell seems to go out of his way to emphasize BC's continuing relationship with the US.....?<p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
-Max Planck<br />
<br />
---
"George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va
Who was it that sold BC Gas (later callled Terrasen) to a US owner? Was it Dosange's NDP or Campbell's BC Liberals?
Who was it that sold Trans Mountain Pipelines to a US owner called Kinder Morgan? Was it Dosange's NDP or Campbell's BC Liberals?
Saying things is different than doing things.
---
"George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va